Lord Curzon

I see your strategy of tying up good blocs like BFF with !@#$ blocs like Sentinel is working. Well played Superfriends, well played.

Haha, this is such domination. [img]http://i.mobavatar.com/gossips/i-love-it-when-a-plan-comes-together.jpg[/img]

alright, so yeah. Welcome and such

God Damn It! how did we draw the short straw?! Ah well, free tech is nice. [img]http://torn.sharuntech.com/public/style_emoticons/default/emot-Dawkins102.gif[/img]

[quote name='AlmightyGrub' timestamp='1322631299' post='2856548'] There is some merit in what you say, we did have some issues with the way you rolled over us, there was also TSO, Crymson being a lying $%^& and several other contributing factors. We did focus on some of those issues for a period of time but we were so close to fixing our issues if we are being really honest (I know it seems so difficult to believe I could ever tell the truth about such matters) but several factors changed my mind fairly rapidly, mostly to do with Crymson. These were personal decisions made by me as a result of my interactions with Crymson throughout that whole build-up to war period. I tried to let it go, but at the end of the day, Crymson did not want to be honest. I therefore felt no obligation to be honest with him. It is funny to see me being accused of being arrogant when one of the major issues I have always had with certain people is their level of arrogance in general. I know I am a major prick, but some of you are in a class all of your own. The only thing that saves you is your ability to find friends with similar levels. I don't actually hate TOP as much as I resent Crymson. Just as some of you regard me as Polaris thorugh that era, I felt the same way about Crymson. Crymson was TOP's focal point for such a long time the lines got very blurred for me. Crymson allowed himself to run the agenda of alliances outside the conflict resulting in terms that were offensive to us and to me long term. We coped with the whole tech payment crapola as an exercise in mechanics but losing Random in particular was a stella term for long term issues. You try very hard to get over things like that but seeing your friends forced into other alliances is a very hard thing to take tbh, especially when you are the one that signs off on it. I tried to give myself a chance to clear this one, but I was fed lies and !@#$%^&*... I had the logs from the era, so I knew the truth. Crymson just didn't want to go to the trouble of admitting it. It is a pity really. I don't ever see Polaris and TOP being friends or even tolerating each other, but I would love to see an end to the empty rhetoric spewed forth from both sides over the past 2 years. I am happy to put it to bed whenever you are guys. I won't love you, I won't even like you, but I am prepared to let it go when you are ready to do so. I would strongly suggest to any alliance that thinks approaching a new found friend with a plot to betray an existing ally to really think it all the way through first though. I know I am an arrogant SOB but that was one ballsy move Crymson. Have fun guys, see you after Xmas. [/quote] You do realize Crymson was not even the one who pushed the preempt, correct? Sure he signed off, but I'm quite confident he said something to the effect of (paraphrasing) "you sure we shouldn't wait another night to see if they come in" and we saying something to the effect of "hell no, lets get our fight on." Glad you're so fixated on his personage that you totally ignored the rest of us. Pretend it was just "getting Crymson" if you will, but you know that it was the shot to get TOP and the rest of us screwed. Bottom line: You thought your buddies would reward you for your duplicity on their behalf with a better political position. You thought wrong. Now you pay.

Capital, pip pi chaps

hellz yeah

[quote name='BloodFury' timestamp='1322420074' post='2853873'] Why do I have a feeling this will be the last time STA defends NpO? [/quote] Because we all hope that eventually Battered Women Syndrome wears off.

[quote name='James Dahl' timestamp='1322419462' post='2853870'] Wars rarely resolve grudges, they just make new ones :v [/quote] "So it goes"

[quote name='Robster83' timestamp='1322369833' post='2853376'] Please, get some balls. [/quote] sounds good

[quote name='President S O' timestamp='1322315475' post='2852407'] Don't mind if I do. [/quote] I'll drink to that, and will begin smoking a cigar in anticipation of our our support being more than moral.

This is change I can believe in

Sweet, the dream team showed up to fight

I think there are a great number of Feanor quotes which indicated how this would happen. We're sorry there were not enough Polars to justify a direct hit, but we're proud to stand in line to expel radioactive juices for our brothers. Can't wait to see who signs up!

AWWW YEAH!

Sweet, so... two birds one nuke, I believe is the expression.

[quote name='Feanor Noldorin' timestamp='1322059140' post='2849695'] Just in time to have those stats knocked back down again. Huzzah! [/quote] Sounds like fun!

[quote name='Confusion' timestamp='1321686237' post='2846805'] Please, burn each other to the ground! However, if necessary, I'm willing to intermediate peace between your two alliances, in the name of Allah. [/quote] Delay have mercy on their souls.

cool beans

[quote name='mrwuss' timestamp='1319098169' post='2829180'] Because the point is to win. Everyone involved in this war is awful. Roll Polar. [/quote] I second the motion and call for a general vote on the matter.

[quote name='dvdcchn' timestamp='1319086367' post='2829081'] Ha! I see what you did thar... [/quote] I do try sometimes DVD.

[quote name='Alex987' timestamp='1319065875' post='2828855'] Yes, GOD is coming with us to Duckroll [/quote] Wow, that would make our whole military communication thing really awkward.... it'd be like having STA in your coalition channel.

Good deal.

[quote name='foxfire99' timestamp='1314150471' post='2787349'] True. They should try it on somebody more competent than MJ, like C&G. [/quote] Oh no, PB! Please don't betray C&G!!!

[quote name='SpacingOutMan' timestamp='1313939687' post='2785581'] 1. Probably 2. Wouldn't you like to know. [/quote] Good. I recommend it. I'm a big proponent, obviously. I think it would be good to see it tested a 3rd time, just to break the 1:1 success/defeat ratio. The sad thing though, is that we will need to find some way to control for competence after you guys try it. I'd hate to throw off the experiment with such a massive negative outlier.