CptGodzilla

[quote name='Jrenster' timestamp='1281548025' post='2411279'] I agree. But I misread a lot of things too, especially when I'm chatting with someone. Admittedly, I tend to skip over words a lot, so I suppose I understand where Heft is coming from. [b] But I do think it is a bit weird that they attacked the guy even after we told them that he would be under our protection.[/b] [/quote] because he was at war with RoK's protectorate before he even joined NSO

[quote name='agafaba' timestamp='1281543767' post='2411175'] RoK also declared war before NSO provided any aid. So it was just between Sedric and his former alliance, then RoK joined in, then NSO joined in. [/quote] Sedric's former alliance happens to be a protectorate of RoK.

[quote name='Merrie Melodies' timestamp='1281542821' post='2411159'] Yes I will consider it an act of war. And to answer your question, they are unaligned, they have taken no action to be afforded protection. I am curious though, is NSO an alliance who allowed raiding now in the business of protecting the unaligned? [/quote] Oh no! We found out NSO's deep dark secret. Lint wad is actually the reincarnation of walford

[quote name='Haflinger' timestamp='1281541892' post='2411145'] Yes, we are aware that the CB is disobeying Hoo. [/quote] oh, ok. Just making sure that is clear...

[quote name='Learz' timestamp='1281540862' post='2411138'] [url="http://cybernations.wikia.com/wiki/Popcorn_War"]Exhibit A.[/url] Exhibit B: This is Planet Bob. Nothing is private here But it is interesting, yes? This whole thing comes down to whether NSO had a right in getting involved. "Our" side says yes, due to, uh, Moldavi II, anti-raiding policies, membership in NSO, common logic, whatever. "Your" side says no due to, umm, unaligned being scum that should be kicked off this planet, I dunno. What is clear, however, is that NSO has a strong case for getting involved; [i]FAR [/i]stronger, I'm sure you'll agree, than RoK&Co's case for declaring war. [/quote] The only part of this whole story that matters is the part where Hoo told heft not to aid him and heft decides to aid him.

[quote name='magicninja' timestamp='1281462220' post='2409904'] Yes, but do alliances pound other alliances for aiding a tech raid target? Hell, I would appreciate someone sending them money for me to raid. [/quote] alliances do it when they tell you they are going to pound you if you aid the tech raid target.... and you do it anyway

[quote name='Viking' timestamp='1281436285' post='2409468'] I talked like this when \m/ was beating down my alliance in GWIII. Try again. Why don't you go ask some old time R&R'ers how I handled negotiations with Philo back then. [/quote] hahaha, it was rather funny. also good luck GOD.

MA will claim cuba in maroon color. I believe it is 10 or 11 territories

[quote name='Edifice' timestamp='1280630905' post='2396635'] Updated. [url="http://imgur.com/aSHuF.png"]http://imgur.com/aSHuF.png[/url] CSN - I couldn't give you guys Denmark, but you got the Germany/SKorea. MA - We keep missing each other in edits--I gave you guys the area you wanted specified in your picture. Too many claims on Scandanavia; you guys had to share. Need color please. [/quote] heh, that's fine FnKa wanted that area anyway

Monos Archein will take 10 territories nvm we were added, new england area, thanks

This is truly a sad day for R&R

[quote name='Emporor' timestamp='1280129879' post='2389507'] Wow, you are probably the best argument yet... but, being smart in this case.. makes them cowards. But, I agree with you, to a certain extent. They are ignorant however to go around picking fights with alliances such as MA, who could roll them.. so lets not give them to much credit. [/quote] They weren't picking on MA as there was no concrete way to tell if there was protection there or not.

I guess I should explain some things. I was not posting this thread specifically at GOONS in any type of retaliatory action. I noticed from the conversation that if raids were to occur again in the future, that I would be put in the same predicament. Since no official notice of SoL's merger into MA was made, there was no initial thread for me to convey the protection of the AA. I generally don't know what I'm doing when it comes to the cybernations wiki, so I was unsure if there was a specified place to provide notice of protection. The GOONS member did everything they could when deciding if they could raid or not. I had no problem with the raids because it was my fault for not making sure people knew of the protection. I also could have timed this thread differently, as I was not aiming this at GOONS. I was planning on letting the whole "back channels" thing work itself out. The whole purpose of this thread is to provide public notice of protection to the AA of Soldiers of Legion (note: I have a list of all the members of the alliance before the merge and won't allow people to use the AA to try to hide) and not to "bash" GOONS or discredit them in any way.

since apparently this is something that needs to be publicly stated, the AA of 'Soldiers of Legion' is under the protection of Monos Archein indefinitely.

