WarriorConcept Posted October 31, 2009 Report Share Posted October 31, 2009 Ah, I guess they all ran back, so much for ballsy posturing. I'm pretty sure the guy just got deleted. If anything both sides are posturing and have yet to actually do anything. A Soviet Attack (who is now deleted because of what I said last post), and Matt-Shovel, who was meant to be ASA's replacement. Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shahenshah Posted October 31, 2009 Report Share Posted October 31, 2009 I'm pretty sure the guy just got deleted. If anything both sides are posturing and have yet to actually do anything.Thanks. They had 5 members in SLF, did 4 or 1 got deleted? Atleast 1 of them is flying SLCB flag http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_d...ation_ID=362904 and one ran off to iFOK applicant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarriorConcept Posted October 31, 2009 Report Share Posted October 31, 2009 What I have seen them do several times in this thread is state that they are not affiliated with SLF. In fact that has been the crux of the argument. Beyond that in the 7 pages I have read so far, I have not seen an official denouncement of these action. Further, if SLBC does in fact denounce the OP's statement. They should ask that he strike it from his post so that it does not taint the views of those just begining to read the thread.Additionally, if the SLBC wants people to believe that they have nothing to do with this. It may be prudent to title the tread something different. "Operation Purplenurple" implies some sort of collusion and pre-planning. As if this we a plan created, now being set into motion. My point is that the OP is extremely combative, and the official leadership should disavow that post and restate what they wanted Bob to get from that post, without the combative language. That is, unless they do think that SLF is doing something morally correct.... http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?s...t&p=1940551 look i dont know how to make it any more clear than this.if someone is flying the SLF AA, their actions are not condoned, supported or sanctioned by the rest of SLCB. if someone changes from SLCB to SLF that simply means they are declaring their intentions to both leave SLCB permanently AND conduct their own operations outside of SLCB influence or governance. Since Shovel left I don't think there's much left to do? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebel Virginia Posted October 31, 2009 Report Share Posted October 31, 2009 Welcome to the happy chorus of the wildest speculators! You're on your way to the stage deux; backing up your brilliant theories with some solid facts. I need to prove nothing. My words are truth by virtue of my speaking of it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
draov Posted October 31, 2009 Report Share Posted October 31, 2009 SLF disbanded as quickly or more quickly than they formed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brenann Posted October 31, 2009 Report Share Posted October 31, 2009 (edited) They had 5 members in SLF, did 4 or 1 got deleted?Atleast 1 of them is flying SLCB flag http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_d...ation_ID=362904 and one ran off to iFOK applicant. 1 Deleted 2 went back to SLCB (EDIT: One is the 19 day nation previously mentioned attacking random people) 1 is applying to iFOK 1 is still a SLF Edited October 31, 2009 by Brenann Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shahenshah Posted October 31, 2009 Report Share Posted October 31, 2009 1 Deleted 2 went back to SLCB 1 is applying to iFOK 1 is still a SLF SLF WAE? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarriorConcept Posted October 31, 2009 Report Share Posted October 31, 2009 They had 5 members in SLF, did 4 or 1 got deleted?Atleast 1 of them is flying SLCB flag http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_d...ation_ID=362904 and one ran off to iFOK applicant. So what you're assuming is the others who left SLCB and to SLF wanted to fight? I'm pretty sure if they wanted to they would have attacked. Is it a rule to want to destroy purple now in order to join the SLF AA? You're still not pointing out to me how invicta and the rest of them have shown any more balls during this whole situation either to be honest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Curzon Posted October 31, 2009 Report Share Posted October 31, 2009 Will SLCB be attacking those former SLF now ghosting their AA? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iosif Posted October 31, 2009 Report Share Posted October 31, 2009 (edited) I need to prove nothing. My words are truth by virtue of my speaking of it. Adorable, but just no. This thread is not for you ego games so try again when you've actually formed an argument. Edited October 31, 2009 by Iosif Moldov Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
