Jump to content

UCR Declaration of War


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 433
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

12 hours ago, shwampy said:

also, for an alliance who I thought were in to the warz for the lolz, you sure come across as a bunch of spreadsheet nerds obsessing about useless stats...

Which stats do you consider useless, and which (if any) useful?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, jerdge said:

Which stats do you consider useless, and which (if any) useful?

Like CrinkledStraw you seem to have missed my point. If you'd like me to explain it let me know 😘

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, shwampy said:

Like CrinkledStraw you seem to have missed my point. If you'd like me to explain it let me know 😘

No, I couldn't misinterpret your point because I didn't interpret it in any way, in fact I didn't at all comment about our replied to your point.

Much more simply: you had written of "useless stats", I asked to you "which stats [do] you consider useless and which (if any) [you consider] useful?" There's no way to ask my question in a simpler way and there's no way you could have missed its meaning.

 

So now, yes, please explain: which stats do you consider useless and which (if any) do you consider useful? Thanks in advance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, jerdge said:

No, I couldn't misinterpret your point because I didn't interpret it in any way, in fact I didn't at all comment about our replied to your point.

Much more simply: you had written of "useless stats", I asked to you "which stats [do] you consider useless and which (if any) [you consider] useful?" There's no way to ask my question in a simpler way and there's no way you could have missed its meaning.

 

So now, yes, please explain: which stats do you consider useless and which (if any) do you consider useful? Thanks in advance.

 

Don't take it personally. The Commies are mad they're losing despite holding a massive size advantage, so they're just lashing out at everybody.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, jerdge said:

No, I couldn't misinterpret your point because I didn't interpret it in any way, in fact I didn't at all comment about our replied to your point.

Much more simply: you had written of "useless stats", I asked to you "which stats [do] you consider useless and which (if any) [you consider] useful?" There's no way to ask my question in a simpler way and there's no way you could have missed its meaning.

 

So now, yes, please explain: which stats do you consider useless and which (if any) do you consider useful? Thanks in advance.

hmm, maybe next time ask ChatGPT to help you with constructing a few English sentences? Nice use of brackets though!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, shwampy said:

hmm, maybe next time ask ChatGPT to help you with constructing a few English sentences? Nice use of brackets though!

 

Another day, another Commie surrender on the OWF, as @Sabcat surrenders to The Wolves.

 

TW is declaring 19 offensive wars and receiving 2 defensive wars.

 

Your dear leader is not sending any financial assistance to the commies we are fighting, who are increasingly running low on cash.

 

@lilweirdward could we get a fresh set of stats at your convenience?

Edited by firingline
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, firingline said:

 

Another day, another Commie surrender on the OWF, as @Sabcat surrenders to The Wolves.

 

TW is declaring 19 offensive wars and receiving 2 defensive wars.

 

Your dear leader is not sending any financial assistance to the commies we are fighting, who are increasingly running low on cash.

 

@lilweirdward could we get a fresh set of stats at your convenience?



Yes. This is correct. I have surrendered. I just couldn't take it anymore. All that sitting around looking at the nations I'd fought in this war, like Firingline, languishing so far out of range with no money, no hope and no clue. All I can do is send aid to UCR and LSF nations so at least my soldiers will add to someone's casualty numbers. 

That is of course unless crowncoyboy can find his way out of PM where he's been hiding since May. I can help him directly with his casualties. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, firingline said:

 

Another day, another Commie surrender on the OWF, as @Sabcat surrenders to The Wolves.

 

TW is declaring 19 offensive wars and receiving 2 defensive wars.

 

Your dear leader is not sending any financial assistance to the commies we are fighting, who are increasingly running low on cash.

 

@lilweirdward could we get a fresh set of stats at your convenience?

is there a reason you quoted me?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sabcat said:

Yes. This is correct. I have surrendered.

 

Yep. We know. You tried to get out of it, but at the end of the day, you were forced to tap out.

 

Quote

All that sitting around looking at the nations I'd fought in this war, like Firingline, languishing so far out of range with no money, no hope and no clue.

 

Oh dear. It's delusional.

 

Quote

All I can do is send aid to UCR and LSF nations so at least my soldiers will add to someone's casualty numbers.

 

Not sure if you'll be permitted to do this or not. (Common surrender terms include not sending aid to combatants.) But even if you do, it's only going to help us. We're dictating the flow of the battle and anything you send is just going to enable us to loot more from these schmucks.

 

You're the second surrender in three days, though, so it may eventually get to the point where there are no people left for you to aid. Sad.

 

Quote

That is of course unless crowncoyboy can find his way out of PM where he's been hiding since May. I can help him directly with his casualties. 

 

Someone doesn't understand what 'surrendered' means.

 

I assure you part of you being permitted to rejoin PGS was that you can't rejoin this conflict. I'm sure your betters will be in contact with you over the coming days to reiterate that to you and explain to you the long-term consequences of surrendering and then re-entering the conflict.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, firingline said:

 

Yep. We know. You tried to get out of it, but at the end of the day, you were forced to tap out.

 

 

Oh dear. It's delusional.

 

 

Not sure if you'll be permitted to do this or not. (Common surrender terms include not sending aid to combatants.) But even if you do, it's only going to help us. We're dictating the flow of the battle and anything you send is just going to enable us to loot more from these schmucks.

 

You're the second surrender in three days, though, so it may eventually get to the point where there are no people left for you to aid. Sad.

 

 

Someone doesn't understand what 'surrendered' means.

 

I assure you part of you being permitted to rejoin PGS was that you can't rejoin this conflict. I'm sure your betters will be in contact with you over the coming days to reiterate that to you and explain to you the long-term consequences of surrendering and then re-entering the conflict.

 

 

You have clearly never had any interactions at all with @Master Hakai 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Master Hakai said:

Sometimes I forget that everything firing lane says is hilarious

 

I couldn't be as funny as Sabcat if I tried. "I'm surrendering, but I reserve all rights to fight again if I want" 🤡

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, shwampy said:

hmm, maybe next time ask ChatGPT to help you with constructing a few English sentences? Nice use of brackets though!

Trying to be a dick with bystanders politely asking you questions seems fairly unintelligent.

The sad thing is that I tend to forget stuff pretty quickly, and the pointlessness of your behaviour is rather unremarkable... in some time from now I might again waste my time asking to you about something else.

Oh well.

 

Edited by jerdge
spelling
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, jerdge said:

Trying to be a dick with bystanders politely asking you questions seems fairly unintelligent.

The sad thing is that I tend to forget stuff pretty quickly, and the pointlessness of your behaviour is rather unremarkable... in some time from now I might again waste my time asking to you about something else.

Oh well.

 

It was kind of you to try.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/27/2023 at 9:10 PM, Rebel Virginia said:

The League recognizes LSF an alliance, and we will treat any further denial of their status as an alliance by you as a hostile action from the Viridian Entente. Consider this your only warning.

 i only just spotted this ❤️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stats update #4!

 

Alliance Name Active Nations Nation Strength Damage Dealt Damage Received Offensive Wars Defensive Wars Nukes Per Active Nation
Libertarian Socialist Federation 4 (+1) 82,334 (-9,343) 141,393.51 (+19,980.06) 112,040.02 (+22,201.01) 20 14 (+4) 5.5 (+0.5)
Union Of Communist Republics 13 788,688 (-121,019) 647,220.87 (+94,063.27) 610,030.11 (+123,458.72) 63 (+6) 74 (+20) 19.3077 (-4.4615)
Socialist Workers Front 2 123,693 (+931) 54,819.49 71,293.32 (+1,235.52) 1 12 12.5
The Wolves 12 307,783 (+38,024) 793,363.45 (+146,895.25) 843,433.87 (+114,043.33) 100 (+24) 84 (+6) 10.6667 (+0.4167)

 

One quick thing to point out: I made sure to include the James v. Sabcat war under LSF's stats. I didn't include any other stats that accrued from the PGS dust-up, though, since neither side ran more than a day's attacks on the other before calling it off.

 

Edited by lilweirdward
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, lilweirdward said:

Stats update #4!

 

Alliance Name Active Nations Nation Strength Damage Dealt Damage Received Offensive Wars Defensive Wars Nukes Per Active Nation
Libertarian Socialist Federation 4 (+1) 82,334 (-9,343) 141,393.51 (+19,980.06) 112,040.02 (+22,201.01) 20 14 (+4) 5.5 (+0.5)
Union Of Communist Republics 13 788,688 (-121,019) 647,220.87 (+94,063.27) 610,030.11 (+123,458.72) 63 (+6) 74 (+20) 19.3077 (-4.4615)
Socialist Workers Front 2 123,693 (+931) 54,819.49 71,293.32 (+1,235.52) 1 12 12.5
The Wolves 12 307,783 (+38,024) 793,363.45 (+146,895.25) 843,433.87 (+114,043.33) 100 (+24) 84 (+6) 10.6667 (+0.4167)

 

One quick thing to point out: I made sure to include the James v. Sabcat war under LSF's stats. I didn't include any other stats that accrued from the PGS dust-up, though, since neither side ran more than a day's attacks on the other before calling it off.

 

Got control of the aggressive wars, now just need to catch up a little in damage.... 

 

Al

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...