edikroma Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 That was...actually a great read. Did a very good job of summarizing the week's events, and kept the bias to a relative minimum. A lot better than sifting through 20+ of trolling and repetitive posting... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hell Scream Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 Seriously, I mean wow, finally someone stood up and said, “We are not just cancelling cause we have bad communication skills.” Seriously, I was getting real tired of making fun of you people, so a tip of the hat to FOK for relieving me of my duties. No bull !@#$ flag will be thrown over this one. Did you ever read the thread where VE cancelled on GGA and NPO? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rickyman1984 Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 Very interesting issue. I laughed, I cried, I ate a sandwich. 4 Stars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merrie Melodies Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 We need a chairman hal card. They already exist, there are 2 per deck, they are called "Joker" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guffey Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 keep this up. It makes catching things a bit easier if i don't see an announcment. i like. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogar Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 (edited) I need coffee. Edited April 16, 2009 by Mogar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Medraut Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 Entertaining and enlightening at the same time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jens of the desert Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 There's no way I'm reading all of that....and you say it's edited???Good luck with whatever it is you say you are trying to do. It really couldn't be much easier to read through. Nice one trashcat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bernkastel Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 Great read as always, Stumpy. The trashcat hungers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Van Hoo III Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 Lacks Nemesis, therefore lacks awesome. I got two mentions. Keep up the good work, Stumpz. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vilien Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 (edited) Great work as always, Stumpy. Your genius is the fuel for my awesome-powered rocket. We're going to the moon. Edited April 16, 2009 by Vilien Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stumpy Jung Il Posted April 16, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 I'll talk, it's too bad you didn't quote me about complacency though. One TPF member, who I wont mention, didnt remind me to add it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
empirica Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 Fascinating read. I shall subscribe to your fine newsletter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vijaya Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 You've outdone yourself once again! Thank you for the read. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AirMe Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 Im not running around telling everyone about freedom. I expose the double standards of hypocrites who call for their version of freedom and oppose any opposition. You need to remember your roots son. Stumpy threw away a lot to attempt to protect you from nowedge aggression. He defended BAPS at every turn. But, how soon we forget ........ And they tell CnG we snuggle with pit vipers......... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alterego Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 (edited) You need to remember your roots son. Stumpy threw away a lot to attempt to protect you from nowedge aggression. He defended BAPS at every turn. But, how soon we forget ........ And they tell CnG we snuggle with pit vipers......... BAPS members past and present will never forget that. In the year or so following that war Stumpy has been one of the alliances most outspoken critics despite signing an unbreakable friendship treaty and being a former treaty partner. Each stinging blow alone was not that bad, but over a long enough time line you have to question whether Stumpy actually considered BAPS friends. While the last GW was still raging we signed a treaty with them and after their surrender but while we still continued with the defense of our other allies we aided them over $100m. At the time we had around 45 members and were significantly smaller, but we were happy to return the favour they once did for BAPS and thus helped them with rebuilding. This constant criticism turned people like myself against him. We will never forget an ally, but at some point the ally has to cut you some slack and stop doing what he already knew he was doing (The BFF treaty covers this behavoir) I would doubt any other alliances ability to accept that kind of abuse from someone who professed to be a friend without some kind of reaction and snowballing of the issue. Article V: StumpyTDSM8 and BAPS both know that Stumpy is a massive ******. He throws fits, over exaggerates things, and trolls uncontrollably. We love him to death, but seriously hes a complete butt. Both alliances agree to shrug off and ignore what ever Stumpy says, even if he holds his breath. Edited April 16, 2009 by Alterego Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stumpy Jung Il Posted April 16, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 (edited) BAPS members past and present will never forget that. In the year or so following that war Stumpy has been one of the alliances most outspoken critics despite signing an unbreakable friendship treaty and being a former treaty partner. Each stinging blow alone was not that bad, but over a long enough time line you have to question whether Stumpy actually considered BAPS