Jump to content

Smooth

Members
  • Posts

    995
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Blog Comments posted by Smooth

  1. Yeah, that's exactly what I was going to say. I can just hear Umbrella now, "Don't make me come down there!"

    Smooth, as was pretty roundly said in the first few pages of MK and Umbrella's thread, it's one thing for them not to declare war on alliances they're attacking, it's another thing to then turn around and grandstand over another alliance do the same thing to them.

    You ask do we really need a 70-page thread to argue it, but here you are opening theargument up in a blog. I mean if you want to get that special feeling just hop in the shower or lock your bedroom door for a few minutes and get it over with.

    This is actually pretty delicious. MK & Umbrella dont' declare war then grandstand over ML not declaring war; Smooth gets pissy about a debate on an issue so he opens a second debate on the issue. I guess you folks just like to have and eat your cake.

    Wasn't pissy at all man. Like I said, it is a pretty cut and dry issue. I didn't open this up for a debate, I was merely commenting on the fact that the argument was taking place elsewhere. In fact, before your post, their was no argument in this thread. Thanks for giving me the credit for what your brought here, though. Fed my overly-large ego. :smug:

  2. :) Good read, Bob. Thank you for the kind words.

    I actually had written into our declaration of war something about how the Entente was the first of their allies to be slaughtered during their reign of tyranny. The first alliance to die because of them, faced with an unjust and eternal war. We took it out to cut length, however.

  3. I like the idea, however I think allowing an attacker to see when you are online is just another advantage to the person who declares the war / is attacking. I think it would be a smart idea to have this new feature turned off when a nation is in war to keep some sort of unknown in the system or whatever. I honestly find it more fun to be attacking and then "AWW, DAMN, HE'S ONLINE!!!"

    EDIT: Didn't see admin's response to this, however I think what I said is still valid.

    In regards to what Gopher said, I like the percent rank idea, as well as making the lower bound a smaller range than the upper bound. Maybe a 3% below 5% above kind of a thing.

×
×
  • Create New...