jimbacher

[quote name='Banksy' date='10 June 2010 - 06:26 PM' timestamp='1276208751' post='2332211'] You're not great with the whole "reading comprehension" thing, are you? If an ODNer would refuse to back BAPS, and would only back UPN then, regardless of who wins the war, we could not 'pick' the winning side as we would always pick UPN, [b]win or lose[/b]. [/quote] Perhaps I failed English, but you apparently have failed history.

[quote name='Hakim' date='10 June 2010 - 06:20 PM' timestamp='1276208436' post='2332200'] UPN would have actually had to fight in order to put 1 nation into anarchy in the last war...which is, I believe, your subtle point. o/ BAPS you guys rock...[img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/wub.gif[/img] [/quote] Not true, you can put your own nation into anarchy...

[quote name='Banksy' date='10 June 2010 - 06:16 PM' timestamp='1276208180' post='2332193'] Shot bro. He was brining up the point that there is no way an ODNer would back BAPS ~ [/quote] and my original statement was that ODN would back the winning side...so apparently ODN thinks BAPS would win. Hence I lulz at you for thinking your ally will lose.

[quote name='joracy' date='10 June 2010 - 06:09 PM' timestamp='1276207770' post='2332181'] Oh ho ho, funny man. Somehow I doubt any ODN nations would be interested in getting near BAPS, or BAPS would be interested in welcoming ODN nations. [/quote] UPN & ODN| The Treaty of Valencia |Mutual Defense and Optional Aggression Pact | Active

[quote name='Banksy' date='10 June 2010 - 06:04 PM' timestamp='1276207433' post='2332167'] This will end well But who will we all ghost? :iiam: [/quote] I assume the winning side?

Hey BAPS, can you get rid of the no ghosting clause?

Completely unexpected...

Matthew I hope you guys are willing to unconditionally surrender to IRON/DAWN, because that would be the only appropriate punishment for you guys at this point.

[quote name='Bilrow' date='10 May 2010 - 09:44 PM' timestamp='1273542259' post='2294274'] Yay Radio Silence. [/quote] ehhm....Bilrow....(inside joke)

[quote name='Seth Muscarella' date='06 May 2010 - 10:56 PM' timestamp='1273200949' post='2289670'] I see not even the great NPO has taught you to read or write. Weren't you an officer in our military when we attacked Pacifica? If I remember right, you didn't have a problem until we focused our attacks inward for a member purge. [/quote] Let me guess the questionaire included the following: If we have a choice between backstabbing or not backstabbing? A) Backstab B) Not backstab I see Seth answered that question correctly from his alliance's perspective.

[quote name='alyster' date='06 May 2010 - 10:29 PM' timestamp='1273199352' post='2289620'] Says our long time ally and suporter I wonder how big the reps for you have to be compared to IRON Edit: I also wonder who's the next alliance you backstab? [/quote] I don't think you really want an answer to that question do you?

I think IRON/DAWN should demand an unconditional surrender from grem.

[quote name='Ashoka the Great' date='04 May 2010 - 12:11 PM' timestamp='1272989460' post='2286446'] I was just "NoU'd" by the Imperator Emeritus of the New Pacific Order. I can now die in peace, my mission complete. [/quote] Heil, Well then at least I can one up you by getting kick-banned by Moo (and let us not forget mary <3). I personally hope to see some tech from NPO. I heard there former allies are entitled to some of the interest generated by the K.A.R.M.A. war bonds.

[quote name='Lord Brendan' date='02 May 2010 - 10:33 AM' timestamp='1272810766' post='2283746'] Yeah, diverting reparations to MK is perfectly legitimate as per the terms, and you have purposely misinterpreted something Londo said previously to make it seem as if he's changed his stance. [/quote] To think that Londo's stance on anything has been consistent over time would require you to ingest some drug that reacts to lunacy. I believe that NPO requires the right to complain about the harshest terms ever given because one can only take so much bull-crap from the opposition before insanity onsets. Think about it this way, if NPO forgoes lamenting over this stuff now, the G15 may have to suffer when Moo coups Cortath. Moo would force war later upon the G15 later, stemming from the onset of Mad Cow Disease. The end result of this war could cause Londo to go insane from the long lasting radiative side effects, which may actually bring him closer to being normal after all.

