Generalchow Posted December 17, 2014 Report Share Posted December 17, 2014 Don't worry bro you're still part of the pact :P I hope this pact serves as a warning for any AA's fighting back against raids will get their lower tiers torn apart. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stonewall14 Posted December 17, 2014 Author Report Share Posted December 17, 2014 (edited) We will crush anyone who opposes us...o/ Nuclear Jihad :war: Edited December 17, 2014 by Stonewall14 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
murtibing Posted December 17, 2014 Report Share Posted December 17, 2014 I like this treaty. Congratulations! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smurthwaite Posted December 17, 2014 Report Share Posted December 17, 2014 Unfortunately, upon consultation with fellow Jihad's and our government officials it is with regret we rescind this offer to Tywin. Despite him being a potent war weapon, bamboozling our enemies with crap upon utter crap. We would have to listen to him during peacetime and peacetime can last ages! O/US thanks for your support! Then I must neglect to condone such tomfoolery. Good day with you, sir. I said, "Good day"! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stonewall14 Posted December 17, 2014 Author Report Share Posted December 17, 2014 (edited) Per Article III any new members must be added by full unanimous vote of all signatories, thank you for your patience...o/ Edited December 17, 2014 by Stonewall14 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starfox101 Posted December 18, 2014 Report Share Posted December 18, 2014 (edited) Don't worry bro you're still part of the pact :P I hope this pact serves as a warning for any AA's fighting back against raids will get their lower tiers torn apart. Wait, you're implying that if a member of this group raids our alliance, we should surrender and let it happen, or this grouping will attack our lower tier? You might want to quickly revise that part of your plan. It won't work that way. Edited December 18, 2014 by Starfox101 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auctor Posted December 18, 2014 Report Share Posted December 18, 2014 Wait, you're implying that if a member of this group raids our alliance, we should surrender and let it happen, or this grouping will attack our lower tier? You might want to quickly revise that part of your plan. It won't work that way. Don't ruin the surprise! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stonewall14 Posted December 18, 2014 Author Report Share Posted December 18, 2014 (edited) Wait, you're implying that if a member of this group raids our alliance, we should surrender and let it happen, or this grouping will attack our lower tier? You might want to quickly revise that part of your plan. It won't work that way. This is not true and is not part of the parameters outlined in this pact nor does General Chow speak for Nuclear Jihad. He is not a member of this pact at this time pending unanimous vote to admit him and his band of merry marauders per Article III...I apologize on behalf of Nuclear Jihad for any confusion in regards to members and parameters of our pact...thank you for your patience and God Bless! o/ Edited December 18, 2014 by Stonewall14 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eejack Posted December 18, 2014 Report Share Posted December 18, 2014 Wait, you're implying that if a member of this group raids our alliance, we should surrender and let it happen, or this grouping will attack our lower tier? You might want to quickly revise that part of your plan. It won't work that way. Sure it will because they have absolutely no regard for their nations. Many have more posts than infra. You cannot apply normal standards to folks who fling poo and call it art, who consider construction wasteful and destruction accomplishment. Folks who revel in failure like pigs in mud. It does not matter what anyone else says or thinks of them, they believe they are doing well. I'm actually somewhat jealous of the mental disconnect that requires. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unknown Smurf Posted December 18, 2014 Report Share Posted December 18, 2014 Sure it will because they have absolutely no regard for their nations. Many have more posts than infra. You cannot apply normal standards to folks who fling poo and call it art, who consider construction wasteful and destruction accomplishment. Folks who revel in failure like pigs in mud. It does not matter what anyone else says or thinks of them, they believe they are doing well. I'm actually somewhat jealous of the mental disconnect that requires. Because you conforming to the way its been for years requires mental exertion? Let them play differently if they want to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eejack Posted December 18, 2014 Report Share Posted December 18, 2014 Because you conforming to the way its been for years requires mental exertion? Let them play differently if they want to. They can play as differently as they want - that was the point of my post - they ain't playing the same game as anyone else, however if I wish to chide for creating their own standards because they couldn't keep up, then I shall do so. They did make a pretty picture in the OP, I'll give them that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starfox101 Posted December 18, 2014 Report Share Posted December 18, 2014 This is not true and is not part of the parameters outlined in this pact nor does General Chow speak for Nuclear Jihad. He is not a member of this pact at this time pending unanimous vote to admit him and his band of merry marauders per Article III...I