jimbacher

[quote name='Hyperion321' date='20 February 2010 - 03:31 PM' timestamp='1266697878' post='2194053'] If you weren't too busy using underhanded tactics to try to force a surrender from WAPA, maybe you would have been in there. [/quote] Please post logs that would show underhanded tactics. You are full of crap and you know it. Your side is so full of under-handed crap you have no room to speak.

[quote name='Bilrow' date='16 February 2010 - 01:36 AM' timestamp='1266302184' post='2185043'] When Hell Freezes? [/quote] Or when Bilrow's heart grows 3x its size? Seriously though, give me my reps. Don't make me tech raid u guys...

[quote name='Bilrow' date='16 February 2010 - 01:34 AM' timestamp='1266302053' post='2185033'] Well they should still pay it anyways! Evil NPO. [/quote] You owe reps to TPF too, when can I get those?

[quote name='WarriorConcept' date='16 February 2010 - 01:29 AM' timestamp='1266301768' post='2185020'] What mess am I in? I do not believe my alliance nor my nation are at war at the moment. Glad to see you not arguing the point at all however and going off on a hypothetical though, always a good show of lack of argument. [/quote] Why are you talking then. Go away. This is about NPO's non-neutrality, and noone cares about you or your alliance.

NPO this non-neutrality will not stand...perhaps you didn't learn so well from GPA. My slots are opening soon, and I have more nukes than your entire alliance...

[quote name='Hyperion321' date='14 February 2010 - 03:46 PM' timestamp='1266180389' post='2181182'] yes. [/quote] Shouldn't you and Athens be at eternal war like the good ole days. Didn't sparta conquer the athenians at some point? See, you are ebil.

[quote name='Merrie Melodies' date='14 February 2010 - 01:05 AM' timestamp='1266127511' post='2180396'] Thank God, I've always thought the world of WAPA. and them being treated to you always made me gag a little. [/quote] \m/ makes me gag a lot....so I guess its cool then right?

I like how our side is to feel "honored" that we even get a white peace offer. I love this new age of KARMA.

[img]http://img638.imageshack.us/img638/8500/wapa.jpg[/img]

Unfortunately the wheels on WAPA's bus are square

[quote name='Penlugue Solaris' date='07 February 2010 - 12:53 PM' timestamp='1265565191' post='2167000'] Polaris is declaring only one war? Please show me any proof of that for the future. I will not debate your point for now, but if it happens to change, don't be surprised. [/quote] Your search for new polar order the order of the paradox returned 1 results. Serving 1 to 1 of 1 Results

[quote name='jamesdanaher' date='06 February 2010 - 09:52 PM' timestamp='1265511163' post='2165804'] Athens did not pre-emptively blitz you because of what they felt you *might* do. They attacked you for spying on them. But regardless of that- your argument does not match Achron's words. He simply said that TOP/IRON/TORN would not be in the situation they are in now if they hadn't chosen to aggressively attack C&G. They put themselves in this mess. [/quote] Wow, you obviously have no idea what actually happened, but that is no matter I guess. I hope your alliance puts yourself in a situation to get rolled sometime(instead of befriending the ever changing big-kid on the block), it would be a change for sure.

[quote name='itseZe' date='06 February 2010 - 09:43 PM' timestamp='1265510601' post='2165790'] Try to read what he wrote again. He didn't claim that C&G wouldn't be involved. [/quote] Ok, then why the outrage, I am confused.

[quote name='TheNeverender' date='06 February 2010 - 09:02 PM' timestamp='1265508165' post='2165699'] A few points of clarity: C&G is not looking for a "statistical advantage" over TOP so much as we're looking to make sure they're not really in a position to devastate us with a massive preemptive strike in the future. Given that they've demonstrated w/o hesitation that they will be more than happy to do this, we have no reason to believe they won't do it again...I mean, do you really expect us not to make sure we're not going to get ****ed again? That'd be pretty freaking stupid of us. Then again, I feel like the only people campaigning for this are on the side of the war against C&G, and seem to want to lay waste to us. How odd. And here we thought White Peace in Karma would set things off on the right foot or something. You'd be foolish if you didn't believe MK hasn't been rendering all the assistance to Polaris that it can on its other fronts. We've been working tirelessly with the alliances involved, and while we're not really in a position to lend military support (and it has not been requested), we are nonetheless helping out however we can. Hopefully the fruits of those labors will be able to manifest themselves soon enough. [b]And lastly, before you seek to blame Grub for everything, none of this would have happened if TOP and IRON and company hadn't preemptively blitzed an uninvolved C&G.[/b] Yes, you can say "GRUB OKAYED IT!!!!" but that doesn't change the fact that TOP and company both devised and executed the plan. They claim we were going to enter against them - well, if you had activated our treaties, then yes, we would have honored our damn treaties and defended our allies. But outside of that obvious state (which should really be the status quo for any alliance on Bob), we were an uninvolved party. You brought this on yourselves, TOP and friends, and now you've made it clear through this TOPocalypse stunt that you wish to make it as brutal as possible. This folly is of your making, not ours. [/quote] So it is only acceptable when a member of your bloc attacks another alliance(say TPF for instance) with a 6 month old cb(without negotiations or any diplomacy). You would have entered the fray regardless, so try to contain some of the moral outrage. Yes, TOP and IRON acted stupidly in prempting the treaties, but don't act like you would have been some uninvolved party.

[quote name='astronaut jones' date='05 February 2010 - 04:48 PM' timestamp='1265406517' post='2162117'] And deservedly so. [/quote] About Will Smith Empire: i unconditionally surrender. wurm2112 gets 50 techs. Why did you even post here?

[quote name='Van Hoo III' date='02 February 2010 - 06:27 PM' timestamp='1265153271' post='2154060'] As far as mediation goes ... I was there. There was an offer on the table that \m/ was considering, but they were declared on less than 24 hours after the offer was made. [/quote] Rediculous I know. I would expect at least a full month for diplomacy. Especially since you guys just got out of a war a month ago that was resolved in this 24 hour diplomatic timetable. Oh wait, Rok doesn't give diplomacy a chance in the first place, so really your point is irrelevant.

[quote name='Reign of HavoK' date='31 January 2010 - 09:22 PM' timestamp='1264990963' post='2149122'] Athens officially supports FAN in this issue. Should any problems arise, you know where to find me [/quote] Does anyone else find this [b]IRONIC[/b]

Why are u guys getting pissed off, seriously? These comments were made in private, not in a public channel. Londo are you actually surprised that this is how people think of you?

[quote name='Choader' date='30 January 2010 - 10:29 PM' timestamp='1264908596' post='2146412'] The truth usually is. [/quote] Funny, coming from Piece of $#!7 Clan.

I don't know, londo, maybe you rolled an alliance for a 6 month old cb? I agree with your last 2 points.

fixed it for you Londo. QQ

NO U. I find it funny how MK is like good job STA, when they are talking about their own treaty partners getting rolled. Noone likes you Athens, but its ok. I still blame polar for the mess of crap that has become the cluster@#$% war.

What about polar?

There were projectile weapons before firearms you know...In any case, GL Carthage, give em hell.

I'll be more impressed with some more DOWs. Wouldnt it be funny to see Polar roll this bloc?