Jump to content

Vespassianus

Members
  • Posts

    812
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Vespassianus

  1. Yeah it's long due, but NG looks unprepared and inactive for me (or at least their high tier), some wars ago they were at better form and with VE (and others who will join later) you have decisive advantage, but i guess it will be still a good fight. I don't have as high expectations for NG as i would have sooner, but if they get their shit together and their guys become active they could do some damage.
  2. Thanks for the update. By the way Methax is the No 10.
  3. Some pages ago TPF just raided them innocently, now you are saying another story. Now you say that you are playing moral police? If attacking TDO bothered you so much then TPF should have declared war on MQ formally and be done. Instead you "raided" them and when they fought back you started chasing them. I come from Planet Raider, but if my raid target nuke i fight for a week then let them go. And how can you play moral police if you chasing down raid targets who dared to fight back. (Not mentioning that your charter says that you can raid alliances with 10 or less members http://cybernations.wikia.com/wiki/Fifth_Charter_of_The_Phoenix_Federation , but i guess it's your business, however it has funny parts: "If the nation being raided fights back, TPF will not assist member nations militarily or financially," " If a nation belonging to an alliance of more than 10 members is assaulted, without prior approval of the Evil Overlord, reparations to the effect of 120% or higher shall be allotted to the victim, along with an immediate peace." Attacking MQ has nothing to do with TDO, said by RnR and i can just agree Then why do you try to wage some propaganda war here? Hating an alliance and hitting them isn't a crime, but trying to look like an innocent white knight while you are doing this isn't respectable.
  4. TPF, NATO and others had no business to do with MQ besides taking a cheap shot on them, what they missed last war. You give them a fight before they quit, in exchange you get your revenge. You could have gone away with it. Attacking nations on DBDC AA wasn't a bright idea, i really don't get why you couldn't let them peace out and let them delete/head to another alliance, none of them declared on you before you attacked them. Now before a long waited great war your nice plans will be ruined because your top tier will be gone, i'm not sure it's really worth to attack some nations who were fighting neutrals.
  5. Ah you are still butthurt because your whole alliance folded against a single nation who raided you? Also questioning that DBDC is an alliance or not is pretty pointless, it has 17 members currently, made more damage already than some alliance in their whole existence, and there is a shiny new DoE for the resident e-lawyers.
  6. Okay Rooman try to stop for a second. If you want to downdeclare on an alliance who attacked your mates, disturbed your mood or just because you don't like them and wanna see them nuked to the ground it's okay. Just don't claim moral superiority while you are doing it. If you want to take cheap shots, take them, just don't try to picture yourself as a righteous hero. Before GOP attacked MQ they were already fighting TDO, TTE, CCC and got raids by a lot of other alliances. In terms on nation strength they were outnumbered like 4 vs 1, and even if we don't count the high tier of TDO who were rolled by us the high tier of MQ could be have been rolled by TTE and CCC, if they would have cared to declare war and not to flee into peace mode (by the way hello TTE 241k guy, we will come for you :) ). Then you came with your wrath (or urge to fight a probably easy war and get some generals) and made a nice downdeclare on nations who were already engaged in nuclear wars. Then you hide behind VE's coat fast just to ensure that none will attack you. Sadly it didn't work, because DBDC likes to fight wars and hate hypocrite neutrals. Also you should be rather worried about being bill-locked in the coming days, then to fight on the OWF. It will be sad to see you turtleing.
  7. I heard threats to declare another war souldn't be taken seriously from people who are fighting a war outnumbered and currently enjoying the benefits of nuclear anarchy :D
  8. To be fair WTF has some good fighters, who proved themself in SE and TE too. Also their tech levels are much better and i suspect that they have real warchests, it would be a mistake to underestimate them. TDO with poor preparation, tactics and coordination is standing their ground, i would expect the same from WTF, but only fighting much more effectively. Also Cuba should post his battle supported nuke, until he does i can brag only about mine: (also i don't get why did TDO guys refuse to play without nukes when we have some tech advantage)
  9. Boy, commitment to eternal fighting is nice, but you need some warchests first.
  10. So before your big nations got hurt you peaced out? Well done, have a good flag run :P
  11. Leaving out a nation of your stats because he isn't active is a bit strange, Hellas has inactives too, who just inflate our numbers, but we don't use them to lower our stats. But let's have a good war, the initial attack clearly caught us off the guard, hopefully we can recover from the shock.
  12. Flying Kiwis and a downdeclare? How surprising. Also i guess you need to protect better your flag running big boy...
  13. Nice updeclare and it will be a good show to watch :popcorn:
  14. What could be better than some grudge wars? Only revenge for them :D
  15. I think generals give bonuses only to their own branch.
  16. 1. Admin created the decreasing income after some point of infra (i think max income is at 22k infra with trade swaps, at least i experienced that and some other guys too) to balance the game, to prevent having nations with super high infra. There's already too much gap between low, mid and high tier, no need to widen the gap by giving even more income to high tier nations. You can have reasonable income until the 25k infra jump, and it's good. 2. Why is it good tobuild up shitloads of infra? What's the point?
  17. Well finally Hellas got some war, because our gov was lazy to declare. Have a good fight and let's get better generals!
  18. Why do people try to make admin making a no-war transition period? If you are afraid that you will be declared on you can always choose peace mode (yes i'm talking to you neutrals). If you don't wanna have fun it's ok, but don't prevent others from that. Possibly some people will make some wars, but probably nothing major. This game is the same for ages, people cry that it's the same, then a little change comes up (what will stir things up a bit, but nothing big) and everyone wants the same old shit.
  19. There is a thing called peace mode for people who don't wish to fight in this game.
  20. It works very well in TE, i support implementing it in SE too. It may create some chaos at the start, but it will be fun and finally we get rid of those ghosts :D
  21. Battle support doesn't give me experience, is it intentional or a bug?
  22. Yeah TE is going downhill for a while, it has become repetitive and lost it's good spirit. Change it or kill it.
  23. Hey he's a good fighter. Hey i fought againt him last time and he's good. Also good luck to everyone and enjoy the nukes! :D
×
×
  • Create New...