[quote name='D34th' date='21 July 2010 - 01:39 PM' timestamp='1279737580' post='2382905'] Yes, if I join #The_Chief channel I'll be spying on \m/? Also I'm not saying this is less wrong but spy a personal channel is not the same thing of spy in a alliance private channel And where's the proofs? Also sorry Kevanovia my grammar fail [s]sometimes[/s] always. [/quote] you're making the same mistake i was. Spamalot is an alliance not a person.

[quote name='supercoolyellow' date='21 July 2010 - 01:19 PM' timestamp='1279736330' post='2382858'] First, Pnekala, you've been pulling so much crap lately, that I don't really care what alliance you decide to go after lately I just don't. [b]Second, if Chimaera has made a mistake, he's certainly earned the right to make a few mistakes. [/b] Thirdly, thanks for this inappropriate OOC moment. [/quote] So after a few years of dedicated service, you are allowed to spy on other alliances? I wish I knew of this rule sooner.

[quote name='nippy' date='20 May 2010 - 06:07 PM' timestamp='1274396848' post='2305923'] Case in point: [url="http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=226976"]THIS NATION[/url] is one I decided to raid back in the beginning of April. I took a look at his time in AA, the number of people in his AA, checked Monos Archein's wiki, checked the CN boards, and found no possible way this person was actually protected by Monos Archein. Through friendly PM's with this person, he stated that he was amazed that it had taken people that long to figure out his AA was bogus. I peaced out with him while suggesting he join a real alliance, possibly GOONS, if he was interested. He said he'd give it some thought. A month passes, he's still sitting in his bogus AA and is not being raided because people see 'Monos Archein' in his bio and AA. I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable. This means any damn nation out there can change their bio to say 'protected by (insert random real alliance here)' and this means they're off-limits. As a techraider and alliance leader on this planet, I strongly disagree with your 'paperless protection' policies, and I hope you can see why after this statement. We teach our raiders to research targets prior to attacking...if there's no documentation, there's no valid documentation of actual protection, and the only solid evidence is the word of the nation being targeted. [/quote] If he feels the need to say it's a bogus AA, then attack him. But over a year ago, a deal was struck between a previous leader and him to provide him with protection for one reason or other.

Other than your own, I don't see any other signatures on here

[quote name='LokiLockpicker' date='18 May 2010 - 07:42 PM' timestamp='1274229749' post='2302618'] Interesting words. So you must take offense to your own words in your previous post, wanting USN to disband, as your alliance is tied to the USN. Back to topic: It's sad when an alliance finally decides that the bloc they are in is not going the way it needs to be going. Good luck in your future endeavors TYR [/quote] It's not if losing USN from my NAP pact would create some giant hole in my heart.

[quote name='fluffyewunga' date='18 May 2010 - 04:22 PM' timestamp='1274217739' post='2302433'] Maybe u should follow your own advice. My comment could neither be considered good or bad but purly neurtal. Your on the other hand is fueled with hate about an allaince u know nothing about. USN is no1's meatshield. If u would care to show when we have ever wared due to our UPN treaty i'd be greatly ammused since i must have slept through that 1 [/quote] It's not your UPN treaty that causes USN to act as UPN's shield. Also expecting someone to leave a bloc I am tied to is considered bad, and I take offense to the fact that you think something I am allied to is going to fail.

[quote name='fluffyewunga' date='18 May 2010 - 06:02 AM' timestamp='1274180532' post='2302071'] I've been expecting some1 to leave TT since the war. Was 50/50 who. [/quote] yeah, and I've been hoping you disband that excuse you call an alliance. (although the rest of us call it UPN's meat shield) If you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all. On the other hand, good luck TYR and I have high hopes for ARES and TT

Congrats to the new government, especially Silver on the MoFA spot.

[quote name='Canik' date='06 May 2010 - 11:26 PM' timestamp='1273206381' post='2289847'] Less talk. More nukes! [/quote] You've seen what i've done with my nukes. also congrats GOONS and GOD

[quote name='Rebel Virginia' date='06 May 2010 - 10:06 PM' timestamp='1273201577' post='2289687'] [color="#0000ff"]So, I take it GOD has decided to join GOONS in needlessly harassing FEAR? Well, I suppose you fellows need someone to take your inferiority complexes out on.[/color] [/quote] [b]your allies in GOD[/b] have been harassing FEAR way before GOONS started

Me and some other dude (can't remember his name) raced to be the first nation with 25 nukes. Can't remember who got there first.