friends. While the last GW was still raging we signed a treaty with them and after their surrender but while we still continued with the defense of our other allies we aided them over $100m. At the time we had around 45 members or so but we were happy to return the favour they once did for BAPS and thus helped them with rebuilding. This constant criticism turned people like myself against him. We will never forget an ally, but at some point the ally has to cut you some slack and stop doing what he already knew he was doing (The BFF treaty covers this behavoir) I would doubt any other alliances ability to accept that kind of abuse from someone who professed to be a friend without some kind of reaction and snowballing of the issue. Alterego, BAPS and TDSM8's relation was always maintained at an OOC level ever since you refused to sign with us after the BAPS war. You know dang well that we tried several times to upgrade our treaty and get back to the same level that we had been with BAPS but due to IC ties (aka Valhalla) BAPS never wanted to realign with us. We are OOC friends from the war we fought side by side but we have not seen eye to eye on an IC point in well over a year. The treaty points out that we are friends but not allies. I showed you friendship but the fact remains you are on the other side and I will obviously be critical to the decisions that you make that I disagree with. You talk about jabs? Talk about getting abandoned after being rolled for you guys. We appreciated the aid and we have always been friendly to you guys, but you have sided with a side that we are openly critical to and who are our enemies making our relationship in the IC realm strained at best. I have sat back and let BAPS leave me behind because I long since accepted that our relationship was no longer an IC alliance and more an OOC friendship, I assumed that you guys had done the same. Edited April 16, 2009 by Stumpy Jung Il Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alterego Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 Alterego, BAPS and TDSM8's relation was always maintained at an OOC level ever since you refused to sign with us after the BAPS war. You know dang well that we tried several times to upgrade our treaty and get back to the same level that we had been with BAPS but due to IC ties (aka Valhalla) BAPS never wanted to realign with us. We are OOC friends from the war we fought side by side but we have not seen eye to eye on an IC point in well over a year. The treaty points out that we are friends but not allies. I showed you friendship but the fact remains you are on the other side and I will obviously be critical to the decisions that you make that I disagree with. You talk about jabs? Talk about getting abandoned after being rolled for you guys. We appreciated the aid and we have always been friendly to you guys, but you have sided with a side that we are openly critical to and who are our enemies making our relationship in the IC realm strained at best. I have sat back and let BAPS leave me behind because I long since accepted that our relationship was no longer an IC alliance and more an OOC friendship, I assumed that you guys had done the same. My final comment here to try and get the original issues back on track. TDSM8 are gone now anyway so I guess its out of date. Article I: General AwesomeTDSM8 and BAPS both agree to remain civil and awesome with each other despite what other people say or do. We agree to stay classy like the fine gentlemen we all are. Its how we do. Its how well always do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stumpy Jung Il Posted April 16, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 My final comment here to try and get the original issues back on track. TDSM8 are gone now anyway so I guess its out of date. We weren't doing it cause of what other people did. We were doing it cause of what you did with other people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 Stumpy getting on people's nerves again? Just incredible. Great issue, an. Looking forward to the next. The Trashcat Hungers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alterego Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 We weren't doing it cause of what other people did. We were doing it cause of what you did with other people. It means if the rest of the world is going to hell and at each others throats we would remain civil even if on opposing sides. Article II: Keeping it RealTDSM8 and BAPS both acknowledge that they may not end up on the same side of things. To show this, this treaty holds ZERO military obligations to either side. Last comment, goodnight Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stumpy Jung Il Posted April 16, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 (edited) It means if the rest of the world is going to hell and at each others throats we would remain civil even if on opposing sides.Last comment, goodnight Last I checked you could criticize without losing civility. Like now. If you want to continue this we should move it out of public view and certainly out of this thread. Also, for the last time, I didnt make the god dang card. Edited April 16, 2009 by Stumpy Jung Il Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 It means if the rest of the world is going to hell and at each others throats we would remain civil even if on opposing sides.Last comment, goodnight If he was that bad, ignore would be your friend, and the treaty would never have happened. I know Stumpy. The only time he really means anything is when he signs lines. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stumpy Jung Il Posted April 16, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 If he was that bad, ignore would be your friend, and the treaty would never have happened. I know Stumpy. The only time he really means anything is when he signs lines. Thanks Rey, I appreciate it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 Thanks Rey, I appreciate it. No problem, man. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.