maxwell little Posted August 9, 2010 Report Share Posted August 9, 2010 (edited) After reading the associated IRC logs and forum posts I, The Maxwell Little War Analysis Center ("ML WAC(s you)") have no choice but to declare this war: "[b]Ridiculous[/b]" Stupidity Rating: 9.6/10 - Destroying multiple alliances over one nation's actions +5 - Declaring a war when you know it will escalate and cause massive damage to the aggressor (i.e yourself) +4 - Blatantly and obviously manufacturing an excuse for war (see above) +.6 Validity Rating: 2.3/10 - Rogue/Semi-Rogue nation involved +4 - Strong Defense for Rogue's actions including evidence of provocation -1 - Lack of extremely solid evidence either way -.5 - "WTF" style diplomacy used -.2 (it's getting pretty standard nowadays) Scoring Table (Validity - Stupidity) < -9 --> "WTF" < -9 >-8 --> Hilarious > -8 <-7 --> Ridiculous > -7 < -5 --> Moronic > -5 < -3 --> Moderately Idiotic > -3 < -1 --> Dumb > -1 < 1 --> Random > 1 < 3 --> Overreaction > 3 < 5 --> Exaggeration > 5 < 7 --> Logical 8-) > 7 < 8 --> Altruistic > 8 < 9 --> Saintly > 9 --> Godlike DISCLAIMER: The views expressed above are those of one person only and may not/definitely won't reflect the opinions of any randomly selected group of people and/ornations. PS: WHY ARE THERE NO SMILEYS?? (Good Smileys) Edited August 9, 2010 by Maxwell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Necromancer V4L Posted August 9, 2010 Report Share Posted August 9, 2010 Should include Execution of the war as a factor in there. No matter how dumb it is, the war should get good marks for good execution. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wickedj Posted August 9, 2010 Report Share Posted August 9, 2010 [quote]Destroying multiple alliances over one nation's actions +5[/quote] Simple, solution, dont take in rogues [quote]- Declaring a war when you know it will escalate and cause massive damage to the aggressor (i.e yourself) +4[/quote] oh lawdy mah infras [quote]- Blatantly and obviously manufacturing an excuse for war (see above) +.6[/quote] Uhm, you suck at this...give it up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steodonn Posted August 9, 2010 Report Share Posted August 9, 2010 [quote]- Destroying multiple alliances over one nation's actions +5 [b]( NSO protected a rouge and aided him. NSO fault not one nation)[/b] - Declaring a war when you know it will escalate and cause massive damage to the aggressor (i.e yourself) +4 [b]( apparently not )[/b] - Blatantly and obviously manufacturing an excuse for war (see above) +.6 [b]( debatable )[/b] [/quote] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxwell little Posted August 9, 2010 Author Report Share Posted August 9, 2010 Guys you are taking it too seriously. Also it's preliminary so execution is irrelevant. Also whether or not the nation was actually a rogue is debatable, no side has convincing evidence either way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Olaf Styke Posted August 9, 2010 Report Share Posted August 9, 2010 (edited) ...because this is really a balanced analysis right here... I mean I know you don't care, but still... Edited August 9, 2010 by Olaf Styke Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rabonnobar Posted August 9, 2010 Report Share Posted August 9, 2010 [quote name='wickedj' timestamp='1281317052' post='2405762'] Simple, solution, dont take in rogues [/quote] LOL! Penkala, Kane? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorgrum Posted August 9, 2010 Report Share Posted August 9, 2010 [quote name='Maxwell' timestamp='1281315334' post='2405627'] After reading the associated IRC logs and forum posts I, The Maxwell Little War Analysis Center ("ML WAC(s you)") have no choice but to declare this war: "[b]Ridiculous[/b]" Stupidity Rating: 9.6/10 - Destroying multiple alliances over one nation's actions +5 - Declaring a war when you know it will escalate and cause massive damage to the aggressor (i.e yourself) +4 - Blatantly and obviously manufacturing an excuse for war (see above) +.6 Validity Rating: 2.3/10 - Rogue/Semi-Rogue nation involved +4 - Strong Defense for Rogue's actions including evidence of provocation -1 - Lack of extremely solid evidence either way -.5 - "WTF" style diplomacy used -.2 (it's getting pretty standard nowadays) Scoring Table (Validity - Stupidity) < -9 --> "WTF" < -9 >-8 --> Hilarious > -8 <-7 --> Ridiculous > -7 < -5 --> Moronic > -5 < -3 --> Moderately Idiotic > -3 < -1 --> Dumb > -1 < 1 --> Random > 1 < 3 --> Overreaction > 3 < 5 --> Exaggeration > 5 < 7 --> Logical 8-) > 7 < 8 --> Altruistic > 8 < 9 --> Saintly > 9 --> Godlike DISCLAIMER: The views expressed above are those of one person only and may not/definitely won't reflect the opinions of any randomly selected group of people and/ornations. PS: WHY ARE THERE NO SMILEYS?? (Good Smileys) [/quote] You left out heavy trolling by seemingly unaffliated alliances and thier members, like TOP, MHA etc (We know who you are man!) but nice overall. Im here for the lulz anyway, why so serious? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Pearson Posted August 9, 2010 Report Share Posted August 9, 2010 Going rouge means Attacking your own Allies and then leaving the Alliance. I was one of the people he attacked and Anarchyed. So I doubt his Rouge Status is in question. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevanovia Posted August 9, 2010 Report Share Posted August 9, 2010 If you're so against the war and think it is terrible...then why not do something about it? Help out NSO, defend them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iserlohn Posted August 9, 2010 Report Share Posted August 9, 2010 "Going Rouge" means applying some makeup so you can feel pretty. 0/10 for spelling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Pearson Posted August 9, 2010 Report Share Posted August 9, 2010 The hell you mean 0/10 for spelling, What was misspelled? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
