Sooner Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 If I was TPF's MoFA and membership, I'd be questioning why our friends aren't diving in to help us. Forget the Coalition of Cowards reference, TPF's allies are all cowards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coven Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 It's like TPF put ZH into a trojan horse. Then they moved the horse behind the walls, but the war ended and the horse was still there, but the guys in the horse never really liked Agememnon. Though they might have been dating. So after the peace the trojan's made friends with the guys in the horse and the horse guys told them about what the greeks had planned. So the trojans attacked them. Then the greeks said, "but we had peace", and the the trojans were like, "but we didn't know you had planned this dastardly plot behind our walls. Also you were technically fighting the... uh Macedonian Kings. And we didn't have any idea we should have been involved in those talks because we didn't know about this horse." So then the greeks allies were like, "that's totally not a valid reason," and then the trojan's allies were like "we disagree," and then the greek's allies didn't really do anything, but it's totally just like that. Analagies are so fun. Although not entirely right lol, you did an excellent job putting that together. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voodoo Nova Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 Or they are legitimately preparing, seeing as you can not get an entire alliance ready for war on a whim. Especially if the war comes totally out of left field. I've seen alliances get ready for war in 20 minutes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mixoux Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 I've seen alliances get ready for war in 20 minutes. Not like a certain 4 alliances did that or anything~ If you guys really are taking all this time to prepare, it better be a damn good blitz. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Stupid Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 GOOD, NOW SUPPORT THEM MILITARILY YES,YES, AND MORE YES!!!!!! Please, just shut up and defend them as per your treaty! /me needs a target Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalabac Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 (edited) As a new player and someone who doesn't like TPF and mhawk from the history i've read, the aggressors against TPF do not have a leg to stand on. But shame on their "allies" for not honoring their defense treaties when TPF needs... defense. Isn't the event of war the reason these things are signed? or is this concept something I learned wrong Edited December 29, 2009 by Kalabac Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trinite Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 As a new player and someone who doesn't like TPF and mhawk from the history i've read, the aggressors against TPF do not have a leg to stand on. Well if you say so, I guess I'll talk to Athen's about calling off the war. Good thing you pointed this out before anyone else got involved. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earogema Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 (edited) As a new player and someone who doesn't like TPF and mhawk from the history i've read, the aggressors against TPF do not have a leg to stand on.But shame on their "allies" for not honoring their defense treaties when TPF needs... defense. Isn't the event of war the reason these things are signed? or is this concept something I learned wrong That's just it. If they believe so much in TPF, then why don't they defend them? Something here is foul. Not only that, but it just seems odd to me that ZH would want ALL of TPF killed, or TPF's allies. Edited December 29, 2009 by Earogema Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalabac Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 Well if you say so, I guess I'll talk to Athen's about calling off the war. Good thing you pointed this out before anyone else got involved. Point is, I am a completely objective observer pointing out something when something is wrong. In fact, I am biased AGAINST TPF. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penkala Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 Point is, I am a completely objective observer pointing out something when something is wrong. In fact, I am biased AGAINST TPF. Doubtful, but OK. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
junkahoolik Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 Well if you say so, I guess I'll talk to Athen's about calling off the war. Good thing you pointed this out before anyone else got involved. sarcasm is a sign of the weak. just because you are emotionally involved in the story doesn't mean everyone else is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalabac Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 Doubtful, but OK. what? I lurked for over a week then made an account yesterday. Prove that i am some sort of evil TPF spokesman. I dare you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penkala Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 (edited) what? I lurked for over a week then made an account yesterday. Prove that i am some sort of evil TPF spokesman. I dare you. I can't prove it. I just doubt you're an unbiased newb. Edited December 29, 2009 by Penkala Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fantastico Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 what? I lurked for over a week then made an account yesterday. Prove that i am some sort of evil TPF spokesman. I dare you. I don't know if I can prove you are a shill for tpf, but I can prove you are evil. According to your side profile, sex is illegal in your country. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalabac Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 (edited) So you know all about CN history yet you're not quite sure why MDPs are signed but you THINK it's for war? And no, I can't prove it. So what? ok, so it's clear you can't pick up on sarcasm even when made really really obvious. Alright. And you can't even find anything that vaguely implies is. So what? So it means you have nothing to say I don't know if I can prove you are a shill for tpf, but I can prove you are evil. According to your side profile, sex is illegal in your country. Only procreative sex. Human Capital is manufactured via artificial wombs. We are working on eliminating that pesky STD known as "pregnancy" Edited December 29, 2009 by Kalabac Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penkala Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 ok, so it's clear you can't pick up on sarcasm even when made really really obvious. Alright. And you can't even find anything that vaguely implies is. So what? So it means you have nothing to say. Edited out because I reread it and realized it was sarcasm. I'm still not buying it, but nice try. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalabac Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 (edited) Edited out because I reread it and realized it was sarcasm. I'm still not buying it, but nice try. congratulations. But just know that reasonable and 100% objective people know the war is ridiculous. Edited December 29, 2009 by Kalabac Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fantastico Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 (edited) congratulations. But just know that 90% reasonable and 100% objective people know the war is ridiculous. What about 90% objective and 100% reasonable people? Cause that's where I am. edit: how did you edit that so fast? :fixed it: Edited December 29, 2009 by Fantastico Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penkala Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 congratulations. But just know that reasonable and 100% objective people know the war is ridiculous. Actually reasonable people can debate whether during a war launching plans to internally destroy a community is acceptable. Only TPF or their allies say it's "100% ridiculous". Others think it's acceptable, or a good CB, and some think it's a great CB. But very few discount the entire thing except for TPF and its allies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalabac Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 Actually reasonable people can debate whether during a war launching plans to internally destroy a community is acceptable. Only TPF or their allies say it's "100% ridiculous". Others think it's acceptable, or a good CB, and some think it's a great CB. But very few discount the entire thing except for TPF and its allies. Ok, so why is GATO not attacking NPO for nukes in GW3? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yerushalayim Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 (edited) Ok, so why is GATO not attacking NPO for nukes in GW3? Because nukes aren't a covert, deceitful, and underhanded attempt to infiltrate and destroy a community from within? And NPO didn't conveniently forget to mention that it used nukes? Edited December 29, 2009 by Yerushalayim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalabac Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 nukes are explosive, infra eating, mad making meanyheads. Why do you think your adjectives make one act of war OK to dredge up? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raasaa Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 Ok, so why is GATO not attacking NPO for nukes in GW3? nobody is stopping them from doing it...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yerushalayim Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 (edited) nukes are explosive, infra eating, mad making meanyheads. Why do you think your adjectives make one act of war OK to dredge up? Nukes still have nothing to do with the CB. TPF set in motion an op that pretty much all of us can agree is unacceptable. They targeted an alliance they were not in open hostilities with. And they didn't think it would be a good idea to, y'know, inform Athens "Hey, so, we set this thing up, and it's done now, but you might want to watch those new friends of yours"? By the way, why Athens? Why not an alliance TPF was actually at war with? I ask out of curiosity. Edited December 29, 2009 by Yerushalayim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leftbehind Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 By the way, why Athens? Why not an alliance TPF was actually at war with? I ask out of curiosity. I think its been said that they believed Athens would have been the easier alliance to infiltrate due to Athens being a "merger" alliance. Also one can assume that Athens would have been a good choice due to their closeness to MK and other karma alliances. I don't understand it completely tho. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.