Ch33kY Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 Is there any chance MK, and then C&G, will declare war on the alliances hitting the NpO? By the logic of this war it wouldn't surprise me. Hell, if we play our cards right, we might even end up on the same side as C&G. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barnaby von Farter Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 What side are you on now? It has been reported that there are several. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Diorno Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 The alliances that are at war with the NpO are doing so in defence of GOD who is Athens treaty partner. So no. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 Obvious trap is obvious... (Don't expect MK to care about NpO) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave93 Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 The NpO-MK treaty would be non-chaining so CnG would not end up on the other side Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ch33kY Posted February 6, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 (edited) [quote name='Dave93' date='07 February 2010 - 12:40 AM' timestamp='1265467221' post='2164440'] The NpO-MK treaty would be non-chaining so CnG would not end up on the other side [/quote] Got me there. But in this war anything is possible. [quote name='Jack Diorno' date='07 February 2010 - 12:38 AM' timestamp='1265467109' post='2164437'] The alliances that are at war with the NpO are doing so in defence of GOD who is Athens treaty partner. So no. [/quote] What kind of treaty partner are you if you're not warning NpO for attacking your allies? GOD should expect better. [center][img]http://209.85.48.9/10438/178/emo/psyduck.gif[/img][/center] Edited February 6, 2010 by Ch33kY Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevin32891 Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 They won't attack them, because they care about NpO.. wait what? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alterego Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 Of course they wont. MK have manipulated polar into this position and will watch them burn before lifting a finger to help. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadScotII Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 (edited) Don't be silly. The NpO are only MK's ally when MK need something. Everyone knows that MK will not be backing the NpO in their time of need. There is no need to, MK already have what they wanted from the NpO. Why continue to please when the mission is complete? I have to say though, my hat goes up to MK, well played. Edited February 6, 2010 by MadScotsman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barnaby von Farter Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 [quote name='MadScotsman' date='06 February 2010 - 09:55 AM' timestamp='1265468115' post='2164472'] Don't be silly. The NpO are only MK's ally when MK need something. Everyone knows that MK will not be backing the NpO in their time of need. There is no need to, MK already have what they wanted from the NpO. Why continue to please when the mission is complete? I have to say though, my hat goes up to MK, well played. [/quote] Wow, that sounded lusty. What is under your hat? This mission is far from complete, and like you, countless others will be summarily pleased in the foreseeable future. And MK certainly is not a fair-weather ally, I say, as one member within the 'everyone' category that you just mentioned. If you paint your future statements with a brush that wasn't as broad, they might be taken more seriously. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thaone Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 [quote name='MadScotsman' date='06 February 2010 - 03:55 PM' timestamp='1265468115' post='2164472'] Don't be silly. The NpO are only MK's ally when MK need something. Everyone knows that MK will not be backing the NpO in their time of need. There is no need to, MK already have what they wanted from the NpO. Why continue to please when the mission is complete? I have to say though, my hat goes up to MK, well played. [/quote] Hmmm, maybe MK already showed they will back NpO against the odds. I do think you can blame something on MK in the situation which has arisen the past weeks. They overextended their treaty-network, but they without guilt can throw the first stone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebel Virginia Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 [quote name='thaone' date='06 February 2010 - 10:30 AM' timestamp='1265470209' post='2164538'] Hmmm, maybe MK already showed they will back NpO against the odds. [/quote] [color="#0000FF"]Contrary to popular historical revisionist belief, MK was backing GR in the WotC, and not the NpO.[/color] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandwich Controversy Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 If they requested it, probably. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadScotII Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 (edited) [quote name='Barnaby von Farter' date='06 February 2010 - 03:23 PM' timestamp='1265469805' post='2164526'] Wow, that sounded lusty. What is under your hat? This mission is far from complete, and like you, countless others will be summarily pleased in the foreseeable future. And MK certainly is not a fair-weather ally, I say, as one member within the 'everyone' category that you just mentioned. If you paint your future statements with a brush that wasn't as broad, they might be taken more seriously. [/quote] Not really. Please, if I missed it show where MK have backed the NpO over \m/ then the other 6 or so alliances that declared on them over the last few weeks - not that I have a problem with it myself [quote name='thaone' date='06 February 2010 - 03:30 PM' timestamp='1265470209' post='2164538'] Hmmm, maybe MK already showed they will back NpO against the odds. I do think you can blame something on MK in the situation which has arisen the past weeks. They overextended their treaty-network, but they without guilt can throw the first stone. [/quote] I'm not blaming MK for anything, am I? I'm actually applauding them! If I am blaming then please point it out for me please. Edited February 6, 2010 by MadScotsman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barnaby von Farter Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 [quote name='MadScotsman' date='06 February 2010 - 11:14 AM' timestamp='1265472852' post='2164597'] Not really. Please, if I missed it show where MK have backed the NpO over \m/ then the other 6 or so alliances that declared on them over the last few weeks - not that I have a problem with it myself [/quote] Polaris initiated that war. If \m/ and 6 other alliances would have hit Polaris to initiate hostilities, I'm confident it would have prompted a forceful and rapid response from MK. As it stands, this is an apples/oranges (no pun) argument. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thaone Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 [quote name='Rebel Virginia' date='06 February 2010 - 05:01 PM' timestamp='1265472071' post='2164574'] [color="#0000FF"]Contrary to popular historical revisionist belief, MK was backing GR in the WotC, and not the NpO.[/color] [/quote] As someone on the other side back then, I don't give an $@!, evil friends>infra scum = Evil friends>infra scum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Boris Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 As serious as I know MK takes their treaties, I suspect they won't back NpO in this one, though I could be wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steodonn Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 (edited) nvm Edited February 6, 2010 by steodonn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Venizelos Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 considering that MK has lost about 2 MILLION NS, caused by an attack NpO not only knew about but also approved, i'd say the odds of us trying to find nations not in nuclear anarchy to help them with their war is extremely unlikely. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weirdgus Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 [quote name='Venizelos' date='06 February 2010 - 08:02 PM' timestamp='1265479321' post='2164781'] considering that MK has lost about 2 MILLION NS, caused by an attack NpO not only knew about but also approved, i'd say the odds of us trying to find nations not in nuclear anarchy to help them with their war is extremely unlikely. [/quote] So you do hold it against Grub that he approved the TOP/IRON attack on CnG and moreover straight out lied to TOP in making sure such and event would take place? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Venizelos Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 [quote name='Rebel Virginia' date='06 February 2010 - 06:01 PM' timestamp='1265472071' post='2164574'] [color="#0000FF"]Contrary to popular historical revisionist belief, MK was backing GR in the WotC, and not the NpO.[/color] [/quote] do you really think people are retarded enough to believe this? stickmen entered this war against invicta, but they are here to back up MK, even if they arent at war with anyone we are. they are on our side and will face the same outcome with us. [quote name='MadScotsman' date='06 February 2010 - 06:14 PM' timestamp='1265472852' post='2164597'] Not really. Please, if I missed it show where MK have backed the NpO over \m/ then the other 6 or so alliances that declared on them over the last few weeks - not that I have a problem with it myself[/quote] attacking someone aggresively with a horrible, horrible CB and without even asking your allies is hardly comperable to being randomly attacked by TOP without even being part of the war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Venizelos Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 [quote name='Weirdgus' date='06 February 2010 - 08:08 PM' timestamp='1265479701' post='2164789'] So you do hold it against Grub that he approved the TOP/IRON attack on CnG and moreover straight out lied to TOP in making sure such and event would take place? [/quote] i dont understand the second part of what you wrote Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurion Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 (edited) Wouldn't the non-chaining clause apply? (I'm about 90% sure their treaty has one) Not that it really matters, that happening would actually be one of the least strange things to happen during this war. Edited February 6, 2010 by Aurion Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SupremePrince Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 [quote name='Aurion' date='06 February 2010 - 06:21 PM' timestamp='1265480468' post='2164812'] Wouldn't the non-chaining clause apply? (I'm about 90% sure their treaty has one) Not that it really matters, that happening would actually be one of the least strange things to happen during this war. [/quote] I believe, and any polar can correct me if i'm wrong, all our treaties have non-chaining clause. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archon Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 I'm sure that the OP is truly concerned as to the well being of the New Polar Order and couldn't possibly just be floundering around for PR points, could they? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.