Sandwich Controversy

[quote name='Judge X' timestamp='1313213297' post='2779207'] United Equestria is under TPF's protection. [/quote] You have some !@#$@#$ balls to do this.

...thanks for this.

[quote name='Omniscient1' timestamp='1313204752' post='2779072'] I never really liked you, but 4 years is quite the accomplishment. Congrats! [/quote] Yes, I echo these sentiments. Congratulations on your disbandment, 64digits.

I look forward to reading eulogies from the other now-former members of 64digits. RIP.

The literal king of run-on sentences

[quote name='Mogar' timestamp='1313173805' post='2778702'] I wouldn't connect the current TPF gov with anything they did while in Q, there isn't a single person on that list of gov members still in the alliance, when you're in that comfortable of a political position, you tend to be able to act arrogant, I dont think any bloc will ever compare to the hegemony we had over the world during that time. I mean, for admin's sake, we attacked GPA [i]because we were bored and wanted tech/land,[/i] something like that couldn't ever happen again. edit: and for the record, I'm not going to even attempt to defend my actions with TPF's MoFA, I supported what my leader wanted, it wasn't about "is this morally right?" it was about "what does slayer want to happen?", and I doubt I was the first nor will I be the last to follow my leaders into hell, though I do enjoy acknowledging I predicted Karma, hence my departure from TPF gov, but nobody wanted to do anything about it because people were stupid and thought treaties actually mattered, and couldn't be canceled. [/quote] [i]I was just following orders[/i]

[quote name='Vol Navy' timestamp='1313126211' post='2778410'] I admire your optimism about it at least. But PB/DH has already shown they will roll an alliance they think is growing too large even if you aren't making any kind of aggressive political moves. Right now the only upper tier that can take on an Umbrella/MK combination resides in the SF/XX sphere. Who, after two years of being closely allied to, and rolling others with MK/PB is suddenly immoral and not to be trusted?? Why SF and Fark of course, the very upper tier that could threaten them. If your nations grow to a potentially threatening size, look out. You will find yourself on the short end of the MK/PB stick. [/quote] Well then luckily for you TPF is in no such danger.

Xiphosis when will you be cancelling the [s]GOONS MDP[/s] ??? in response to this

[quote name='Rebel Virginia' timestamp='1313025615' post='2777096'] [color="#0000FF"]You seem quite upset about this. If I didn't know better I'd suspect that NATO has plans to support SF. I can't say I'll be sorry to see your alliance burn. I can only pray that NSO has a part in it.[/color] [/quote] Who would pray to fight NATO except a member of a really bad alliance? You should at least be shooting for RnR.

This thread is full of posts that come off as whiny. I suggest you stop that, it's not convincing anyone to fight with you when the time comes.

Is RIA really like that in private, especially on their own forums? Do the rest of you literally find that funny?

[quote name='Transtar' timestamp='1312261244' post='2769837'] [i]tl;dr Bacon: Hobo Beer: Paranoia Boobies: Kahiel[/i] [/quote] Amazing, amazing. This announcement is pure, distilled Fark.

I have noticed that although there is a Non Grata option for the sanctioned alliance pip, the image does not actually exist on the server. I have confirmed this problem with numerous people. Screenshot: [img]http://i.imgur.com/uH3FF.png[/img]

Please rank the following blocs/treaties: PF XX DR PB DH SF CnG AZTEC Thanks in advance!

~one month later~

[quote name='kwell' timestamp='1312007915' post='2767544'] Dam, I feel bad for the fa's departments dealing with this train wreck [/quote] More like shipwreck.

[quote name='shahenshah' timestamp='1311949901' post='2766951'] Year long reps ftw. [/quote] I'm glad you've come around.

[quote name='Haflinger' timestamp='1311882990' post='2766343'] Fark also has a tech advantage: Fark has 22 nations over 10K tech, TOP only has 12. The #1 TOP that was destroyed in Bipolar is ... gone. What TOP has left is still quite impressive, but Fark is a whole bunch bigger. This much is apparent: 34 nations over the 10K tech barrier, yes, damages will be ginormous. TOP is better coordinated, but they're no Molon Labe. And they would have to be to win against those odds. [/quote] Gonna echo flak. Having fought ML thrice, TOP is better. ML was a [i]really[/i] weird choice for this post by the way.

SF and MJ are much weaker than I had imagined.

Ak47don ruined our streak by switching AAs. That doesn't count.

First page, great bloc. Perhaps the greatest bloc. (that we are not in)

That was really embarrassing, but if you've seen Fark's military performances since Karma it's not a surprise.

[quote name='IYIyTh' timestamp='1311790249' post='2765406'] IRON beat Ramlins. [/quote] Don't be ignorant.

Please retaliate, AcTi has some protectorates with nations I want to raid D:

Thanks links to the threads would not have sufficed