Stonewall14 Posted June 3, 2015 Report Share Posted June 3, 2015 Run your mouth less and pray a bit more that I don't get nuked down into your range. He may need to do some fasting along with that prayer... :facepalm: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted June 3, 2015 Report Share Posted June 3, 2015 (edited) Run your mouth less and pray a bit more that I don't get nuked down into your range.Oh no, into my range?! That's a threat I've never heard before!I think everybody that knows me knows I'm not scared of war. There's absolutely nothing you can do to these little pissant taxpayers that will enable you to dethrone me. Edited June 3, 2015 by Neo Uruk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth Posted June 3, 2015 Report Share Posted June 3, 2015 Why doesn't DS ever post their own DoWs? Would be interesting to hear why they waited until my war with Stonewall was already expired before they attacked. If DS was defending Stonewall, I would of expected them to attack while that war was still going on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Enema Posted June 3, 2015 Report Share Posted June 3, 2015 Since when does a war on crime need a DOW? You are a known tech scammer and as is such, the normal lacks of laws regarding the declaration of war do not apply.   Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingzog Posted June 3, 2015 Report Share Posted June 3, 2015 ....she spent a good deal of time trying to guide Methrage and in turn he farted in her face.  May you - as well as your aggressors - someday enjoy a truly free brown sphere.  If we're to believe TBM, Methrage's brown sphere is already a bit too free.  (brb....just threw up in my mouth a bit)  Alright, where was I?  2. The last time a world power held a color sphere hostage by violence we fought a world changing war for it. To do so now is the height of barbarity.   I've said this elsewhere, but I see a considerable difference between the NPO's attempt to monopolize Red and what's going on within Brown. The NPO was one alliance attempting to dictate everything that happened on Red. BC are a group of alliances that have come together for a similar purpose, while at the same time being open to the inclusion of more alliances within their ranks.  The difference may be a subtle one, but it's there.  As a spectator, a Brown Civil War could be interesting. It's been a while since I've seen a color turn on itself. If we're lucky, we'll see 'mercenaries' coming from other quarters to lend their support to various sides, all laying waste to Brown while keeping the rest of our world more or less pristine....apart from the radiation, of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stonewall14 Posted June 3, 2015 Report Share Posted June 3, 2015 Why doesn't DS ever post their own DoWs? Would be interesting to hear why they waited until my war with Stonewall was already expired before they attacked. If DS was defending Stonewall, I would of expected them to attack while that war was still going on. We unlike you plan everything and do not just throw our members to the wolves with rash decisions...We have this planned out to the letter and you and your ilk will burn to nothingness with minimal damage to us as possible...We also do not play by your ignorant rules and God forbid we ever do something you would do or approve of... :v: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
megann Posted June 5, 2015 Report Share Posted June 5, 2015 I'm not sure which nutbag to root for. Â Personally, I'm rooting for III%, but then, I have a massive crush on LadyDakota's avatar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stonewall14 Posted June 5, 2015 Report Share Posted June 5, 2015 Â Personally, I'm rooting for III%, but then, I have a massive crush on LadyDakota's avatar. I likes coconuts too! :awesome: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
megann Posted June 5, 2015 Report Share Posted June 5, 2015 I likes coconuts too! :awesome: I don't know who she is, but pretty girls are one of my weaknesses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keelah Posted June 5, 2015 Report Share Posted June 5, 2015 Back on topic, please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth Posted June 6, 2015 Report Share Posted June 6, 2015 Duel on for Lady Dakota. She's out of peace mode finally and I'm out of Anarchy, so no more excuses for either. She's challenged me and sanctioned me after we were suppose to be peacing out with no reason, after having sanctioned me right before for no reason as well. So I will fight her, but without using Sanctions as a Weapon.  Duel Terms: First to move off Brown loses, Duel lasts until expiration if no one moves, but sooner if someone loses..  http://www.cybernations.net/war_information.asp?ID=789416 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freelancer Posted June 6, 2015 Author Report Share Posted June 6, 2015 Duel on for Lady Dakota. She's out of peace mode finally and I'm out of Anarchy, so no more excuses for either. She's challenged me and sanctioned me after we were suppose to be peacing out with no reason, after having sanctioned me right before for no reason as well. So I will fight her, but without using Sanctions as a Weapon.  Duel Terms: First to move off Brown loses, Duel lasts until expiration if no one moves, but sooner if someone loses..  http://www.cybernations.net/war_information.asp?ID=789416 Have you completely lost it ? I'm afk from my PC till this afternoon, and if what you say is true we will honor that with no interference what so ever, I expect you to do the same, If not Margrave I'll consider this as twitching the wrong way and we'll we tried. I assure you she ain't moving off brown, should be a fun month.  Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greywall Posted June 6, 2015 Report Share Posted June 6, 2015 Duel on for Lady Dakota. She's out of peace mode finally and I'm out of Anarchy, so no more excuses for either. She's challenged me and sanctioned me after we were suppose to be peacing out with no reason, after having sanctioned me right before for no reason as well. So I will fight her, but without using Sanctions as a Weapon.  Duel Terms: First to move off Brown loses, Duel lasts until expiration if no one moves, but sooner if someone loses..  http://www.cybernations.net/war_information.asp?ID=789416 Really? Can we get a confirmation from lady Dakota? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth Posted June 6, 2015 Report Share Posted June 6, 2015 (edited) Really? Can we get a confirmation from lady Dakota? She said she would declare when she is able to come out of peace mode after the initial unprovoked sanction. Then proceeded to remind me she is out of peace mode as she threw a second sanction on me with a made up reason; slandering me for no reason. I have nothing but peaceful intentions with brown, but she has chosen to attack me over and over again; despite acting like she favors peace the day before she sabotages it with another sanction after my people sent peace offers. My conflict is with her alone, as she has done everything she can to provoke a fight. However after this duel it will be over, unless III Percent wants a longer war when this is only her facing up to her mistakes and what she started. If she can fight this entire duel without further abusing her Senate seat, I'll recognize her as having realized her mistakes as a Senator. Â Lady Dakota in her second sanction on me (6/4/2015 2:31:05 PM)Â I'm out of peacemode. Just so you know sweetheart. Edited June 6, 2015 by Methrage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freelancer Posted June 6, 2015 Author Report Share Posted June 6, 2015 Lady Dakota in her second sanction on me (6/4/2015 2:31:05 PM) I'm out of peacemode. Just so you know sweetheart.  haha, Now that's funny, lol, How did I miss this Keep something in mind, that first sanction she was ordered to do it, if it was me I'd be going after the person who ordered that sanction, but that's me I operate on different level, if you'd like the name of that person just ask, I'm sure he'll no issue what so ever if you can find someone to bang head with him, but if you do, be warned don't be surprised if a few unexpected guests crash that party.  Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth Posted June 6, 2015 Report Share Posted June 6, 2015 (edited) haha, Now that's funny, lol, How did I miss this Keep something in mind, that first sanction she was ordered to do it, if it was me I'd be going after the person who ordered that sanction, but that's me I operate on different level, if you'd like the name of that person just ask, I'm sure he'll no issue what so ever if you can find someone to bang head with him, but if you do, be warned don't be surprised if a few unexpected guests crash that party.  I forgave the first sanction, it was the second where she put Slander for the reason I couldn't let go; especially since that was after we were suppose to be peacing out and I didn't even respond after she said not to message her again so suddenly, apparently out of anger there would be peace.. It was a complete lie, so I will defend myself against false accusations. I'll do my best to keep guests from crashing the party as long as the other side does the same, but I expect you will do what you do. Its best me and Lady Dakota settle this now, so its over. If that means fighting more of III Percent than just her for the duel, I don't mind.  