IYIyTh
-
Posts
4,457 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Blog Comments posted by IYIyTh
-
-
Honestly, there are two spheres, Polar, and AZTEC-Umb-DBDC, these two spheres overlap with only one alliance, and that is TOP, otherwise, these two spheres would be pretty much more or less separate. Honestly, this 'Polardoxia' no longer exists because of certain moves that the 'doxia' part of that sphere has been making.
lol, ho'boy.
-
or you could not care to bother with petty pretenses and feigned honor and just want to burn everyone down to the ground.
it's much more fun this way, come to think of it.
-
A few of us, myself included tried an idea similar to this back in 07 and it didn't get off the ground. Primary concern was that some alliances might have more influence than others and would use the Federation to achieve their own goals.
You mean like...a federation.
-
Well isn't this touching.
-
you are the least bad owf posting offender. join mi6
-
lol existential !@#$
-
I once went to a mall in NY called the palisades. four floors tall, bolwing alley, ice rink, paint ball thing, etcetc. Huge.
We were there so long, that we forget which entrance we came in and took us 3 hours to get to her car.
such a pain.
-
a+ would read again great blog
-
next time ask if they like him ironically
-
lol caliph
-
real answer is this was actually ahead of its time as a sim...in 2006
-
imo, pull the plug and restart.
had a good run
-
I could have dropped XX and Fark for Umbrella.
-
It is better to wield the sword than fall victim to it.
Worst of all to be completely irrelevant irrespective.
-
You shouldn't have.
-
DO NOT QUESTION MY WRITINGS
-
My determinations are final Auctor.
-
There's an implicit contract when you sign a treaty/agreement with someone that they won't actively look for a way to lead/be a key component of an event that undermines you, their treaty partner.
Those that don't understand that probably shouldn't sign treaties.
Those that do understand that, especially in a position of power -- often ignore it anyway.
-
Social Nations, A Skype Game.
-
Okay?
-
lmao . post financial collapse college graduates for life
-
awww, angsty teenage years!
-
Actually nevermind guys i do not
-
The exception is the official CN channel, but otherwise, your behavior on other alliance channels is not regulated by CN. Now, it very well can be regulated by the channel owners, or even the server IRCops if it violates their ToS. But !@#$ you say outside of CN-owned channels (and which isn't direct harassment of CN staff) is not controlled by CN and you do not face retribution in CN for it (besides player-controlled, in-game retribution).
I don't know how many times I can tell you, you're wrong before you simply accept it.
You will be banned if someone wishes to use it against you.
Alliance Identity
in The Wisdom of Solomon
A blog by HM Solomon I in General
Posted
Alliances are always responsible for the sins of the past, until it's no longer feasible or worth it to punish them for it.