Syan Wilmont Posted December 24, 2009 Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 Egotistic eh? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wickedj Posted December 24, 2009 Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 If they had a spine and really believed even half the crap they posted in the original discussion they would have declared.Since they didn't and we all know they won't... Pretty sure it was NSO who went to DF with demands and NSO who said DF's topic was considered a declaration of war.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EgoFreaky Posted December 24, 2009 Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 As I said in the other topic, I will be happy to provide evidence just as soon as DF provides evidence of the accusations it made towards NSO. Since I am certain DF's allies all required evidence to validate their support of DF over this issue I am certain they understand completely, right? Nope i'm pretty sure NSO itself is all the reason their allies need. Really not much convincing to do Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lennox Posted December 24, 2009 Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 I would like to take this opportunity to demand 500 tech in reparations and demand that you apologize for posting your fake apology, without providing concrete evidence of it. You have until update. Ah, that seems a little hypocritical. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delta1212 Posted December 24, 2009 Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 If that were true you and I would be roommates. Oh honey, we wouldn't even live in the same building. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pyroman Posted December 24, 2009 Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 I would like to take this opportunity to demand 500 tech in reparations and demand that you apologize for posting your fake apology, without providing concrete evidence of it. You have until update. Extortion eh? You're right, you guys are better than the NSO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starcraftmazter Posted December 24, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 Ah, that seems a little hypocritical. I learn from the master - Ivan Moldavi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cairna Posted December 24, 2009 Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 I would like to take this opportunity to demand 500 tech in reparations and demand that you apologize for posting your fake apology, without providing concrete evidence of it. You have until update. Two minutes till go time then. Hope you guys will have time to quad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shodemofi-NPO Posted December 24, 2009 Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 (edited) Nope i'm pretty sure NSO itself is all the reason their allies need.Really not much convincing to do So...you would have allowed an irrational hatred of the NSO to cloud your judgment? Doesn't seem like the best way to do politics, but I suppose that's your prerogative. Edited December 24, 2009 by Shodemofi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mixoux Posted December 24, 2009 Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 Extortion eh? You're right, you guys are better than the NSO. Comparing someone to NSO is a quick way to get an ultimatum sent to you. You have until update (~1 minute) to retract that statement or else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorbolt Posted December 24, 2009 Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 Heh, I'm sure you all ought to be aware of the offensive connotations of Indian Giver. Choose a different phrase maybe? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wickedj Posted December 24, 2009 Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 Extortion eh? You're right, you guys are better than the NSO. Good to see you admitting that NSO was indeed trying to extort DF yesterday. always like you Pyro im glad you came around Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daverice Posted December 24, 2009 Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 Everyone owes me 50 tech, you promised and then forgot about it. I don't have proof but it's true. No big deal though, you can all get in line and send it ASAP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Griff Posted December 24, 2009 Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 You just had to get that last jab in, eh SCM? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan Moldavi Posted December 24, 2009 Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 I would like to take this opportunity to demand 500 tech in reparations and demand that you apologize for posting your fake apology, without providing concrete evidence of it. You have until update. Good. Thank you for verifying that your initial claims are baseless, unfounded and false. Please, declare on NSO. Hell, I tell you what, you declare on NSO and let NSO and DF fight one on one, no allies, no treaties, let's make it easy. One round, no nukes, white peace at the end. