Jump to content

Farnsworth

Members
  • Posts

    1,119
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Farnsworth

  1. This is some quality commie drama! It's been awhile since you guys have produced anything remotely interesting. Well done!
  2. I'd like to thank all those that are making it possible for DT to reach a new recored high rank so often! Lulz.
  3. I think Walsh's idea makes more since. I wouldn't "spread out" the votes -- there's still only 3 options. 1. Something involving the word "Disorder" 2, Something involving }Order on/upon/vs. Order" 3. Something involving "Following Orders" Once the category is selected, people can then vote on specifics. For example, if 1 polled highest, the next poll would be: 1. Order Upon Order 2. Order On Order 3. Order on Order on Order I'd like GW# for continuity's sake, but it seems hard to justify since we didn't stick with the GW# formula for previous large scale wars. I like Disorder, Following Orders, and OoO/OuO. I will say, though, that OoO sounds better to say while OuO looks better. Both the OoO and OuO options sound less than ideal when spoken in a sentence. Note how LAME all of these sound: "Remember during the Order on Order War how we...?" "You know who really sucked it up during Order upon Order?" "We kicked some major tail during Order on Order." "My favorite thing about the Order upon Order War was that..."
  4. Sad to see this. Best of luck wherever you guys go! And don't be strangers!
  5. Geeze Louise, another DoW on NoR?! On this front, I wish both parties great fun!
  6. OK, now, that's gonna hurt. Again, I say, godspeed, NoR! o7
  7. Something tells me NoR won't have much trouble with this one. Nonetheless, godspeed, NoR! o7
  8. These stats are pretty great, but, Ogaden, would you mind putting a column for damage ratios on the "alliance" tab?
  9. Oh, wow, didn't know this would be happening... Good luck to my old friends in Ai!
  10. Naysayers be darned (with ugly Christmas sweaters), this is indubitably an honorable move by TPF. I don't make a habit of hailing non-allied alliances, and I don't have much sympathy for their chosen side, BUT... o/ TPF It's just nice to see an alliance do the right thing, especially if it's going to hurt more than the alternative.
  11. Well, this complicates things. I do wish LoSS godspeed, though I don't condone the actions that have led them here. Honestly, I'm not too surprised to see this coming from VE, but I'd have hoped to not see LoSS doing something like this. There are few things in this realm that cannot be taken from you -- integrity is among them. I hate to see it wasted. I'll echo others in saying that I hope this treaty was indeed in the works prewar, not that it makes a significant difference. Anyway, I'll take the opportunity to remind everyone that LoSS is an ally of DT. I'm feeling a bit like I imagine NG was feeling during the opening stages of the Eq War...
  12. Best of luck to both parties! Love me some NoR -- and currywurst!
  13. This DoW starts with "might doesn't make right" but then proceeds to reinforce that might does in fact make right. Interesting...
  14. Ouch. That's gonna hurt. Anyway, have fun, guys!
  15. Hope all involved have their share of fun! I have some good friends in both NG and TOP, and I wish both sides luck and enjoyment in the battle!
  16. Bipolar II doesn't really work unless someone switches sides midwar. Options iLike: Disorder War Order Upon Order War of the Orders Sith Happens in War To add sth original: Mail Order War
  17. Thanks for the due diligence and setting the record straight. I actually didn't remember seeing any sort of protection for CIN, but was just facetiously throwing out a CB option for the war now already currently underway. It was a two-pronged joke about unfounded CBs and the poorly-kept secret of the then-impending war.
  18. Winter is early. I do like a good wartime sanction race. I'm particularly excited to see how this one plays out... DT for sanction? Heh. Also, geeze Louise, how did TIO and UPN lose 27 and 18 members respectively in one month? Splinter AAs or inactives? BTW, Gopher, I'm a bit confused about what all of those individual AA war stats mean. Is there some sort of key/legend? Don't laugh. :huh: :blink: 3 (0 + 3) 9,673 (718 + 8,954) ▶ WillyPete of Heroic ???
  19. Congrats on this optional treaty between two old friends! Given its name, Chairman Meow is sure to bring much idiocy and famine-induced death and suffering.
  20. Well, this was short and sweet. Given my appreciation for conciseness, +2 for style. Hope both Fark and NSO have some fun!
  21. This is a nicely constructed DoW by NpO. I mean, quoting the attacked as plotting against you AND saying CBs are irrelevant -- that's some pretty incriminating stuff right there. People will disagree or whatever, but as with Ai's attack on Umb, it seems justifiable to me. Of course many a person will post suggesting the true reason for war is this or that, but, as an uninvolved party, I'm inclined to view the reason given as sufficient even if it's not the entire motive behind this war, as is likely the case. I mean, could this war have been averted? Sure, but who wants that? Lulz. Anyway, hopefully everyone can have fun and keep the butthurt to a minimum!
  22. This. So much this. Also, I'm sure it's been said already (yeah, that's right, didn't read every post), but isn't NpO or possibly TOP protecting CIN and this original poster specifically? I think I saw notification of protectorate status several weeks back...
×
×
  • Create New...