Jump to content

Clarification from The Legion


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 480
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

[quote name='Imperial' date='11 February 2010 - 10:50 PM' timestamp='1265946635' post='2176372']
As a subordinate government officer to the Imperator, I proceeded as directed by the Imperator to attend the peace negotiations with Sparta. During the course of said peace discussions, an internal veto of the Imperator's decisions was begun. Final signatures were never provided to Sparta or its allies. Unfortunately I could not issue our final signatures to Sparta with the pending veto action looming.
[/quote]

This seems to be the important post of the thread. But seriously, instead of saying everything was fine, you were acting under Hubbs authority, you could have at some point mentioned this was going on?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Sulmar' date='12 February 2010 - 04:41 AM' timestamp='1265949711' post='2176580']
Like I pointed out before, the next article also states that the Consulate needs to approve any war declarations, and in keeping with this, it would only make sense for them to have to approve peace as well.
[/quote]


[quote]D: The Imperator has the ability to declare war, or obtain peace, based on the Legion's current active treaties. [b]Only in the most dire of situations, with the most convicting evidence against another alliance, may the Imperator declare an aggressive war.[/b]
E: The Consulate are the deciding body on the definition of a "dire or warranted" situation. A vote can be called by any Consul asking for evidence that warrants war, or an explanation as to why war was called. A 3/4 majority vote will determine whether war is warranted or not.[/quote]

Looks to me, that only applies if we are talking an offensive war declaration that the Consulate challenges. There is nothing about peace in part E. It makes sense that they would have to approve war declarations as that could easily be detrimental to the alliance, but agreement to a white peace? That is just nonsense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I commend you guys for defending your allies, as it is the honorable thing to do. But; you really need to work out the kinks in your government. First you want peace, then it's off, then we have white peace, but wait we don't. I hope you guys realize that after such developments we are pretty much never likely to offer any form of peace in this war without reps included now. White Peace was offered and denied twice, it may have been because of mishap in your government, but that's not our problem, prepare for a long war.

I'm no government, and this is not an official statement saying White Peace is off the table, I'm just a realist, and I can put 1 and 2 together and it always equals 3. It's pretty obvious to me that this will be the result of this fiasco.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='mitchh' date='12 February 2010 - 04:39 AM' timestamp='1265949577' post='2176572']
The Imperator (Hubb) is the chief executive. The Consulate consists of four other offices. Combined, the Imperator and Consulate vote on treaties, requiring majority for it to pass. The Imperator and Consulate have signed peace agreements jointly in the past, so take that as you will. As an answer to your question, I'd venture that the Imperator 'runs' the alliance, with each office performing their respective alliances. No one person is really in charge.
[/quote]

Sure, I get that. However, according to [i]their[/i] Charter, which is their law, not ours--- "D: The Imperator has the ability to declare war, or obtain peace, based on the Legion's current active treaties. Only in the most dire of situations, with the most convicting evidence against another alliance, may the Imperator declare an aggressive war."

This points to the prior signed, [s]not signed[/s], surrender terms pretty valid. I still cant get it through my head how the Imperator of an alliance would allow an inferior ranking Cabinet/Council member conduct negotiations when it's clear that they had different intentions and even worse, weren't on the same page when it came to the well-fare of their alliance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Sulmar' date='11 February 2010 - 11:45 PM' timestamp='1265949928' post='2176598']
It could be argued that Part E is referring to all wars, in that it says that they have the ability to call a vote to see whether a war is warranted or not.

Regardless, in keeping with the spirit of The Legion's charter, it is obvious that the Consulate is supposed to have some say in matters regarding the alliance; so for the Imperator to just declare peace on his own would be breaking the spirit if not the text of their charter.
[/quote]
Sulmar, the problem is, this isn't about our Charter. The fact is our government did not sign off on our terms, period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Sulmar' date='12 February 2010 - 04:41 AM' timestamp='1265949711' post='2176580']
Like I pointed out before, the next article also states that the Consulate needs to approve any war declarations, and in keeping with this, it would only make sense for them to have to approve peace as well.
[/quote]

In the matter of constitutions and charters, unless designated the broad authority (which in this case they are not) or the specific authority (which in this case they are not) you don't assume that they have an unlisted power because it would "keep with it", particularly in the light of the fact that the matter of making peace is specifically delegated to another branch of the government (which in this case, was the person who agreed).

In all, the mention of war in the consulate article is simply another method of issuing a declaration, and nothing more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='mitchh' date='11 February 2010 - 11:41 PM' timestamp='1265949682' post='2176579']
I must have missed the contradicting statements from the various gov members. Could you direct me to them? :)

All I've seen is logs of Hubb vaguely agreeing to white peace, and Fingolfin denying that this was the intended message. None of which I would call contradicting, as I haven't seen Hubb consent that he definitively agreed to a white peace.
[/quote]
How about the OP

[quote]My authority was in turn overruled this evening by our Imperator, and we were ordered to seek white peace.[/quote]
That's where we were, and where Legion's MoFA was when peace was agreed on.

Edited by Trinite
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Caliph' date='11 February 2010 - 10:58 PM' timestamp='1265947105' post='2176417']
I do too. I love how Karma is hypocritical because they said that they will give white peace to everyone in every war during Karma and after Karma.

oh wait ...
[/quote]

I'd be willing to bet [OOC] 50 tech [/OOC] that TOP and IRON do not get white peace. And even if they do, It will be after C&G turns them into a parking lot. Not saying what they did was right or wrong... but I am just saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='KingEd' date='11 February 2010 - 10:47 PM' timestamp='1265950029' post='2176607']
Sure, I get that. However, according to [i]their[/i] Charter, which is their law, not ours--- "D: The Imperator has the ability to declare war, or obtain peace, based on the Legion's current active treaties. Only in the most dire of situations, with the most convicting evidence against another alliance, may the Imperator declare an aggressive war."

This points to the prior signed, [s]not signed[/s], surrender terms pretty valid. I still cant get it through my head how the Imperator of an alliance would allow an inferior ranking Cabinet/Council member conduct negotiations when it's clear that they had different intentions and even worse, weren't on the same page when it came to the well-fare of their alliance.
[/quote]
Correct. Which is why they get to interpret whether Hubbs supposed consent could be vetoed. How they run their government is mandated by their charter, not foreign entities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Gunnar Griffin' date='12 February 2010 - 04:49 AM' timestamp='1265950148' post='2176613']
Seeking doesn't mean the decision was actually made.
[/quote]

Imperial said the decision was made. You guys should probably stop posting and work out among yourselves what you're doing.

Edited by Kindom of Goon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

its pretty simple if you ask me, our gov asked us if we wanted to surrender after hearing about a possible peace offer, as such, they started a veto which was going to pass. Sparta decided to post it anyway without our permission.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Il Impero Romano' date='11 February 2010 - 11:47 PM' timestamp='1265950043' post='2176609']
In the matter of constitutions and charters, unless designated the broad authority (which in this case they are not) or the specific authority (which in this case they are not) you don't assume that they have an unlisted power because it would "keep with it", particularly in the light of the fact that the matter of making peace is specifically delegated to another branch of the government (which in this case, was the person who agreed).

In all, the mention of war in the consulate article is simply another method of issuing a declaration, and nothing more.
[/quote]
Impero, Please Stop being an idiot. I can't take so much idiocy in one day.
Seriously though, VE is getting butt wooped and you're here trolling. I have tried avoiding this but damn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Il Impero Romano' date='12 February 2010 - 04:24 AM' timestamp='1265948670' post='2176519']
Yes, like I said before, a future charter amendment so this does not happen in the future would probably be wise, as this just plain is not the type of decision that can be vetoed as a matter of practicality.
[/quote]
No, it can be, according to their charter.

You can't E-lawyer using vague concepts of how an absolute leader works. It's ridiculous to even try.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Gunnar Griffin' date='11 February 2010 - 11:47 PM' timestamp='1265950040' post='2176608']
Sulmar, the problem is, this isn't about our Charter. The fact is our government did not sign off on our terms, period.
[/quote]
Yeah, I get that. I was just pointing out that it probably wouldn't be legit anyways. Suggestion though, clean up your war powers articles, they are confusing and hard to interpret. ;)


[quote]

In the matter of constitutions and charters, unless designated the broad authority (which in this case they are not) or the specific authority (which in this case they are not) you don't assume that they have an unlisted power because it would "keep with it", particularly in the light of the fact that the matter of making peace is specifically delegated to another branch of the government (which in this case, was the person who agreed).

In all, the mention of war in the consulate article is simply another method of issuing a declaration, and nothing more.[/quote]
Constitutions and charters are also always up for interpretation with the wording of the text. Indeed, the [ooc]U.S. Supreme Court[/ooc] is set up to do just that, interpret the [ooc]U.S. Constitution[/ooc] as the Founders meant for it to be. While a discussion of judicial activism or judicial restrain could be warranted, it seems to me on Planet Bob we most always go by the intent rather than the actual wording.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='kpcurley' date='11 February 2010 - 08:54 PM' timestamp='1265950468' post='2176637']
facepalm legion. Looks like sparta was being reasonable and your leader recognized that. This is just embarrassing to you my legion brothers.
[/quote]

we dont leave friends behind

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...