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mamazlilmistake Posted December 24, 2009 Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 This is so freaking lame. IF you guys are not going to attack at least post funny pictures so i can be less bored Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan Moldavi Posted December 24, 2009 Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 Good to see you admitting that NSO was indeed trying to extort DF yesterday. always like you Pyro im glad you came around I was not online. Anything that was conducted yesterday as far as a request for tech would have been overturned upon my return. Aside from that, it was withdrawn yesterday shortly after the initial comment on it was made. So I fail to see your point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wickedj Posted December 24, 2009 Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 Please, declare on NSO.Hell, I tell you what, you declare on NSO and let NSO and DF fight one on one, no allies, no treaties, let's make it easy. One round, no nukes, white peace at the end. Aww more of this 1v1 stuff? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pyroman Posted December 24, 2009 Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 Comparing someone to NSO is a quick way to get an ultimatum sent to you.You have until update (~1 minute) to retract that statement or else. Ultimatum first, attack later. At least read the manual. Good to see you admitting that NSO was indeed trying to extort DF yesterday. always like you Pyro im glad you came around I didn't admit anything. I simply pointed out that DF was trying to extort them, and then ironically claimed they were better than the NSO, implying, of course, that they are indeed the classless scum they want to destroy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youwish959 Posted December 24, 2009 Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 (edited) Heh, I'm sure you all ought to be aware of the offensive connotations of Indian Giver.Choose a different phrase maybe? 1. indian giver buy indian giver mugs, tshirts and magnets Indian Giver There are two popular etymologies for this term for a person who gives a gift only to later demand its return. The first is that it is based on an unfair stereotype of Native Americans, that they don't keep their word. In the other popular explanation, the term doesn't cast aspersions on Native Americans, instead it echoes the broken promises the whites made to the Indians. Neither is accurate, although the first is closer to the truth. Try again. Edited December 24, 2009 by youwish959 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The AUT Posted December 24, 2009 Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 Good.Thank you for verifying that your initial claims are baseless, unfounded and false. Please, declare on NSO. Hell, I tell you what, you declare on NSO and let NSO and DF fight one on one, no allies, no treaties, let's make it easy. One round, no nukes, white peace at the end. You two. admin takes you out back and deletes both your alliances. No white peace, no damage, no problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thedestro Posted December 24, 2009 Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 Good.Thank you for verifying that your initial claims are baseless, unfounded and false. Please, declare on NSO. Hell, I tell you what, you declare on NSO and let NSO and DF fight one on one, no allies, no treaties, let's make it easy. One round, no nukes, white peace at the end. You're not helping your case here Ivvie, NSO cared to threaten CSN with war and then backed away from war...you know - when they remembered that they only fight wars where they outnumber the opposition by a lot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farnsworth Posted December 24, 2009 Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 (edited) What's weak about denying an apology that was never made, Farns?I call it setting the record straight. The tl;dr is that NSO's announcement is a complete and utter joke, and they're trying (poorly) to play off of DF's announcement. You're definitely right, Aurion; denying a nonexistent apology is setting the record straight. While I failed to state it specifically, I did imply that I believe (lol assume) the apology was given. It's entirely possible that an apology was not given, in which case SCM is right to respond with his refutation. At this point I am doubting that NSO has falsified their claims of DF's (official or unofficial?) apology, though, as previously stated, I could totally be wrong and it should be provable. Also, it's quite possible NSO is simply making a point here: DF has accusations without evidence. NSO has an apology without evidence. If you believe one you should believe the other. Current opinion: Withholding judgment. Yes, it's a copout, but really more information is necessary. edit: Might I add, I still stand by my statement that denying the existence of an (actual) apology is weak. Edited December 24, 2009 by Farnsworth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EgoFreaky Posted December 24, 2009 Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 So...you would have allowed an irrational hatred of the NSO to cloud your judgment? Doesn't seem like the best way to do politics, but I suppose that's your prerogative. Lat time I checked I wasn't allied to DF.. Best way to do politics is check the treaty web before acting or talking Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starcraftmazter Posted December 24, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 Good.Thank you for verifying that your initial claims are baseless, unfounded and false. Okey, maybe just a personal apology from you? Please, declare on NSO.Hell, I tell you what, you declare on NSO and let NSO and DF fight one on one, no allies, no treaties, let's make it easy. One round, no nukes, white peace at the end. Sorry, I don't think we have the guts to go through with our threat And I'm glad you see it was a threat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.