Happy birthday my little orange friends.

Is this serious londo, because you have me very confused now.

[quote name='Fallen_Fool' date='07 April 2010 - 02:36 PM' timestamp='1270665376' post='2251880'] Okay generally I've been steering clear of these debates, but enough is enough. So basically you're restating what Grub already largely admitted to? Why precisely? You were at war with GOD, which means that GOD nations were attacking you, which means that by attacking GOD we were assisting you. Not to mention that by bringing the hurt to GOD's nations we stepped up pressure on them enough to, hopefully, cause them to try and pressure Fark into peace. You can't twist that logic out of existence. Again with this line. Were GOD applying pressure on NSO? Maybe, maybe not. I don't have facts to say one way or the other. Would hurting GOD lead to them applying pressure on Fark to end the conflict? Grub certainly thought so, which is why Polar declared on GOD. To, you know, help NSO. Where I come from airing disagreements with allies publicly is bad form. So yeah, it's not really a surprise that Grub chose not to plaster his concerns all over the public boards or try to build political capital out of them. Instead he probably went to Ivan and attempted to calmly, and rationally express his reservations. In fact, he did go to Ivan to express his concerns. So perhaps instead of saying "POLAR NEVER MENTIONED DISAGREEMENTS WITH NSO EVER" you should consult with your predecessor. I believe Grub admitted that his lack of communication did cause problems but that, in the end, every alliance makes its own destiny. NSO included. [b]Where precisely did you get these logs and did you ever stop to think about whether or not they were like, you know, real? Or if they were in their proper context?[/b] [/quote] How could telling someone you were screwing over your ally have a proper context?

What do you guys think of TPF, I am sortof curious.

NSO will be fine. Ivan was a great leader, who did great things for their alliance. Lintwad is a great guy, and I suspect he will also do great things for their alliance.

[quote name='Airikr' date='25 February 2010 - 12:01 PM' timestamp='1267117524' post='2203147'] You've fallen to the other side very quickly my old friend.. Wonder what they put in their koolaid over there. [/quote] Probably some old shrooms that grew in the crap of our "Dear Leader"

[quote name='OneBallMan' date='25 February 2010 - 09:13 AM' timestamp='1267107399' post='2202988'] Your presence in the Grub discussions where he appears to have greenlighted the attack was just as window dressing perhaps? Shocking. Shocking I say. The bitter comment, while an attempt to diminish my credibility, does seem to throw down the gauntlet. [/quote] You have no credibility since you probably have not seen all the logs. I see you have already taken up the fine MK art of trolling. Good show OBM.

[quote name='Kryievla' date='24 February 2010 - 05:13 PM' timestamp='1267049847' post='2202091'] Oh wow, I was thinking that same thing. I don't even see why it's a necessary stipulation if you've beaten someone so badly that they have to surrender (in NSO's case, accept white peace) in the first place. They would be of limited effectiveness on return, as well as face a redeclaration and harsh terms if they did jump back in after being granted such leniency. [/quote] Not only that, but they are probably mostly in bill-lock, so how could they re-enter. A no re-entry clause is actually redundant at this point since most of NSO is in anarchy and probably bill-lock, so they counldn't declare wars anyways...

Interesting [b]anal[/b]ogy Heggo

[quote name='Earogema' date='24 February 2010 - 10:58 AM' timestamp='1267027327' post='2201490'] If you're talking about Poison Clan. http://www.cybernations.net/stats_alliance_stats_custom.asp?Alliance=\m%2F&input1=Poison+Clan That's 7 of 71 currently. Granted, they may have originally been in peace mode, but let's face it. [/quote] Easy to say face it when you are winning. Look at when they [b]Originally[/b] declared on polar. Subtract out the AA pirates and see what you are left with. I love how you now look at their stats when doing so currently is pointless since they are under no real threat.

Hey Peace mode Clan, I actually did the statistics earlier in the war before Bipolar turned. In fact I gave the numbers to grub and have the numbers logged most likely. You guys had more than 60% of your NS in peace mode, and of the 40% in war mode, more than 50% were AA pirates that tagged along. So that puts you at [b]80% of your orginal NS was in peace mode [/b]when the whole thing started. So stop lying out your Piece of Crap @$$.