apologize on behalf of Nuclear Jihad for any confusion in regards to members and parameters of our pact...thank you for your patience and God Bless! o/ Sounds good. Might want to avoid starting off making statements like his, and right away admitting him. Sure it will because they have absolutely no regard for their nations. Many have more posts than infra. You cannot apply normal standards to folks who fling poo and call it art, who consider construction wasteful and destruction accomplishment. Folks who revel in failure like pigs in mud. It does not matter what anyone else says or thinks of them, they believe they are doing well. I'm actually somewhat jealous of the mental disconnect that requires. Well, to be fair I have more posts than infra as well. :p Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister black Posted December 18, 2014 Report Share Posted December 18, 2014 wtf. why would u say chow is a part of it, then recind his name becuase of a statement? first post. bottom of the list te badman of badlands emperor chow. shit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pastor Jason Posted December 19, 2014 Report Share Posted December 19, 2014 Congratz gents Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Generalchow Posted December 19, 2014 Report Share Posted December 19, 2014 (edited) wtf. why would u say chow is a part of it, then recind his name becuase of a statement? first post. bottom of the list te badman of badlands emperor chow. !@#$ Don't worry about it bro. Edited December 19, 2014 by Generalchow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xanth Posted December 19, 2014 Report Share Posted December 19, 2014 Wtf I'd going on here? And member of sra that takes part in any non government sanctioned raid is subject to instant removal from the alliance without trial or explanation. All members of SRA already know this though so I should expect this not to be an issue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stonewall14 Posted December 19, 2014 Author Report Share Posted December 19, 2014 Wtf I'd going on here? And member of sra that takes part in any non government sanctioned raid is subject to instant removal from the alliance without trial or explanation. All members of SRA already know this though so I should expect this not to be an issue. It's not an issue that I know of and this is not a raiders pact, it is a pact of a group of allied friends who pledge our friendship and mutual allegiance to each other... :awesome: We are still complaint and loyal to our present alliances above all else and of course will abide by our rules and charters as always... :mellow: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Generalchow Posted December 19, 2014 Report Share Posted December 19, 2014 So according to Stonewall this Nuclear Jihad treaty is pretty much useless. It literally changes nothing, was there even any point announcing this? Seems to me that it is just bringing attention to your pact, but in truth some members of this pact are not willing to work outside of their AA to protect each other. I still think the Amigo pact is better. This is like a cheap copy of it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arentak Posted December 19, 2014 Report Share Posted December 19, 2014 I like the idea of non-alliance alliances. The oppression of nations and suppresion of national sovereignity in favor of alliance sovereignity is a shame. We play CN to be presidents and kings, not citizens, yet alliances treat us as such. Hooray to these guys for daring to step outside the normal boundries. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister black Posted December 19, 2014 Report Share Posted December 19, 2014 (edited) mister black has nothing to say against this here so pact. Edited January 7, 2015 by Mister black Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glorton Posted December 20, 2014 Report Share Posted December 20, 2014 So according to Stonewall this Nuclear Jihad treaty is pretty much useless. It literally changes nothing, was there even any point announcing this? Seems to me that it is just bringing attention to your pact, but in truth some members of this pact are not willing to work outside of their AA to protect each other. I still think the Amigo pact is better. This is like a cheap copy of it. So because we wont be raiding it makes this pact useless? The other stuff about protecting your friends and defending them at all cost must mean nothing to you then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark Emperor Posted December 20, 2014 Report Share Posted December 20, 2014 Honestly this pact a pact between friends like they were saying...why would we want to raid and put each other in harms way or gain a bad reputation there be no point....I am sorry Chow but I have gained nothing from this except for the fact of not returning to a few alliances I do humbly enjoy. I got my broskies backs no matter the cost!...except claude...that dude ate my cake. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Layton Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 I agree with Chow. I don't see how it changes anything. This already existed informally and if the pact restricts those who sign it to obey their alliances above the pact itself, and their alliances forbid raiding...then I don't see how this can be effective. If things got real, I think most of the people here have each other's backs. This pact just formalizes it. I think it would be more effective if this were a pact between alliances or if the nations involved were in one alliance. Just my opinion. Good luck with this guys. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.