Jump to content

Joint Poison Clan - iFOK Announcement

Derwood1

By Derwood1
in Alliance Announcements (IC)

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

King Wally Newbie

King Wally

Posted
Posted

[quote name='The MVP' timestamp='1292954557' post='2548496']
It appears as if all of [url="http://www.cybernations.net/stats_alliance_stats_custom.asp?Alliance=nusantara+elite+warriors&input1=poison+clan"]PC won't go in,[/url] that [url="http://www.cybernations.net/stats_alliance_stats_custom.asp?Alliance=Fark&input1=nusantara+elite+warriors"]some of them will.[/url]

To those in PC who left to fight for NEW, nothing bad can be said of you.
[/quote]

That I can respect, the old image of PC i always had obviously still lives on with a few. Good luck to my ally's in Fark in fighting you but at least you guys with conviction can hold their head high when this is over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Branimir Newbie

Branimir

Posted
Posted (edited)

[quote name='Chief Savage Man' timestamp='1292962960' post='2548609']Heh, everybody is mad that Pandora's Box didn't waltz into a stupid war that would pit allies of some members against allies of the other bloc members. Sorry to disappoint.[/quote]
No, I think everybody can understand that its a rational decision. It also shows to what lengths PB will go to read treaties as it wills to avoid all but wars in which it will curbstomp other alliances. And so, some previous nostalgic notions that some sell (friends>infra, etc.) are finally put to rest and it is once again proved that when you are in a position of power all here will at the end of the day do the "realpolitik" thing.

As well, once again it is showed that treaty web is irrelevant, its always whored the way one wants. One more proof that shows its just a symptom, not a cause of anything.

Edited by Branimir
Link to comment
Share on other sites
erikz Newbie

erikz

Posted
Posted

[quote name='Branimir' timestamp='1292963763' post='2548620']
No, I think everybody can understand that its a rational decision. It also shows to what lengths PB will go to read treaties as it wills to avoid all but wars in which it will curbstomp other alliances. And so, some previous nostalgic notions that some sell (friends>infra, etc.) are finally put to rest and it is once again proved that when you are in a position of power all here will at the end of the day do the "realpolitik" thing.
[/quote]
You where asleep when the whole \m/ stuff happened in Jan '10? I remember PC and FOK stepping into a situation where all odds were against them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Branimir Newbie

Branimir

Posted
Posted (edited)

[quote name='erikz' timestamp='1292964522' post='2548633']So why make the silly comment?[/quote]
Because its true, and repeatedly proven true. Did you read your alliance's announcement here?

I am not actually critiquing you, you did a rational thing and it will strengthen your side. Some treaty obligations aside of course,...

Edited by Branimir
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sardonic Newbie

Sardonic

Posted
Posted

[quote name='Branimir' timestamp='1292963763' post='2548620']
It also shows to what lengths PB will go to read treaties as it wills to avoid all but wars in which it will curbstomp other alliances.
[/quote]
You know as well as I do that the only "fair" fight would be one in which we were forced to fight allies. I'm sure all of us in PB would love a fair fight, but not one which would harm those we care about. It's not our fault we're so damn likable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Branimir Newbie

Branimir

Posted
Posted

[quote name='Sardonic' timestamp='1292965349' post='2548649']You know as well as I do that the only "fair" fight would be one in which we were forced to fight allies. I'm sure all of us in PB would love a fair fight, but not one which would harm those we care about. It's not our fault we're so damn likable.[/quote]
Yeah, sure. That sounds so much more better then I put it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
erikz Newbie

erikz

Posted
Posted

[quote name='Branimir' timestamp='1292964823' post='2548641']
Because its true, and repeatedly proven true. Did you read your alliance's announcement here?

I am not actually critiquing you, you did a rational thing and it will strengthen your side. Some treaty obligations aside of course,...
[/quote]
I was referring to the part of your comment where you implied PB alliances would only go in if it was a curbstomp and if they're the ones not being stomped.

Of course our decision was the good one. You know, allies on both sides and all....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
erikz Newbie

erikz

Posted
Posted

[quote name='Steve Buscemi' timestamp='1292965631' post='2548656']
You NPO guys really need to shut up. You did the same thing with the last NSO curb-stomping. When you criticize us, you only incriminate yourself.
[/quote]
Hey Steve, I like you better when you're Nucky. Now you're just yucky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Branimir Newbie

Branimir

Posted
Posted

[quote name='Steve Buscemi' timestamp='1292965631' post='2548656']
You NPO guys really need to shut up.[/quote]
No.

[quote name='Steve Buscemi' timestamp='1292965631' post='2548656']You did the same thing with the last NSO curb-stomping. When you criticize us, you only incriminate yourself.
[/quote]
And now its vice versa too. Hello, brothers :awesome:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Joe Izuzu Newbie

Joe Izuzu

Posted
Posted

[quote name='Steve Buscemi' timestamp='1292965631' post='2548656']
You NPO guys really need to shut up. You did the same thing with the last NSO curb-stomping. When you criticize us, you only incriminate yourself.
[/quote]


Well, with us it was because NSO emphatically told us not to enter. With you guys it is because you told NEW that you wouldn't enter. Kind of a large difference there, don't you think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SonOfHoward Newbie

SonOfHoward

Posted
Posted

[quote name='Steve Buscemi' timestamp='1292965631' post='2548656']
You NPO guys really need to shut up. You did the same thing with the last NSO curb-stomping. When you criticize us, you only incriminate yourself.
[/quote]

I don't think they had any treaty conflicts if you're talking about the NSO-ROK war. There were clear cut sides AFAIK.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dochartaigh Newbie

Dochartaigh

Posted
Posted

[quote name='SonOfHoward' timestamp='1292966308' post='2548680']
I don't think they had any treaty conflicts if you're talking about the NSO-ROK war. There were clear cut sides AFAIK.
[/quote]

treaty conflicts only occur if you hit the ally of an ally. i am not sure if INT or TPE is allied to anyone in PB. FARK is, but that is 1 out of 3 alliances. so this whole "zomg treaty conflict" argument is bs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SonOfHoward Newbie

SonOfHoward

Posted
Posted (edited)

[quote name='Dochartaigh' timestamp='1292966418' post='2548681']
treaty conflicts only occur if you hit the ally of an ally. i am not sure if INT or TPE is allied to anyone in PB. FARK is, but that is 1 out of 3 alliances. so this whole "zomg treaty conflict" argument is bs.
[/quote]

I've said it before; iFOK has treaty conflicts with Fark directly, and INT through LEO.

If anything we could have attacked TPE but seeing as FARK/INT/TPE are a united front it probably wouldn't be such a good idea.

Edited by SonOfHoward
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...