Lets make it a good fight Sanction free. Edited June 6, 2015 by Methrage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Zigur Posted June 6, 2015 Report Share Posted June 6, 2015 (edited) Freelancer you need to start disciplining your members a little better. A bunch of people with guns is not an army :p Edited June 6, 2015 by Tywin Lannister Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lady Dakota Posted June 6, 2015 Report Share Posted June 6, 2015 (edited) Ok gentleman. Lets clear up a few things. Saying I'm out of peacemode does not give permission or imply that I agree to a duel. It's called a taunt. Now then.... Methrage. Please do forgive me as I'm about to say something very unlady like. You really fucked up. I don't think you quite realize just how much. You started a war, not a duel as we never discussed one between us nor terms of a duel. Therefore I am going to use everything within my arsenal on you Sweetiepie. Edit: I can't spell today. :( Edited June 6, 2015 by Lady Dakota Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth Posted June 6, 2015 Report Share Posted June 6, 2015 Ok gentleman. Lets clear up a few things. Saying I'm out of peacemode does not give permission or imply that I agree to a duel. It's called a taunt. Now then.... Methrage. Please do forgive me as I'm about to say something very unlady like. You really $%&@ed up. I don't think you quite realize just how much. You started a war, not a duel as we never discussed one between nor terms of a duel. Therefore I am going to use everything within my arsenal on you Sweetiepie. You said you were declaring when you came out of peacemode, I said please do. I only saved you the trouble of cowering from your threats/promises any longer.Offering to do this with no sanctions is allowing your side a benefit, considering you've already sanctioned me and sanctions would hurt you more than me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Spanier Posted June 6, 2015 Report Share Posted June 6, 2015 So, LN declared war on III%. III% declared war on LN. Methrage declared a duel. Lady Dakota infers III% now declares war on LN. Â Does this mean LN declares war on III% again, or do they not get a turn yet because Lady Dakota doesn't actually seem to singularly represent III%? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the rebel Posted June 6, 2015 Report Share Posted June 6, 2015 Ok gentleman. Lets clear up a few things. Saying I'm out of peacemode does not give permission or imply that I agree to a duel. It's called a taunt. Now then.... Methrage. Please do forgive me as I'm about to say something very unlady like. You really $%&@ed up. I don't think you quite realize just how much. You started a war, not a duel as we never discussed one between us nor terms of a duel. Therefore I am going to use everything within my arsenal on you Sweetiepie. Â Sanctions and taunting about fighting him, its all here on the forums. Some would say you called him out...and you wonder why he hit you? Â Some people don't when to stop talking and get shocked when their words and actions have consequences. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth Posted June 6, 2015 Report Share Posted June 6, 2015 So, LN declared war on III%. III% declared war on LN. Methrage declared a duel. Lady Dakota infers III% now declares war on LN. Â Does this mean LN declares war on III% again, or do they not get a turn yet because Lady Dakota doesn't actually seem to singularly represent III%? The war they declared on us never ended because she sanctioned me before all the peace offers we sent were accepted, which caused not all wars to be peaced fully. I was wiling to end it with a duel, but the war won't end with her throwing another sanction on me before our alliances are fully done peacing out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lady Dakota Posted June 6, 2015 Report Share Posted June 6, 2015 You said you were declaring when you came out of peacemode, I said please do. I only saved you the trouble of cowering from your threats/promises any longer.Offering to do this with no sanctions is allowing your side a benefit, considering you've already sanctioned me and sanctions would hurt you more than me. That was when we were still at war with LN, thus a taunt. Are you really that dumb? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Spanier Posted June 6, 2015 Report Share Posted June 6, 2015 The war they declared on us never ended because she sanctioned me before all the peace offers we sent were accepted, which caused not all wars to be peaced fully. I was wiling to end it with a duel, but the war won't end with her throwing another sanction on me before our alliances are fully done peacing out. Â Well, depending on if III% doubles down, we may still at least make three wars declared, which I think might be some sort of record at that point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth Posted June 6, 2015 Report Share Posted June 6, 2015 That was when we were still at war with LN, thus a taunt. Are you really that dumb? There was still a war going when you sanctioned me, who decided there wouldn't be peace while that sanction was still on me. I happened to agree, but couldn't counter you until today due to anarchy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts