Jump to content

CptGodzilla

Members
  • Posts

    1,149
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by CptGodzilla

  1. [quote name='Delta1212' timestamp='1296775857' post='2618336'] So in your master plan to hit Nordreich, you declare on FHU, thereby getting DT to declare on you, and then RIA counters DT, bringing in Nordreich on us so that you can defend us and hit them. How can it fail? [/quote] we could always pre-empt, that's what everyone seems to be doing now a days anyway, protect your protectorates
  2. [quote name='General Ozujsko' timestamp='1296762034' post='2617995'] Maybe this might help you. [url="http://www.cybernations.net/stats_alliance_stats_custom.asp?Alliance=Flying%20Hellfish%20United"]FHU[/url] & [url="http://www.cybernations.net/stats_alliance_stats_custom.asp?Alliance=Global%20Order%20of%20Darkness"]GOD[/url] Anyone with half a brain in their head knows Xiph wants a shot at Nordreich, what better way to curbstomp the protectorate of Nordreich's MDoAP ally (Never mind that NoR just signed an agreement to stay out of this corner of the war). [/quote] To tell you the truth, that wasn't the reason at all, although it is a plus Xiphosis ran out of targets on the UPN front and needed to fill his war quota for the month.
  3. [quote name='ImperialCubanacan' timestamp='1296740769' post='2617690'] Nordreich did not surrender and we sure as heck didn't lose this war. Who is down something like 1.7M NS and who is down only 300K NS from war-time inflation? At any rate, the war is over. So, good fight from wF and o/ to my fellow Nordlanders. [/quote] Your stats tell one story yet your political and tactical positioning tells another story. If you won so bad, why are you being tactically crippled (i.e. can't enter in on any more fronts to help allies) while wF enjoys the freedom to do so if they please?
  4. [quote name='Mayzie' timestamp='1296734312' post='2617622'] True, they should've just attacked any random alliance, right? [/quote] lets take a look at a few things. NoR jumped into the war on an OA against wF (who was already at war with a couple large alliances) After a week or so of war, they "declare peace" which can be viewed as a surrender, or even as a "tactical defeat". I say this because the terms systematically remove NoR from the current conflict, while wF is free to reengage in the current conflict NoR leaves 3 of their allies still on the battlefield, all of which could have probably used the numerical help I just think that NoR heard someone's drums beating and wanted to get out as fast as possible.
  5. [quote name='ratonbox' timestamp='1296734047' post='2617618'] Meh.. Crappy announcement.. poorly written and I only managed to get 1 day of war. Also.. ffs why do we always end up fighting against alliances that did nothing wrong to us? If this was a war against some crappy alliance that deserved to be pummeled, this announcement would've never happened. [/quote] not our fault you picked a weak target to minimize damage yet look like you were being useful
  6. [quote name='Ardus' timestamp='1296474963' post='2612868'] This is from one of those Spam Wars that ravaged the Maroon Team way back when, isn't it? [/quote] I believe it was a celebration when admin commented on the maroon capacity to spam (when our spam thread hit some obscene page total, like 2000 or something like that)
  7. [quote name='Edifice' timestamp='1296268515' post='2608347'] I think the CB is dying because the game itself provides no viable CBs. By now, everyone knows that spying isn't really worth the effort. Same goes with poaching, or aiding alliances at war, or whatever. Much easier to forgo these insignificant behaviors in exchange for peace. Furthermore, the game is so old, the 'societal' standards so well-established that anyone with half a brain following the general "how to avoid war" CN rulebook has nothing to worry about. When some incident pops up, those in the disadvantageous position will follow the rulebook. Everyone's an optimist, they'll always think that waiting things out will tip the scales in their favor later on. By the time that happens, the newly disadvantaged side will follow the same rulebook, and the same hopes. On the off-chance someone does something stupid and insufficient steps are taken, alliances will either ignore/cancel/not activate treaties to prevent escalation. I think the community needs to redefine what an acceptable CB is. I do agree that generally, noCB "we don't like you's" are pretty bland, too easy. Why not make certain actions alliances take that is pretty vital to their growth/well-being, and make them war-worthy? So, "stealing our tech deals" or "cancelling our trade circle" (lol yev) or "not voting for our senator".... some of these sound ridiculous, but that is the point! Alliances have to think at some point that war, even a losing war, is preferable to caving into ridiculous demands. Granted, the mechanics of the game is the biggest constraint on coming up with stuff that's actually worth going to war over (there is very little scarcity, a scarcity of scarcity ) but I would not rest my hopes on any changes being made in that realm. [/quote] I wouldn't mind seeing wars over tech sellers
  8. [img]http://images.wikia.com/cybernations/images/b/b4/2000postswu1.png[/img] even though it is from the previous forums, I think it should still hold up edit: and not completely on the OWF
  9. I would be more down for this if i didn't have to suffer the torture of all the MK members !@#$%*ing about the exact same things they are doing.. for the past 4 years. other than that, roll on Umbrella and GOONS
  10. Not used to GIMP (first time ever using it) but since photoshop is on my other computer, this will have to do [img]http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n38/CptGodzilla/Xiph0.png[/img]
  11. GATO after we're done with them http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pbo3MFzNZjQ&feature=related
