Jump to content

Sandwich Controversy

Banned
  • Posts

    2,926
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Sandwich Controversy

  1. [quote name='Gibsonator21' timestamp='1323389573' post='2869817'] You attacked three alliances who were staying neutral in this conflict and got them agree to not enter the war. You didn't accomplish anything other than getting away with a tech raid. [/quote] Indeed, I hope the tech was worth this PR disaster, Doomhome.
  2. Will you be paying any reparations for this mistake, Doomhome?
  3. [quote name='Roadie' timestamp='1323383348' post='2869652'] Haha, VE told MK what was and what wasn't going to happen on the GOD front. That's a strong move, we should all bow. [/quote] They tried to, but ultimately VE was not the reason MK didn't declare on GOD.
  4. Please define unreasonable terms thank-you
  5. [quote name='Kowalski' timestamp='1323323094' post='2868611'] No we don't, and no we didn't. [/quote] Looks like Fungicide 2012 just got expanded a bit.... weather forecasts a windy day... not good for umbrellas...
  6. [quote name='NoFish' timestamp='1323321472' post='2868469'] So are they going to pre-empt WTF next? They haven't announced that they're going to be neutral this war but have shown just as much inclination to join as CRAP and TTK. [/quote] Doomhouse please do this.
  7. Doomhome thinks the world will let them get away with ANOTHER preempt, especially after they just condemned Fark for doing it
  8. [quote name='kriekfreak' timestamp='1323197858' post='2865879'] Is that MJ? [/quote] Voldemort
  9. 5 more declarations and you might reach a whole page!
  10. [quote name='alyster' timestamp='1323148402' post='2865233'] Can I have new ones then? [/quote] You'll find that they've been lowered over time so they can grow more and secure more animated pips
  11. Hahahahahah I'm dying laughing here. At everything.
  12. You've presented some pretty damning evidence here.
  13. [quote name='der_ko' timestamp='1323005406' post='2862207'] I haven't really been paying much attention so my nominations may be way off, but NG, NPO and TOP had pretty good years so far, [/quote] Actually NPO has had a terrible year, being preempted twice.
  14. [quote name='Unknown Smurf' timestamp='1322962419' post='2861211'] (This is based on my memory so details may be off..) Back in the day Fark was 'opposed' to the NPO 'side' (old GOONS was a significant player in this story, but FAN/GGA/\m//IRON/NpO etc. were all NPO supporters). I use the word opposed loosely because they were not openly against them, but they weren't aligned to them (similar to VE 1.0). They were afraid what would happen to them considering what happened to VE 1.0 (and others, see ONOS, GPA, etc) so they ended up treatying NPO. Half of their membership revolted because they didn't want to treaty NPO, and GOONS egged on a few prominent members to leave and create TotalFarkistan, the alliance basically split in half. GOONS also gave a protectorate (or MDP, can't remember) to TF!. Fark eventually declared war on TF! and GOONS rolled them. Under the direction of NPO, GOONS kept Fark at war for a long time and then extracted reps for them and then required Fark to sell their donations to GOONS and NPO nations for 6 months or whatever. A lot of people were enraged they had to pay other realm money for reps. Old GOONS did pay Bob dongs for the donations in quite a few occasions, but I don't believe NPO did. [/quote] Hahahahahaha it's like you didn't study for your history test and just made something up on the spot
  15. [quote name='Matt Miller' timestamp='1322916434' post='2860568'] I hear recognizing humor is not your strong suit. [/quote] He and Fark have something in common then
  16. finally the planet will get a much needed throwback to 2007
  17. Why don't you honour your existing treaties before you go and sign more edit: this goes for both of you.
  18. [quote name='Baron Terror' timestamp='1322751465' post='2858191'] I remember in the WotC Polar and its allies effectively decided that they would just go down in flames and try and do as much damage as possible, as quickly as possible, before they were all out of pixels. That may have not been the case but it looked like that from an outside pov. Now I know RIA are not cowards, and I highly doubt they would have even signed with NpO without knowing they would have to defend them, however I find that its funny how much has changed in the culture of the game since 2008, since now every war seems to be a limited one, with some alliance playing the martyr so there allies can live another day. It seems a lot alliance have pretty much given up playing, and justify this by asking why should they bother indulging the collective bloodlust on our part when they know they have no hope of winning. Its like when you play monopoly and give up half way through because the other guy has hotels on all the greens and dark blues. The problem with that is that nothing will happen until the deed is done, as every global war usually creates the grudges that lead onto the next one (not in every case but you know what I mean). So no one is going to get off your back unless they all get the massive global war that we have all been waiting for. [/quote] You remember wrong, Polar's strategy was to just let themselves get rolled without fighting back and hope for the best.
  19. Tehre's only one way to describe this announcement: epic......
  20. [quote name='Banksy' timestamp='1322715874' post='2857659'] Oh hey GOD could help out too with their non-CN parent community. [/quote] CN could use some talented writers.
  21. [quote name='James Dahl' timestamp='1322592423' post='2855956'] TOP only has 49 declared wars total for this entire conflict, and a third of those are actually Polar declaring on TOP. [/quote] "IRON doesn't exist" -you Polar is losing really badly right now, it's an undeniable fact.
×
×
  • Create New...