Sardonic Posted May 27, 2012 Report Share Posted May 27, 2012 Come back soon Steve! :< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoomzoomzoom Posted May 27, 2012 Report Share Posted May 27, 2012 Hopefully this leads to good things. Like the rolling of MXCA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beauty Posted May 27, 2012 Report Share Posted May 27, 2012 [quote name='Zoomzoomzoom' timestamp='1338153185' post='2973320'] Hopefully this leads to good things. Like the rolling of MXCA [/quote] MXCA has been on the top of the hit list of MCXA forever. Finally something we agree on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Franz Ferdinand Posted May 27, 2012 Report Share Posted May 27, 2012 [quote name='Rotavele' timestamp='1338160226' post='2973352'] MXCA has been on the top of the hit list of MCXA forever. Finally something we agree on. [/quote] I honestly thought it was The Sweet Oblivion who everybody had a distaste for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beauty Posted May 27, 2012 Report Share Posted May 27, 2012 (edited) [quote name='Franz Ferdinand' timestamp='1338160412' post='2973354'] I honestly thought it was The Sweet Oblivion who everybody had a distaste for. [/quote] Oh wow... I just looked, they are still here. [quote name='Jacapo Saladin' timestamp='1338092389' post='2973090'] Thanks for the sig, but you spelled my name wrong. [/quote] [quote name='Nikita Ilyich Lenin' timestamp='1338092578' post='2973093'] you've been replaced [/quote] [quote][08:05:42] <arexes[NG]> gopher [08:06:47] <Gopherbashi> hey [08:06:59] <arexes[NG]> can you tell rotavele to stop using that sig [08:07:25] <arexes[NG]> http://forums.cybern...dpost&p=2972907 [08:07:34] <arexes[NG]> I don't really like him pretending to be our mofa [08:08:52] <Gopherbashi> hmmmm [08:08:53] <Gopherbashi> yeah [08:08:59] <Gopherbashi> i'll pass that along [08:09:20] <arexes[NG]> thanks[/quote] In order to prevent NG from getting too upset, I will remove my signature. We dont want another merger or anything. Edited May 27, 2012 by Rotavele Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayatollah Bromeini Posted May 27, 2012 Report Share Posted May 27, 2012 Not even been in office for three days and already he's forcing his will upon other alliances. Monsters, all of you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Xander the Only Posted May 28, 2012 Author Report Share Posted May 28, 2012 [quote name='Ayatollah Bromeini' timestamp='1338161935' post='2973360'] Not even been in office for three days and already he's forcing his will upon other alliances. Monsters, all of you. [/quote] He's just a terrible person. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Groucho Marx Posted May 28, 2012 Report Share Posted May 28, 2012 Good luck Steve. Welcome back Arexes. NG, can you just make it to where Rotavele never speaks again? You would be doing everyone a favor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beauty Posted May 28, 2012 Report Share Posted May 28, 2012 [quote name='Emperor Marx' timestamp='1338165234' post='2973372'] Good luck Steve. Welcome back Arexes. NG, can you just make it to where Rotavele never speaks again? You would be doing everyone a favor. [/quote] Thats just too bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jgoods45 Posted May 28, 2012 Report Share Posted May 28, 2012 Would love to see a merger.. of MCXA's face with the ground. :> Welcome back arex! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duke Nukem Posted May 28, 2012 Report Share Posted May 28, 2012 [quote name='Jgoods45' timestamp='1338167000' post='2973392'] Would love to see a merger.. of MCXA's face with the ground. :> Welcome back arex! [/quote] Hasn't Int done that like twice now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jgoods45 Posted May 28, 2012 Report Share Posted May 28, 2012 [quote name='Duke Nukem' timestamp='1338167290' post='2973395'] Hasn't Int done that like twice now? [/quote] Third time's a charm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gloin Posted May 28, 2012 Report Share Posted May 28, 2012 [quote name='Zoomzoomzoom' timestamp='1338153185' post='2973320'] Hopefully this leads to good things. Like the rolling of MXCA [/quote] Couldn't agree more! But us agreeing makes me feel icky inside... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beauty Posted May 28, 2012 Report Share Posted May 28, 2012 (edited) The only reason you hate MCXA is because 1) Im in it and 2) Our slot efficiency is more than your alliance could dream of. So play with deez XD Edited May 28, 2012 by Rotavele Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krihelion Posted May 28, 2012 Report Share Posted May 28, 2012 i have hated mcxa since they started sucking, which was, a long time ago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cookavich Posted May 28, 2012 Report Share Posted May 28, 2012 zoom for tri, tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacapo Saladin Posted May 28, 2012 Report Share Posted May 28, 2012 [quote name='Rotavele' timestamp='1338179745' post='2973441'] The only reason you hate MCXA is because 1) Im in it and 2) Our slot efficiency is more than your alliance could dream of. So play with deez XD [/quote] Your average nation has 51% of the tech of our average nation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beauty Posted May 28, 2012 Report Share Posted May 28, 2012 [quote name='Jacapo Saladin' timestamp='1338180323' post='2973446'] Your average nation has 51% of the tech of our average nation. [/quote] And at the rate of your slot efficiency, that number grows smaller everyday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WorldConqueror Posted May 28, 2012 Report Share Posted May 28, 2012 [quote name='Rotavele' timestamp='1338179745' post='2973441'] The only reason you hate MCXA is because 1) Im in it and 2) Our slot efficiency is more than your alliance could dream of. So play with deez XD [/quote] Actually it's mostly SCY. You're just a terrible bonus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krihelion Posted May 28, 2012 Report Share Posted May 28, 2012 [quote name='Rotavele' timestamp='1338180635' post='2973447'] And at the rate of your slot efficiency, that number grows smaller everyday. [/quote] You have less then half of our members, plus you buy at 3/50. The second reason is one of the reasons MCXA is bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beauty Posted May 28, 2012 Report Share Posted May 28, 2012 [quote name='Unkajo' timestamp='1338181150' post='2973449'] You have less then half of our members, plus you buy at 3/50. The second reason is one of the reasons MCXA is bad. [/quote] No sir you have it all wrong, See we SELL at 3/50. Giving our nations more money and well, it makes our nations grow. Were not Umbrella by any chance. Our slots are extremely full (Larger then Umbrella's efficiency). So well, we have half your members, but thats not something you could brag about. As our members are active enough to complete tech deals, as yours seem to just sit there with empty slots. MCXA's war capabilities have been bragged about by many of our latest enemies. LSF is treatied to us now, ODN and INT have told us were pretty good in the battle field as well. So MCXA being "Bad" is more of because you just don't like us so you consider us bad. CSN is also viewed as "bad", but they're slot efficiency is currently at the top (Larger then MCXAs and Umbrellas) and trust me... Ive been in CSN, they know how to "war" NG considers all alliances bad because they simply cannot match them. See while you sit here and think of corny slogans, we complete tech deals. Guess which is the most effective. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duke Nukem Posted May 28, 2012 Report Share Posted May 28, 2012 [quote name='Unkajo' timestamp='1338180118' post='2973444'] i have hated mcxa since they started sucking, which was, a long time ago [/quote] Inb4 Unkajo joins MCXA. Once a hypocrite, always a hypocrite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beauty Posted May 28, 2012 Report Share Posted May 28, 2012 [quote name='Duke Nukem' timestamp='1338183066' post='2973458'] Inb4 Unkajo joins MCXA. Once a hypocrite, always a hypocrite. [/quote] I love you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krihelion Posted May 28, 2012 Report Share Posted May 28, 2012 [quote name='Rotavele' timestamp='1338183007' post='2973457'] No sir you have it all wrong, See we SELL at 3/50. Giving our nations more money and well, it makes our nations grow. Were not Umbrella by any chance. Our slots are extremely full (Larger then Umbrella's efficiency). So well, we have half your members, but thats not something you could brag about. As our members are active enough to complete tech deals, as yours seem to just sit there with empty slots. MCXA's war capabilities have been bragged about by many of our latest enemies. LSF is treatied to us now, ODN and INT have told us were pretty good in the battle field as well. So MCXA being "Bad" is more of because you just don't like us so you consider us bad. CSN is also viewed as "bad", but they're slot efficiency is currently at the top (Larger then MCXAs and Umbrellas) and trust me... Ive been in CSN, they know how to "war" NG considers all alliances bad because they simply cannot match them. See while you sit here and think of corny slogans, we complete tech deals. Guess which is the most effective. [/quote] MCXA has lost the last 4 conflicts it has been in. Most of them not even lasting a month. Try again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beauty Posted May 28, 2012 Report Share Posted May 28, 2012 (edited) [quote name='Unkajo' timestamp='1338184556' post='2973465'] MCXA has lost the last 4 conflicts it has been in. Most of them not even lasting a month. Try again [/quote] Well if Non Grata was on the other side of the war, and outnumbered 6:1, im sure it would have lost too. Edited May 28, 2012 by Rotavele Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts