Iserlohn

Anyone mentions drones - 30 drinks (won't happen) "Please proceed, Governor" - Add ice to your drink and pop an Altoid, because :iceburn:

Downvoted so hard, though it doesn't really need it. Except for SRS, Reddit is the scum of the earth. And newbies don't stay because this is a stagnant, deeply flawed game.

....implosion.

Yeah, maybe a nice o - 25% O - 50% [size="4"]O[/size] - 75% or something like that. Really great chart, though.

[quote name='Ayatollah Bromeini' timestamp='1323329470' post='2868838'] You actually spent time writing this. This is literally a thing. [/quote] No, it's just a find and replace of "Charge of the Light Brigade". Which was about a group of cavalrymen who got wrong orders and charged straight into artillery and died.

this is now the tayloj appreciation thread now someone needs to record it

[quote name='Aeros' timestamp='1323310461' post='2868041'] Yeah, I noticed that after. But meh, I'm sure you know what the word is. Hint: [size="1"]Thwarted[/size] [/quote] You also misspelled perseverance.

Jesus, this thread really tanked after goldie's socially awkward penguin.

The ultimate winner of WPE is going to have to be [b]1) Prolific - lots of awful posts 2) Emphatic - very awful posts 3) Consistent - has been posting badly for a long time[/b] Duncan isn't prolific enough to stay (#1). Schattenmann lost out because of #3, since apparently "This Week in Pacifica" or whatever it was called (before my time) was good enough to partially cancel out his going off the deep end later on. There are plenty of other posters that lose out because of #2, but I doubt that they were nominated because the posts weren't awful enough to register in people's minds when they were thinking of people to nominate.

[quote name='ktarthan' timestamp='1300129579' post='2664767'] If NPO made a satire of an apology of dubious sincerity made by Doomhouse to an alliance two years after it had kept said alliance at war for two years, then Doomhouse would retroactively cite said satire in a declaration of war they have already made? [/quote] We've got to go deeper. [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/D8iTd.jpg[/IMG] [b]D O O M H O U S E[/b]

Well, shoot, I hope you can get this resolved. Pretty messed up.

o/ pedophiliac bestiality

Now here are some [b]real[/b] Men at Work.

Am I the only one who would do #8 for fun? I liked the David Lynch version.

[quote name='assarax' timestamp='1296172256' post='2606300'] Perhaps if if the joke had actually been coherent instead of a bunch of inane rambling... Seriously, I thought you all would have wittier responses than what I've seen thus far. What I have seen has left me somewhat disappointed. Where's the hate Legion's so used to? You can do better than that! Pathetic warchests aside, the responses from our buddies over at Doomhouse have been pretty lacking. [/quote] It's not hate, it's pity. It's always been pity. "Worst Alliance Ever" isn't given to the biggest enemy, it's given to the alliance that is worst and fails most at [b]being an alliance.[/b] UPN was a finalist, and it certainly wasn't because they're threatening to anybody. You either 1) failed your blitz, or 2) are holding back for the counter, or 3) you're deliberately doing the minimum possible to fulfill treaty obligations. Assuming the whole point of your attack is to take some heat off NPO, you failed since your blitz was weak and the quality of your attackers was generally low. There's no need to focus especially hard on you, so we can keep doing what we were doing. Additionally, declaring on us alone only delays counters by a day or two, and you've squandered plenty of time already. Tick tock.

[quote name='Mirreille' timestamp='1296113249' post='2605073'] I am glad you liked them. here's another one you might enjoy. I had to wait to see if there were going to be any counters before I used it: [IMG]http://i661.photobucket.com/albums/uu335/Mirreille/Lemmings.jpg[/IMG] [/quote] Those are total number of wars declared by each alliance in their blitz, right?

[quote name='Epiphanus' timestamp='1296106130' post='2604720'] [img]http://i.imgur.com/KzxV6.jpg[/img] Daddy pacifica should really share some warchest insight with you guys :\ [/quote] I, uh, whuh, uh wow.

PA-PER TI-GER

Good luck AO. Make sure to $%&@ them upsilon

This is pretty logical. Attack CCC to convert the infidel, and attack NPO for the seventy-two virgins.

ALLARCHONU AKBAR!

So one of Argent's protectorates (First Earth Battalion) declares on one of NPO's protectorates (Thessaly), for who knows what reason. NPO, rather than resolve the issue with Argent, cuts ties with their protectorate and throws them under the bus. That's... pretty messed up.

[quote name='Beefspari' timestamp='1295416764' post='2583211'] Sweet. I'm very eager to see how the alliance who frequently accepts rogues to stir trouble; tries to generate CBs out of thin air openly; managed to lose more NS in a month than GOONS did when we were being nuked by 20 people; and split apart and fought with itself and lost is going to do against iFOK. Even with the handicap of 6 vs 1, you guys might want to get some help. [/quote] I believe this qualifies as an [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/0kGFq.gif[/IMG]

in before "Celestial Being hereby blah blah blah etc. etc."

Option 9 is nice, but yeah, definitely null vote/Gobb vote.