agafaba Posted August 9, 2010 Report Share Posted August 9, 2010 [quote name='Kevanovia' timestamp='1281335994' post='2406927'] If you're so against the war and think it is terrible...then why not do something about it? Help out NSO, defend them. [/quote] As much fun as every war being one half of CN vs the other half (or however the support statistics work out) it doesnt seem feasible. Neutrals get to declare war on both sides in defense of their global radiation levels. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ratonbox Posted August 9, 2010 Report Share Posted August 9, 2010 (edited) [quote name='PearChris' timestamp='1281338564' post='2407038'] The hell you mean 0/10 for spelling, What was misspelled? [/quote] "Rouge" and "rogue" two different words that have completely different meanings. On-topic: the report is pretty lame.. although.. the war might turn out to be just the same. Edited August 9, 2010 by ratonbox Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earogema Posted August 9, 2010 Report Share Posted August 9, 2010 (edited) How can you complain the evidence isn't solid when 3 things exist? 1. Evidence of the rogue's aggressive wars which one could clearly see. Hell, Chron, a member of NSO posts the shot in the war thread. 2. Evidence of Hoo saying he will go to war if you aid that nation. 3. The aid screen of the nation at war. I mean, it's not that the evidence doesn't exist, it's whether that evidence brings us to a conclusion that only war can resolve. And it know it was supposed to be funny but I mean, meh. Edited August 9, 2010 by Earogema Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Letum Posted August 9, 2010 Report Share Posted August 9, 2010 [quote name='Earogema' timestamp='1281345554' post='2407217'] How can you complain the evidence isn't solid when 3 things exist? 1. Evidence of the rogue's aggressive wars which one could clearly see. Hell, Chron, a member of NSO posts the shot in the war thread. 2. Evidence of Hoo saying he will go to war if you aid that nation. 3. The aid screen of the nation at war. I mean, it's not that the evidence doesn't exist, it's whether that evidence brings us to a conclusion that only war can resolve. And it know it was supposed to be funny but I mean, meh. [/quote] The evidence in question deals with the lead-up to No 1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alvis Posted August 9, 2010 Report Share Posted August 9, 2010 This analysis is in itself worthless. Alliances have went to war over reasons which were far more "ridiculous" than RoK's. [quote]Stupidity Rating: 9.6/10 - Destroying multiple alliances over one nation's actions +5 - Declaring a war when you know it will escalate and cause massive damage to the aggressor (i.e yourself) +4 - Blatantly and obviously manufacturing an excuse for war (see above) +.6[/quote] 1 - Sounds like fun. 2 - War escalation than came bring about massive damage? Sounds like more fun. Wait, "(i.e yourself)"? Sounds like someone has b***s, and that deserves a round of honest applause. 3 - As I said before, far more stupid and ill manufactured reasons for war have been given in the past by various other alliances. Other than that, this whole hippie atmosphere of no conflicts and no wars around planet Bob bores the hell out of me (and others, I'm fairly certain of that). A little massive action and drama is welcomed if I do say so myself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotYou Posted August 9, 2010 Report Share Posted August 9, 2010 (edited) [quote name='wickedj' timestamp='1281317052' post='2405762'] Simple, solution, dont take in rogues [/quote] Are you serious? Edited August 9, 2010 by NotYou Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erixxxx Posted August 9, 2010 Report Share Posted August 9, 2010 [quote name='wickedj' timestamp='1281317052' post='2405762'] Simple, solution, dont take in rogues [/quote] I find this funny somehow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schattenmann Posted August 9, 2010 Report Share Posted August 9, 2010 (edited) Regardless of how over-the-top you may or may not think RoK's response is, NSO took in a nation at war with a well-connected alliance and aided the nation rather than simply letting his wars expire. We went [url="http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=89562"]through all this[/url] two weeks ago. What's ridiculous? [quote name='PearChris' timestamp='1281335416' post='2406898'] Going rouge means Attacking your own Allies and then leaving the Alliance. I was one of the people he attacked and Anarchyed. So I doubt his Rouge Status is in question. [/quote] [quote name='Iserlohn' timestamp='1281337165' post='2406978'] "Going Rouge" means applying some makeup so you can feel pretty. 0/10 for spelling. [/quote] [quote name='PearChris' timestamp='1281338564' post='2407038'] The hell you mean 0/10 for spelling, What was misspelled? [/quote] Comedy gold. Edited August 9, 2010 by Schattenmann Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrwuss Posted August 9, 2010 Report Share Posted August 9, 2010 This thread is a lie there is no trace of comedy in the OP. The funny only comes into place much later at the expense going rouge. I prefer it high on the cheekbones. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zzzptm Posted August 9, 2010 Report Share Posted August 9, 2010 Going [b]rouge[/b] can also mean switching to the Red team, like Invicta did recently. [i]"I thought Invicta was purple?" "No, they went [b]rouge[/b]."[/i] It could also mean when a lolcommie alliance gets WAY too serious. [i]"I heard The International declared Year Zero and made all their members sell off all their infrastructure and tech." "Yeah, they went Khmer [b]Rouge[/b], from the looks of it."[/i] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tonder Posted August 9, 2010 Report Share Posted August 9, 2010 [quote name='Erixxxx' timestamp='1281365313' post='2407507'] I find this funny somehow. [/quote] dont worry erixxx its not just you i find that funny too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hymenbreach Posted August 9, 2010 Report Share Posted August 9, 2010 This is some gentle comedy, right here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommac Posted August 9, 2010 Report Share Posted August 9, 2010 so can we call this the 6 millions dollar war lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.