Un4Gvn1 Posted September 11, 2010 Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 (edited) [center][img]http://img839.imageshack.us/img839/92/200pxupnsvg.png[/img] [/center] [quote][center]Twentieth Cabinet of the United Purple Nations[/center] Title: Casper Resolution Sponsor: DonVox August 31, 2010. 1) A 'casper' is a nation wearing the United Purple Nations alliance affiliation without having applied for membership, as tracked on the Internal Affairs Master List 2) The 'casper' designation should be abolished, effective October 1st. All nations that fall under the current designation of 'casper' shall be a 'ghost'. A 'ghost' is a nation illegally residing in the United Purple Nations alliance affiliation. 3) All current caspers 10000 NS or above, or over 365 days seniority in the United Purple Nations shall be given automatic membership on application 4) All those under 10000 NS and not have 365 days seniority shall be required to pass the Academy upon application 5) After October 1st, all current caspers who have failed to apply to become a member will be re-designated as ghosts and are liable to attack 6) Future nations residing on our Alliance Affiliation shall have one week to apply to become a member, or else be designated as ghosts liable to attack Signed, Prime Minister, Peggy_Sue Tribune, DonVox Tribune, Ahough [/quote] The purpose of making this announcement public is to notify all unaligned nations that UPN no longer accepts Caspers as part of their culture. Negative commentary regarding any past action or in-actions involving the United Purple Nations are not welcome in this topic. Regards, Peggy_Sue Edited September 12, 2010 by Harry Dresden Mod Edit: There are no author's rights in this forum so you don't have to follow the "positive replies only" declaration. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoFish Posted September 11, 2010 Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 Wait, you mean you seriously used to encourage people to ghost your AA? Seriously? I always though that was just an amusing piece of slander... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timtacious Posted September 11, 2010 Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 Why would you attack them if they're *friendly* ghosts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Believland Posted September 11, 2010 Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 Does a facepalm even cover it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alterego Posted September 11, 2010 Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 What other policies will you change to appease the mob? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
commander thrawn Posted September 11, 2010 Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 So you are hoping that ghosts of over a year will decide to apply? If not what you will attack half your AA? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacapo Saladin Posted September 11, 2010 Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 What about that policy of shielding the war deserters of allies from attack, is that one going to get repealed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brutilius Posted September 11, 2010 Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 Caspers have got to be one of the single worst ideas in CN history. At least your coming to some sort of sense now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wickedj Posted September 11, 2010 Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 [quote name='Brutilius' timestamp='1284231787' post='2450025'] Caspers have got to be one of the single worst ideas in CN history. At least your coming to some sort of sense now. [/quote] Paging MHA and ODN to this topic But on topic..why would you WANT ghosts? and think of the precious stats youll lose when you attack them..speaking of..you got any in my range? i need more land Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joseph Black Posted September 11, 2010 Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 Thank you for the notification on this, if you need any assistance with a Ghost hunt, I offer The Organizations full support. What a better way to get some newbs trained. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xoindotnler Posted September 11, 2010 Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 Hello I'm here to jump on the "Booohhhhh UPN" bandwagon. Not really, I do find it hilarious when others do it it's the best thing every done but when UPN does it... Shame on you people, shame on you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
citizenkane Posted September 11, 2010 Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 Too much focus on stats. If a nation cant be bothered to sign up on a forum they dont deserve to be in your alliance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drai Posted September 11, 2010 Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 Free Caspers '0-10! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mathias Posted September 11, 2010 Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 Why would you make it public knowledge that you encouraged ghosting of your AA? Do you [i]want[/i] everyone to think/know how terrible UPN is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirBombAlot Posted September 11, 2010 Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 [quote name='Peggy_Sue' timestamp='1284229361' post='2449995'] Negative commentary regarding any past action or in-actions involving the United Purple Nations are not welcome in this topic. [/quote] Man.... talk about a buzz killer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
relyt92 Posted September 11, 2010 Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 So basically you're doing what every alliance has pretty much always done? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wickedj Posted September 11, 2010 Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 [quote name='Mathias' timestamp='1284232990' post='2450041'] Why would you make it public knowledge that you encouraged ghosting of your AA? Do you [i]want[/i] everyone to think/know how terrible UPN is? [/quote] My dear Mathias, are you new around here? It is a terrible policy that wouldnt exactly be difficult to put an end to Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebel Virginia Posted September 11, 2010 Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 [color="#0000FF"]Geewilligers! Did none of you see that UPN politely requested positive replies only? Geez. Show some class and get off UPN's back. I mean, they asked for you to be positive. Sheesh![/color] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Un4Gvn1 Posted September 11, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 I bid you all, friend and foe, good bye in this venue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delta1212 Posted September 11, 2010 Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 That actually doesn't seem like a terrible idea as long as you keep track of who is an actual member and make sure you and your allies know your real stats. It makes for some extra shielding during wartime. I personally think it'd be too much of a hassle to keep track of, but if you already had it set up... *shrugs* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebel Virginia Posted September 11, 2010 Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 [quote name='Peggy_Sue' timestamp='1284233571' post='2450058'] I bid you all, friend and foe, good bye in this venue. [/quote] [color="#0000FF"]Are you telling us that you will not be responding to any criticism of the UPN? If so, smart move. As many others can attest to, allowing your detractors to walk all over you in public is by all means one of the greatest PR strategies that any alliance can follow. Also, so, how many years did it take you to decide to not allow ghosts on your AA?[/color] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panic King Posted September 11, 2010 Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 [quote name='Believland' timestamp='1284230284' post='2450007'] Does a facepalm even cover it? [/quote] This echo's my setiment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wickedj Posted September 11, 2010 Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 [quote name='Delta1212' timestamp='1284233741' post='2450062'] That actually doesn't seem like a terrible idea as long as you keep track of who is an actual member and make sure you and your allies know your real stats. It makes for some extra shielding during wartime. I personally think it'd be too much of a hassle to keep track of, but if you already had it set up... *shrugs* [/quote] My arguement against such a policy would be how terrible it makes you look in war. if you start the war at 450 members and end it with 380 and only a few were actual surrenders then we have a repeat of all the lolUPN or lolSparta jokes (how many does MHA lose when they go to war?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goose Posted September 11, 2010 Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 I wonder if Casper will defeat UPN. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taget Posted September 11, 2010 Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 (edited) Would a nation who helps a "Casper" be designated a "Wendy"? Edited September 11, 2010 by Taget Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts