The Zigur Posted April 6, 2017 Report Share Posted April 6, 2017 (edited) 3 hours ago, commander thrawn said: 3 years as a tech seller... that is sad. It might have been sad a few years ago, but with demand as it is many of us enjoy producing tech as a well-payed profession today. Edited April 6, 2017 by Immortan Junka Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Bad Posted April 6, 2017 Report Share Posted April 6, 2017 The only thing sad around here is all the crying. Man up, talk some smack and have some fun. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Masterchief777 Posted April 6, 2017 Report Share Posted April 6, 2017 On 4/4/2017 at 11:03 PM, Emperor Jason said: For the one of those is not aiding an alliance currently at war with another. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haflinger Posted April 6, 2017 Report Share Posted April 6, 2017 Impending declaration on Dark Templar in ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackatron Posted April 6, 2017 Report Share Posted April 6, 2017 1 hour ago, Masterchief777 said: There is also a bunch of aid from FTW and TSK, as well as from DBDC, this "CB" is only applied when it is "politically convenient" (IE it is simply a convenient way of providing pretext for expanding a war further to alliances you want to roll). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
commander thrawn Posted April 6, 2017 Report Share Posted April 6, 2017 8 hours ago, Immortan Junka said: It might have been sad a few years ago, but with demand as it is many of us enjoy producing tech as a well-payed profession today. Blah, blah, I would have thought you would be a tech raider, but I guess if being useless is your goal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monster Posted April 6, 2017 Report Share Posted April 6, 2017 1 hour ago, Blackatron said: There is also a bunch of aid from FTW and TSK, as well as from DBDC, this "CB" is only applied when it is "politically convenient" (IE it is simply a convenient way of providing pretext for expanding a war further to alliances you want to roll). So, basically most CBs ever used. There is a difference when alliances have several treaty links to one side and aid that side and other one-off deals. If we have motive to hit someone and they provide a CB, why not? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haflinger Posted April 6, 2017 Report Share Posted April 6, 2017 Because it's better to be honest and stop pretending. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Masterchief777 Posted April 6, 2017 Report Share Posted April 6, 2017 (edited) 48 minutes ago, Monster said: So, basically most CBs ever used. There is a difference when alliances have several treaty links to one side and aid that side and other one-off deals. If we have motive to hit someone and they provide a CB, why not? For your case sure and if Polar finds that DT aiding enemies when their allies are at war is acceptable then good on them I guess. Edited April 6, 2017 by Masterchief777 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Bad Posted April 6, 2017 Report Share Posted April 6, 2017 2 hours ago, Blackatron said: There is also a bunch of aid from FTW and TSK, as well as from DBDC, this "CB" is only applied when it is "politically convenient" (IE it is simply a convenient way of providing pretext for expanding a war further to alliances you want to roll). Yeah pretty much. This has only been how things have been done on Planet Bob since the start. Frankly if you do not take advantage of your enemies mistakes then you are an idiot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morphine Posted April 6, 2017 Report Share Posted April 6, 2017 28 minutes ago, The Big Bad said: Yeah pretty much. This has only been how things have been done on Planet Bob since the start. Frankly if you do not take advantage of your enemies mistakes then you are an idiot. CoTM is whose enemy? They haven't entered a conflict since their merge, they don't hold a senator normally, and they are treatied to Polars side of the sphere. So where exactly does anybody get that they are the enemy? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Zigur Posted April 6, 2017 Report Share Posted April 6, 2017 2 hours ago, commander thrawn said: Blah, blah, I would have thought you would be a tech raider, but I guess if being useless is your goal. Tech raiding is boring, instead I've built a producerist army. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Zigur Posted April 6, 2017 Report Share Posted April 6, 2017 (edited) 1 hour ago, Monster said: So, basically most CBs ever used. There is a difference when alliances have several treaty links to one side and aid that side and other one-off deals. If we have motive to hit someone and they provide a CB, why not? 1 hour ago, Haflinger said: Because it's better to be honest and stop pretending. To be fair that was pretty honest. People are actually using CB's, which is a massive upgrade from dance videos and slogans last year. Edited April 6, 2017 by Immortan Junka Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auctor Posted April 6, 2017 Report Share Posted April 6, 2017 Are we really still too ludicrously hyperliteral as to pretend we see every single CB not being acted upon as somehow invalidating every single CB? Good luck going forward, gang. Lemme know how that works for you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Masterchief777 Posted April 6, 2017 Report Share Posted April 6, 2017 24 minutes ago, Auctor said: Are we really still too ludicrously hyperliteral as to pretend we see every single CB not being acted upon as somehow invalidating every single CB? Good luck going forward, gang. Lemme know how that works for you. Not every CB needs to be acted upon so that statement is correct, likewise if Polar is comfortable with DT aiding enemies of their allies then again, good on them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlmightyGrub Posted April 6, 2017 Report Share Posted April 6, 2017 3 hours ago, Masterchief777 said: Not every CB needs to be acted upon so that statement is correct, likewise if Polar is comfortable with DT aiding enemies of their allies then again, good on them. Give peace a chance? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morphine Posted April 6, 2017 Report Share Posted April 6, 2017 (edited) 18 minutes ago, AlmightyGrub said: Give peace a chance? You could try - especially when your indirectly allied to said AAs. Or when their allies are fighting alongside you in a different war.. Edited April 6, 2017 by Morphine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex0827a Posted April 7, 2017 Report Share Posted April 7, 2017 14 hours ago, The Big Bad said: The only thing sad around here is all the crying. Man up, talk some smack and have some fun. I did, but nobody from Polar or MHA will declare on me... Please do it, so I can get some medals on the CotM forums!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlmightyGrub Posted April 7, 2017 Report Share Posted April 7, 2017 3 hours ago, Morphine said: You could try - especially when your indirectly allied to said AAs. Or when their allies are fighting alongside you in a different war.. I do not believe in the concept of ''indirectly allied''. It is pure nonsense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morphine Posted April 7, 2017 Report Share Posted April 7, 2017 1 hour ago, AlmightyGrub said: I do not believe in the concept of ''indirectly allied''. It is pure nonsense. If you respect your friends - Then you respect their friends. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlmightyGrub Posted April 7, 2017 Report Share Posted April 7, 2017 1 minute ago, Morphine said: If you respect your friends - Then you respect their friends. Once again, pure nonsense. You may well like that as a concept, but it is a fantasy. Here and elsewhere. This myth is a large reason for the stagnation of this sphere. You think because I am allied to Non Grata and the NPO that I should automatically be friends with all of OC? or any of OC or all of their mates as well. Hardly. It is why you can not comprehend that Polar isn't a toadie for OC. We have treaties, they mean something. Beyond that it is for someone other than Polar to deal with. Surrender your fantasies and the truth will set you free. If you want to demonstrate your commitment to someone put a ring on it, if not who gives a !@#$ what they think, do or say? I am not allied to the random friends my allies have. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zero-One Posted April 7, 2017 Report Share Posted April 7, 2017 10 hours ago, Morphine said: CoTM is whose enemy? They haven't entered a conflict since their merge, they don't hold a senator normally, and they are treatied to Polars side of the sphere. So where exactly does anybody get that they are the enemy? If the economy is constantly under threat by idiotic senate votes, and after many unsuccessful diplomatic attempts, military force will be utilized to remove such threats. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auctor Posted April 7, 2017 Report Share Posted April 7, 2017 12 hours ago, Masterchief777 said: Not every CB needs to be acted upon so that statement is correct, likewise if Polar is comfortable with DT aiding enemies of their allies then again, good on them. This is a position an alliance like GATO should appreciate more than most. There are those that would see an ally being attacked for what from their point of view is an illegitimate reason as a CB, but clearly yall have chosen to emphasize some reasons to go to war and not others. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Zigur Posted April 7, 2017 Report Share Posted April 7, 2017 11 hours ago, AlmightyGrub said: Once again, pure nonsense. You may well like that as a concept, but it is a fantasy. Here and elsewhere. This myth is a large reason for the stagnation of this sphere. That doesnt make much sense because first you say that it is a fantasy, and then you say it has an effect ("stagnation"), therefore not a fantasy. You're not going to develop a very harmonious power sphere of your own if you don't account for the needs of your allies... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrinkledStraw Posted April 7, 2017 Report Share Posted April 7, 2017 11 hours ago, Zero-One said: If the economy is constantly under threat by idiotic senate votes, and after many unsuccessful diplomatic attempts, military force will be utilized to remove such threats. That's rich. Did you just put a collection of buzzwords into an app, press jumble, and then copy/paste this sentence, because it literally makes zero sense. Please reference even one "diplomatic attempt" that was made between Umbrella and CoTM before your DOWless sneak attack. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.