Yates Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 Is there any DF nations big enough to attack any TOP nations? Look two posts up. Two is this many: | | Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daikos Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 I'd like to see you honor your treaties when you're grossly outnumbered. Well you go ahead and grossly outnumber our ally and we will be more than happy to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krunk the Great Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 Ok, make it happens so you can see it. you *could* pull an LoSS....except that would be for the next war wouldn't it? (Cancellation periods and whatnot) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 Ok, make it happens so you can see it. An oath is an oath. I don't care enough to work towards that, maybe if you declared on us we would of bothered. However since you didn't declare on us, I don't think you're relevant enough to my interests. However if you do end up in such a situation and not help your ally I'll be there to call you out on it and rub it in your face. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimKongIl Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 PS. We'll beat you in Hearts of Iron any day of the week Which version? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcus Bellator Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 you *could* pull an LoSS....except that would be for the next war wouldn't it? (Cancellation periods and whatnot) I'm still not eBil enought for being able to build war blocs at my will. Still learning this I don't care enough to work towards that, maybe if you declared on us we would of bothered. However since you didn't declare on us, I don't think you're relevant enough to my interests. The fact that you are currently posting there is contraddicting that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Some-Guy Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 PS. We'll beat you in Hearts of Iron any day of the week You poor, delusional fellow. We'll send our heretic EU3 players, to give you half a chance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcus Bellator Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 (edited) However if you do end up in such a situation and not help your ally I'll be there to call you out on it and rub it in your face. Better you find something to do during the waiting. This could be an idea... Which version? 3 v1.3? P.S: this war is getting interesting, it may turns out we will finally find someone to play hoi3 with!!! Edited January 30, 2010 by Marcus Bellator Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 The fact that you are currently posting there is contraddicting that Posting takes less than a minute, gathering support for a war takes effort. I don't care about the majority of the threads I post in, only reason I'm in this thread is to look pretty for the cameras. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deadshot Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 I dare say you won't find one quote of any one of us saying we are waiting for a chance to hit NSO. Most of the stuff we generally say simply critisise your policies and conduct, etc. I don't really care about any grudges your alliance has against ours, we're helping our allies. As for TOP being busy....amazingly, the nations we have attacked had no defensive wars, and quite a few of them had no aggressive wars either - so I would dispute that claim. Ok dude, I will start going through the threads now. With all due respect, you're talking out of your $@!. We go where our allies need us and where it is more strategically sound. Not where the targets we dislike are. It's really a rather simple concept Wentworth. And I have a feeling that if we were to have attacked NSO there would have been a whole different array of bawwwing regarding bandwagoning and attacking you while you're weakened and fighting other targets. I guess the only way to displease you Sith is a 1v1? Sorry. We are too busy in a real war. There would have been no bawwwing I can assure you. From what I know of the Sith, they don't mind it one bit. Also, since you were so quick to point out how unobservant the esteemed Bob Janova is, you should look to my AA before making assumptions that because I defend NSO that I must be a part of NSO. I haven't been there for some time, but I can assure you, if they ever do set up a 1 on 1 with Dark Fist, I will be asking permission to join them again. I fought you once before in a 5 on 1 situation, and I would love to do it again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starcraftmazter Posted January 30, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 I'd like to see you honor your treaties when you're grossly outnumbered. I do believe that most of us are veterans of the Unjust war, where we were all on the Unjust side, and hence we did honour treaties when outnumbered. I do believe I've fought 3 wars outnumbered, and thus you have no right to say anything in that regard. I don't think you're relevant enough to my interests. Good - stop posting here. Ok dude, I will start going through the threads now. With all due respect, you're talking out of your $@!. With all due respect, you're talking out of your $@!. Which version? ooc:/ Well I'm pretty good at 2, haven't played 3 yet. Viluin claims to be the master of 3...but he has a tendency to exaggerate. / Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 Good - stop posting here. Since you told me not to... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jinnai Posted January 31, 2010 Report Share Posted January 31, 2010 (edited) I don't mean to be a dick, but could you please hit IRON or TORN instead? I have to agree. I'd at least want someone who's going to try, not that either of them will find you much of a hassle either. Edited January 31, 2010 by Jinnai Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daikos Posted January 31, 2010 Report Share Posted January 31, 2010 I have to agree. I'd at least want someone who's going to try, not that either of them will find you much of a hassle either. I have no idea what anything you said means after you first sentence. Is it some sort of furry code? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krunk the Great Posted January 31, 2010 Report Share Posted January 31, 2010 I have no idea what anything you said means after you first sentence. Is it some sort of furry code? Im actually agreeing with Daikos???? Indeed, I was also confused by that statement Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chalaskan Posted January 31, 2010 Report Share Posted January 31, 2010 Should have used this as your chance to hit NSO. Lame. That would have taken some cajones. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daikos Posted January 31, 2010 Report Share Posted January 31, 2010 [quote name='Chalaskan' date='30 January 2010 - 11:02 PM' timestamp='1264910524' post='2146491'] That would have taken some cajones. [/quote] I'm curious, what are you huffing and how much of it does it take for that statement to make any damn sense? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Galapagos Posted January 31, 2010 Report Share Posted January 31, 2010 (edited) I guess I'll wish you luck TOP, although your actual adversaries are obviously not here. Edited January 31, 2010 by Galapagos Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mack Truck Posted January 31, 2010 Report Share Posted January 31, 2010 [quote name='Methrage' date='31 January 2010 - 04:55 AM' timestamp='1264877722' post='2145142'] I don't care enough to work towards that, maybe if you declared on us we would of bothered. However since you didn't declare on us, I don't think you're relevant enough to my interests. [/quote] "DF isn't relevant to NSO! We don't care what they do! They just lack the balls to attack us when we're outnumbered and be poor sportsmen because they never back up treaties except when they're fighting TOP because TOP is outnumbered less than we are...or something". NSO whinging is all over the place. Don't expect any coherent thought here, just mindless bawwwwwing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth Posted January 31, 2010 Report Share Posted January 31, 2010 [quote name='Mack Truck' date='31 January 2010 - 04:38 AM' timestamp='1264930734' post='2147243'] "DF isn't relevant to NSO! We don't care what they do! They just lack the balls to attack us when we're outnumbered and be poor sportsmen because they never back up treaties except when they're fighting TOP because TOP is outnumbered less than we are...or something". [/quote] You put quotes around random words and phrases to make it look like your repeating something, but really those are your own words. You came up with all that bawwwing yourself.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mack Truck Posted January 31, 2010 Report Share Posted January 31, 2010 [quote name='Methrage' date='31 January 2010 - 07:48 PM' timestamp='1264931293' post='2147249'] You put quotes around random words and phrases to make it look like your repeating something, but really those are your own words. You came up with all that bawwwing yourself.. [/quote] The words I used were made up by me, yes, but I was putting the gist of NSO members' posts into something more accessible rather than quoting >10 or 20 posts and then giving an in-depth description of why they were bad posts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth Posted January 31, 2010 Report Share Posted January 31, 2010 (edited) [quote name='Mack Truck' date='31 January 2010 - 04:58 AM' timestamp='1264931921' post='2147259'] The words I used were made up by me, yes, but I was putting the gist of NSO members' posts into something more accessible rather than quoting >10 or 20 posts and then giving an in-depth description of why they were bad posts. [/quote] If you believe by saying something different in an incoherent manner you make it more accessible, then maybe you should stop trying to make it so accessible. I think you might be going about it wrong. If what you were trying to do was misrepresent what NSO members have posted, then you might of had the general idea how to go about it, but stringing together incoherently 10 to 20 posts into a few incomplete sentences makes it an obvious misrepresentation. Doesn't even make sense. Edited January 31, 2010 by Methrage Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mack Truck Posted January 31, 2010 Report Share Posted January 31, 2010 [quote name='Methrage' date='31 January 2010 - 09:02 PM' timestamp='1264935725' post='2147313'] If you believe by saying something different in an incoherent manner you make it more accessible, then maybe you should stop trying to make it so accessible. I think you might be going about it wrong. If what you were trying to do was misrepresent what NSO members have posted, then you might of had the general idea how to go about it, but stringing together incoherently 10 to 20 posts into a few incomplete sentences makes it an obvious misrepresentation. Doesn't even make sense. [/quote] Which parts do you find to be misrepresented? The speech was dumbed down to match the quality of the posts but aside from that I think I summed up quite a few of the talking points in this thread. After all, NSO members have criticised DF for attacking the far stronger (than NSO), less piled-on TOP. You did claim that DF was irrelevant and yet take the time to insult them. NSO members have ignored that DF has a treaty with Aircastle which gives them a much better reason to fight TOP rather than fill the few slots left in NSO just to feel smug - and open themselves to even more bandwaggoning comments, of course. Did you see the NSO member(s?) claiming that SCM was a coward who hid behind greater numbers in war all the while saying he was a coward for not helping to further dog-pile NSO? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TehChron Posted January 31, 2010 Report Share Posted January 31, 2010 (edited) [quote name='Mack Truck' date='31 January 2010 - 11:26 AM' timestamp='1264937218' post='2147329'] Which parts do you find to be misrepresented? The speech was dumbed down to match the quality of the posts but aside from that I think I summed up quite a few of the talking points in this thread. After all, NSO members have criticised DF for attacking the far stronger (than NSO), less piled-on TOP. You did claim that DF was irrelevant and yet take the time to insult them. NSO members have ignored that DF has a treaty with Aircastle which gives them a much better reason to fight TOP rather than fill the few slots left in NSO just to feel smug - and open themselves to even more bandwaggoning comments, of course. Did you see the NSO member(s?) claiming that SCM was a coward who hid behind greater numbers in war all the while saying he was a coward for not helping to further dog-pile NSO? [/quote] [quote name='Mack Truck' date='31 January 2010 - 09:38 AM' timestamp='1264930734' post='2147243'] "DF isn't relevant to NSO! We don't care what they do! They just lack the balls to attack us when we're outnumbered and be poor sportsmen because they never back up treaties except when they're fighting TOP because TOP is outnumbered less than we are...or something". NSO whinging is all over the place. Don't expect any coherent thought here, just mindless bawwwwwing. [/quote] [quote name='Chron' date='30 January 2010 - 08:19 AM' timestamp='1264839584' post='2144296'] [b]SCM won't declare a war where the numbers aren't any less than 2-3 times in his favor.[/b] Say all you want about it being smart, but no way in hell can you call it brave. He's had plenty of chances to prove otherwise, and turned all of them down. Edit: [b]We mad? No, we're not mad, we're laughing our @#$% off at how stupid this is. All this time, all this boasting and strutting he's done, and he takes the convenient excuse to sidestep away from the one really good opportunity to make good on his words.[/b] Yeah, Dark Fist will [i]totally[/i] make or break the war effort on TOP. Please. I'm simply shocked someone can be so shameless. [/quote] Reading. It's a wonderful thing. Keep on trucking, Mack. Edited January 31, 2010 by Chron Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mussolandia Posted January 31, 2010 Report Share Posted January 31, 2010 One of the worst alliances I've seen and I've been here for a long time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.