draov Posted October 31, 2009 Report Share Posted October 31, 2009 So what you're assuming is the others who left SLCB and to SLF wanted to fight? I'm pretty sure if they wanted to they would have attacked. Is it a rule to want to destroy purple now in order to join the SLF AA?You're still not pointing out to me how invicta and the rest of them have shown any more balls during this whole situation either to be honest. Why must balls be the defining variable in a matter of courage vs. cowardliness? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarriorConcept Posted October 31, 2009 Report Share Posted October 31, 2009 I need to prove nothing. My words are truth by virtue of my speaking of it. No, they're not. Will SLCB be attacking those former SLF now ghosting their AA? Not every alliance has to attack ghosts. If they don't though will you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Bad Posted October 31, 2009 Report Share Posted October 31, 2009 Other than just being annoying what was the point of this? I don't know what was suppose to happen but, all I see is one of those guys attackiing IRON, TOP, and CTC. I though they were suppose to attack at least someone on purple? Well at least the Box guys have managed to make themselves the most annoying alliance everyone wants to see rolled. Thats a special gift considering the competiton. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingoist Posted October 31, 2009 Report Share Posted October 31, 2009 He joined SLF and is now SLCB again... http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_d...ation_ID=359559Edit: As per the permanently not letting people back in bit... this going to hold true? he misunderstood the post about this situation on our forums. he conducted no attacks in SLF nor did he do anything else wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarriorConcept Posted October 31, 2009 Report Share Posted October 31, 2009 Why must balls be the defining variable in a matter of courage vs. cowardliness? That's generally the connotation afforded to that term. Other than just being annoying what was the point of this? I don't know what was suppose to happen but, all I see is one of those guys attackiing IRON, TOP, and CTC. I though they were suppose to attack at least someone on purple? Well at least the Box guys have managed to make themselves the most annoying alliance everyone wants to see rolled. Thats a special gift considering the competiton. That guy is only a 19 day old nation who I'm pretty sure has no idea what's going on. Thanks for trying though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebel Virginia Posted October 31, 2009 Report Share Posted October 31, 2009 No, they're not. I have yet to have been proven false. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarriorConcept Posted October 31, 2009 Report Share Posted October 31, 2009 I have yet to have been proven false. No. Go along now this thread isn't about you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Bad Posted October 31, 2009 Report Share Posted October 31, 2009 That's generally the connotation afforded to that term. That guy is only a 19 day old nation who I'm pretty sure has no idea what's going on. Thanks for trying though. Well he managed to change AAs attack IRON and the Citadel and then change AAs back. So you say is he to new to do this on his own? Are you suggesting he was ordered to attack them? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brenann Posted October 31, 2009 Report Share Posted October 31, 2009 he misunderstood the post about this situation on our forums. he conducted no attacks in SLF nor did he do anything else wrong. interesting to see the backpedaling continue Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarriorConcept Posted October 31, 2009 Report Share Posted October 31, 2009 Well he managed to change AAs attack IRON and the Citadel and then change AAs back. So you say is he to new to do this on his own? Are you suggesting he was ordered to attack them? Yes it's obviously all a plot for SLCB to use a 19 day old nation to have IRON and Citadel attack them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarriorConcept Posted October 31, 2009 Report Share Posted October 31, 2009 interesting to see the backpedaling continue So because he did nothing wrong on another AA he should never be allowed to rejoin? Right Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stetson76 Posted October 31, 2009 Report Share Posted October 31, 2009 he misunderstood the post about this situation on our forums. he conducted no attacks in SLF nor did he do anything else wrong. Did he think SLCB was changing it's name? Otherwise, he clearly intended to leave SLCB "permanently". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brenann Posted October 31, 2009 Report Share Posted October 31, 2009 So because he did nothing wrong on another AA he should never be allowed to rejoin? Right If a Gov of SLCB says that if they leave they are permanently not allowed to be SLCB again, then yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnum T. Gundraw Posted October 31, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 31, 2009 Yes it's obviously all a plot for SLCB to use a 19 day old nation to have IRON and Citadel attack them WarriorConcept sees through all the lies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Bad Posted October 31, 2009 Report Share Posted October 31, 2009 Yes it's obviously all a plot for SLCB to use a 19 day old nation to have IRON and Citadel attack them You just said That guy is only a 19 day old nation who I'm pretty sure has no idea what's going on. Thanks for trying though. So what are to trying to say? He had no idea what is going on so he did not do it on his own. At the same time you say no one told him to? Well then just how did it happen? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.