  12. those logs are about as fake as these ones, aren't they? [quote] [00:02] <chels[LoSS_MoFA]> ck we will make u guys kiss our *** [00:02] <legion-x[LOSS]> chels cant do anything about it [00:03] <legion-x[LOSS]> i get to declare [00:03] <Morphine[LoSS]> she can make less of a war than I can [00:03] <MrDamsky> I'll duel someone from LoSS [00:03] <Emperor_Whimsical[GOD]> <chels[LoSS_MoFA]> ck we will make u guys kiss our *** <---Declare war please [00:03] <MrDamsky> You got anyone in the 8k NS Range? [00:03] <Emperor_Whimsical[GOD]> Damsky [00:03] <WhiteMajik> LOL 8k [00:03] <legion-x[LOSS]> ATTACK an ally and we will [00:03] <Emperor_Whimsical[GOD]> their whole alliance is in the 8k range [00:03] <&Big_Z[GOD]> Lol, not much of a MoFA are you? [00:03] <Emperor_Whimsical[GOD]> "I'll show you" [00:03] <chels[LoSS_MoFA]> $%&@ u [00:03] <Emperor_Whimsical[GOD]> "lol do it" [00:03] <chels[LoSS_MoFA]> !@#$%^ [00:03] <Emperor_Whimsical[GOD]> "ATTACK US" [00:03] <Emperor_Whimsical[GOD]> classy. [00:03] <MrDamsky> chels[LoSS_MoFA] [00:03] <chels[LoSS_MoFA]> yea? [00:03] <Morphine[LoSS]> don't mess with the chels[LoSS_MoFA] she gets angry[/quote] yes CSN, please burn this scum to the ground
  13. [quote name='Omniscient1' timestamp='1295683814' post='2591555'] Xiph you're fighting UPN. What did you expect That is quite a gain for being at war though. Was it any of it ghosts? [/quote] notice the +0 next to our name? we ain't got no ghosts
  14. [quote name='UnLimited' timestamp='1295686112' post='2591602'] 13 wars so.. it almost beats UPN's blitz [/quote] at least they're hitting the right targets Also, TTK and CRAP both hold a treaty with GOD, who was in the war well before RIA or GATO so to think that the attack on RIA is the only reason they joined is dumb.
  15. fear the cactuar http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nFCiyBuvfmk&feature=related
  16. yo GATO lemme help you out (i saw this a few weeks ago and figured it fits) [img]http://www.nine2000.com/thon07/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/going-to-chambr-of-sekrets.jpg[/img]
  17. [quote name='Kowalski' timestamp='1295518637' post='2586046'] True but that doesn't really answer the question. Hoo left claiming that he wanted to honour the treaty he signed, why would he join NpO to do that if RoK were always going to honour it? [/quote] Well since I am not in the loop anymore, the only thing i can do is guess based on what i know. One of the biggest things that i do know is that recently Hoo hasn't been active (which can be seen by his stepping down as emperor) and from what it seems from all the threads and rumors spreading like wildfire, only a few select people knew what was actually going on (you know, the way things like this should be) So logically one could induce that Hoo recently became active seeing there was a big war. He talks to some people who he trusts, they don't know the full truth on what is going on, thus his opinion is slightly skewed. He leaves RoK only to find out that he left for no reason at all Again, this is only based on what I know about the situation and the people involved, the former being limited.
  18. [quote name='Antoine Roquentin' timestamp='1295513650' post='2585990'] Honestly, if that's the case it begs the question: why did Hoo leave? [/quote] saying this as a friend and not as an insult. Not the first time he's left RoK, and if he ever decides to rejoin RoK, it won't be the last time he has left RoK. as for the actual topic of RoK and not the topic of Hoo Good luck RoK, there are certain people in PC who ruined that whole alliance to me, so roll them good.
  19. your theory is broken skippy - http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=136116 66k NS roughly 1.5 million casualties according to you he should be an alright leaders... but he's a terrible leader.
  20. [quote name='JWConner' timestamp='1294350271' post='2566254'] Nothing should be given to Penkala as compensation. He brought it upon himself. He likes to cause problems, and someone did something about it. Such is life. [/quote] As much trouble as penkala makes, i will throw this out there. the Penkala - VA drama is as much Penkala's fault as it is VA's fault. After dealing with it multiple times, both sides (one side an individual and one side an [i]alliance[/i]) can be childish and don't want to give it up.
  21. VFABIC blast from the past, eh? also, voted D: florida and I checked every option except this one
  22. [quote name='Some-Guy' timestamp='1293500819' post='2555706'] Sure, we disagreed a fair amount, but I didn't (and indeed don't) hate GOD. Why would you say such a thing?!? The only people from Karma that I hate(d) reside in NPO, since their [i]stupid[/i] actions during peace negotiations with OV put TOP in a amazingly crap position. And, do you know what? I'm kinda over it now. [/quote] funny, I hate TOP for almost the exact same reason. the [i]stupid[/i] actions during the war put GOD in an amazingly crap position.
  23. [quote name='KainIIIC' timestamp='1291790846' post='2533729'] I was anticipating this for the last 8 months, so I guess this finally happened. Cpt Godzilla was just no KaitlinK it seems. Oh well, have fun in a WickedJless (and thus slightly better ) CSN. [/quote] Ive actually been gone from MA for a few months. As for those saying "10 months too late" ect. are obviously those who have never been in a leadership role of an alliance. It's one thing to be in govt. and vote to merge, but it's a completely different feeling and set of responsibilities to be a leader and come to this decision. There is always going to be a group of people who magically show up and don't want to give up, there are always those select few who withstand the whole ordeal trying to help out, and then there are the ones who think they know what is best, but don't do !@#$ about it. That being said, good luck in CSN OOC - should have let me know like a month ago i wouldn't have renewed the domain name
×
×
  • Create New...