Zangmonkey Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 No hails from me, no cheers, no salutes. It is a sad day in the cyberverse when I must march to war against our former friends in IRON. While I understand IRON's treaty obligations in this conflict I hope IRON will understand ours. I look forward to meeting you all on the battlefield and picking up the pieces together when the dust settles. To arms Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCRABT Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Best of luck Gramlins lets dance Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supra25900 Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 I'm scared for Iron.. Always a pleasure to see you guys o/ GR o/ Gre 0/ Karma Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lackistan Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Wow, this is not something I would have expected of you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haflinger Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Yeah this is pretty much appropriate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrideAssassin Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Best of luck to y'all. Nice knowin' ya. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Buscemi Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Good luck Grämlins! Sad to see IRON attack your allies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dilber Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Good luck Grämlins! Sad to see IRON attack your allies. They didn't. They attacked an ally of an ally, who was already in the war, and Gramlins used an aggressive clause. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Flinders Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Honor? Gramlins don't need not steenking honor. Lets cancel a treaty so we can attack someone.Now where have I seen that play before? PR > Honor Please, for the sake of my failing nervous system. TPF members need to stop critiquing how people deal with their treaty arrangements. You canceled a treaty to avoid war then joined anyway because you realized there is no running from this war. You want to talk of honor? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lackistan Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Good luck Grämlins! Sad to see IRON attack your allies. I was unaware that RoK and Gremlins were allied. I was also under the impression that Gremlins enforced non-chaining clauses in all treaties. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earogema Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 I was unaware that RoK and Gremlins were allied.I was also under the impression that Gremlins enforced non-chaining clauses in all treaties. Fark and Gramlins are. Optional AGGRESSION. Fark was not involved until now. There was no chain. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Taco Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Give 'em hell Gre. Sorry it came to this IRON. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dilber Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Fark and Gramlins are.Optional AGGRESSION. Fark was not involved until now. There was no chain. There's still a codex clause for joint aggressive actions. I'm assuming they aren't following it, unless they've already decided peace terms. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lackistan Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Fark and Gramlins are.Optional AGGRESSION. Fark was not involved until now. There was no chain. Glad to see Gremlins has fallen into the good old CN habit of e-lawyering treaties for convienence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Feanor Noldorin Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 This is sad to see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earogema Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 There's still a codex clause for joint aggressive actions. I'm assuming they aren't following it, unless they've already decided peace terms. That I do not know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Glad to see Gremlins has fallen into the good old CN habit of e-lawyering treaties for convienence. How is that e-lawyering if its how a treaty works? Plus, you quoted MegaAros, from Vox, not a Gremlins member. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steelrat Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 I love it when all starting the e-lawyering.....well not all, seems like IRON doesn´t. Respect! We will see us on the battlefield. Personal message to all IRON members, if any Grämlins member lack class and respect, report it to any Grämlins .gov at #gremlins@coldfront.net. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lackistan Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 How is that e-lawyering if its how a treaty works? Plus, you quoted MegaAros, from Vox, not a Gremlins member. I know. But unless a member of the Conclave can explain an ulterior justification, I will have to assume this is it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steelrat Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 There's still a codex clause for joint aggressive actions. I'm assuming they aren't following it, unless they've already decided peace terms. Nice jab, especially as you I'm assuming ...... Dilber you can do better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ejayrazz Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Any Gremlin member insult IRON, I will personally bite them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTTofAK Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 (edited) o/ Gramlins 15 war update blitz. Edited April 24, 2009 by GTTofAK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lokie Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 There's still a codex clause for joint aggressive actions. I'm assuming they aren't following it, unless they've already decided peace terms. Not be an e-lawyer but Peace terms have to be DISCUSSED...not decided upon.. Here is the exact language: VI. On Joint Offensive OperationsThe Grämlins shall only participate in joint operations if the full evidence and proof for the CB has been shared, the exact goal of the war has been defined, rough peace term demands have been discussed and the other participants have been named. Carry On Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azaghul Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Give'em hell! o/ Grämlins Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragashingo Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 They didn't. They attacked an ally of an ally, who was already in the war, and Gramlins used an aggressive clause. Oh the shame, the shame. But then again why do you care, you're probably going to quit after this anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.