Vespassianus

Thank you guys for everything, it was a fun ride.

Surprised to see this considering the relationship between FTW/FEAR and NEW. Also why do you bother with declaration on forums if there are no wars launched in-game?

Any plans for the future?

it's not that big deal, i remember it happens like yearly twice, not to common, so it's 2x3x100=600 extra tech in a year.

I have a few questions about this new initiative. The idea seems good to me, less multies make a better game, but i have a some concerns. 1. You say that the top cheater guy gained 24,5k tech in a year by multies alone. With perfect slot effiency you can get 36x600=21600 tech in a year. If you are right that someone gained 24,5k tech in a year by aid, then you have bigger problems than multies, if not then your calculations are wrong. 2. Do you investigate nations who were banned previously or do you look for all active nations who seems to be on free tech? 3. What about nations, who proved to be multies, but seemed to be tech dealing at usual selling rate in the past? 4. How many nations are involved? You seem to have a few usual suspects (given my tech, i guess it includes me), but today basically every bigger (and a lot of upcoming) nation is receiving a lot free tech. Do you have enough resources to really investigate every suspicious nation or just some nations that seemed to hated by part of the community? 5. How do you figure out aid date for previous years and deleted nations? Do you use external (and might be not so reliable, due to alliance bias) databases like lyricalz? 6. How do you make a difference about alliance tech programs and multi rings? Today most alliance is pumping top nations tech, while multiple nations are allowed in the same network, how can you figure out who's a multi and who's not?

Not 1 mil ns is the big number, by playing long enough anyone can reach it, but the 428 effiency is the real deal, you don't even see anyone else over 300 (like no war and max donation Dulra is at 250) meanwhile Cuba has the most casualties too by fighting many wars, sometimes as an underdog.

An update soon would be nice, the last global war and the WTF skirmish filled a few graveyards.

Go to edit my nation. You will see a lot of stuff. Among a lot of things you can choose "war is an option" or "i do not want to be attacked". Choose the second and you are in the safest place of cn. Peace mode is underrated.

FAN is trying to play the tough guy, business as usual.

Anyone with less than 10 bil is a beggar.

Not sure about GOP being real neutrals, but they are real fighters for sure. Keep up the good work guys!

Congratulations guys!

Yeah clearly something is broken my soldier costs are $22,69, while tanks cost are $2144,86. I'm not sure that it's calculating wrc effect twice or something like that, because it looks a bit random how it's calculated for others, but it's definitely not soldier cost x 40.

Your high tier did nothing when ODN's big guys rolled NpO's high tier and you also didn't help TOP when RnR's 100k guys attacked them. You had the opportunity to fight enemy high tiers in defense of allies, but you didn't, so don't complain.

Or maybe Steve just wanted to hurt some people, then sold stuff to get out of the range of much bigger nations :P Also if people would post screenshots about the stats i would say thanks. And it would be fun to see the change by weeks.

If you want more players in TE just make the game more interesting, not just grudge wars and curbstomps going on for rounds and rounds.

To be fair TOP did good amount of damage, but i guess they prefer to put nations, who aren't used in a battle to peace mode. Maybe more of their nations could have been fighting, but still they completed their objectives and destroyed every high tier they fought. You can't really blame them for using the active, tech heavy, good warchest guys to fight. NPO were fighting hard too, before the war they had like 35-40 guys over 100k ns, now they have 16, mostly hippies/bankers, so most of them high tier fought heavily. You can't say that they didn't put up a fight, especially if you see their damage input and output. If you wanna make some criticism you should aim it to NPO's side strategy to let Umb/TOP take their alliances's high tiers one by one instead of putting up a concentrated effort or you could make fun of ODN's excessive peace mode usage or TLR's shitty performance.

Sad to see an old player, who made this game more interesting leaving. Good luck in RL!

UCN was the real deal, good ally with solid members.

We might make an exception, because tayloj is so lonely at the low tier :D

It's called half-win or underdog attack. If you have 10-20% winning odds as an attacker you have some chance to get these. The damage is the half of the normal GA damage and the attacker lose money.

I hope you know what you are doing and why.

Robster you are good guy, but you were never really good at leading an alliance. Playing the tough guy in a curbstomp while you declare 27 wars so far? I wish that your top guys wouldn't hide in peace mode.

Do you extend your war declarations to Sparta's high tier too? So far you didn't really touch them, but i know for sure that Alex would welcome more wars. Or maybe the former war deserters in TIO aren't ready to fight?

Can we see your biggest guy fighting actually in a war?