Haflinger Posted August 12, 2009 Report Share Posted August 12, 2009 Are you suggesting that the New Sith Order is inconsequential? That's an odd thing to say on the 34th page of one of our threads. It's also pretty ironic coming from Legion. I normally don't have any issues with Legion, but what exactly is it you all do besides hoard your infrastructure? In the past war, Legion fought nine alliances, one sanctioned, in defense of their treaty partners. Argue with him about NSO's status all you want, but I think calling them infra hoarders is not justifiable in light of recent events. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starcraftmazter Posted August 12, 2009 Report Share Posted August 12, 2009 Why is that funny? I enjoy making fun of other people's ignorance. It is easy to be bold when one is inconsequential. A wonderful motto for NSO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivellios Posted August 12, 2009 Report Share Posted August 12, 2009 Starcraft you give your alliance a bad name freind..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starcraftmazter Posted August 12, 2009 Report Share Posted August 12, 2009 (edited) Starcraft you give your alliance a bad name freind..... But at least I can sleep easy at night knowing the name of my alliance will never be as bad as that of yours Edited August 12, 2009 by Starcraftmazter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingzog Posted August 12, 2009 Report Share Posted August 12, 2009 But at least I can sleep easy at night knowing the name of my alliance will never be as bad as that of yours Were it not for my former alliance's participation in NOIR, I never would have heard of yours. I'll take "bad name" over "no name" any day of the week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daikos Posted August 12, 2009 Report Share Posted August 12, 2009 Starcraft you give your alliance a bad name freind..... We disagree. Were it not for my former alliance's participation in NOIR, I never would have heard of yours.I'll take "bad name" over "no name" any day of the week. Then you are a fool. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starcraftmazter Posted August 12, 2009 Report Share Posted August 12, 2009 (edited) I'll take "bad name" over "no name" any day of the week. In that case, you are in a very appropriate alliance, given the only way it can make a name for itself is by being bad. It's kind of sad really. OOC: Kind of like that kid at school who bullies others in order to get attention because his uncle touches him. Edited August 12, 2009 by Starcraftmazter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan Moldavi Posted August 12, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 12, 2009 Aside from your constant fan boi comments on our threads I have never heard of your alliance at all. Good job. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Severus Snape Posted August 12, 2009 Report Share Posted August 12, 2009 In that case, you are in a very appropriate alliance, given the only way it can make a name for itself is by being bad. It's kind of sad really.OOC: Kind of like that kid at school who bullies others in order to get attention because his uncle touches him. No, Potter. Warned for OOC flamebaiting/trolling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nadabethyname Posted August 12, 2009 Report Share Posted August 12, 2009 i've heard of them and i love you scm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingzog Posted August 12, 2009 Report Share Posted August 12, 2009 We disagree.Then you are a fool. ahhh...."No U", has been ages since I've seen thee. In that case, you are in a very appropriate alliance, given the only way it can make a name for itself is by being bad. It's kind of sad really.OOC: Kind of like that kid at school who bullies others in order to get attention because his uncle touches him. I'm not sure whether you're attacking my current or former alliance. Either way, congratulations on having hit a new low in argumentation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corinan Posted August 12, 2009 Report Share Posted August 12, 2009 In the past war, Legion fought nine alliances, one sanctioned, in defense of their treaty partners. Argue with him about NSO's status all you want, but I think calling them infra hoarders is not justifiable in light of recent events. Then I stand corrected and I apologize. Still, to try to insinuate that the New Sith Order is inconsequential is just silly. You can love us or you can hate us but when we speak, the Cyberverse listens. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric Cantona Posted August 12, 2009 Report Share Posted August 12, 2009 Then you are a fool. *Referee whistles* No no no. Name calling gets you a yellow card. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starcraftmazter Posted August 12, 2009 Report Share Posted August 12, 2009 I'm not sure whether you're attacking my current or former alliance. Either way, congratulations on having hit a new low in argumentation. Would that be the former alliance which I argued in favour of being accepted into NOIR based on the same moral principles that I am arguing now? I trust you would not have referred to those arguments as being "a new low" - but alas, it is funny how quickly opinions can change. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan Moldavi Posted August 12, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 12, 2009 Would that be the former alliance which I argued in favour of being accepted into NOIR based on the same moral principles that I am arguing now? I trust you would not have referred to those arguments as being "a new low" - but alas, it is funny how quickly opinions can change. What "moral principles" are you espousing in this discussion? The only commentary that I have ever seen from you is some disparaging remarks on the NSO. I didn't know jealousy and sour grapes were moral platitudes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Flinders Posted August 12, 2009 Report Share Posted August 12, 2009 (edited) Would that be the former alliance which I argued in favour of being accepted into NOIR based on the same moral principles that I am arguing now? I trust you would not have referred to those arguments as being "a new low" - but alas, it is funny how quickly opinions can change. I suppose it's worth making clear that Kingzog does not speak for NoR at this time. And I know who you are Edited August 12, 2009 by Captain Flinders Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingzog Posted August 12, 2009 Report Share Posted August 12, 2009 (edited) Would that be the former alliance which I argued in favour of being accepted into NOIR based on the same moral principles that I am arguing now? I trust you would not have referred to those arguments as being "a new low" - but alas, it is funny how quickly opinions can change. Read the part I quoted again. Or are you really that obtuse? I suppose it's worth making clear that Kingzog does not speak for NoR at this time. I suppose it's worth noting that I didn't claim to, and that your bringing this up is irrelevant. Edited August 12, 2009 by kingzog Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Flinders Posted August 12, 2009 Report Share Posted August 12, 2009 I suppose it's worth noting that I didn't claim to, and that your bringing this up is irrelevant. There seemed to be some confusion on the part of Starcraftmazter as to your affiliation. I was clearing it up for him or any others who were similarly confused. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Tuttle Posted August 12, 2009 Report Share Posted August 12, 2009 Back on topic or more warns will be handed out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmansfield68 Posted August 12, 2009 Report Share Posted August 12, 2009 A wonderful doctrine, Ivan! Here's to sovereignty! <drinks> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vizard Posted August 12, 2009 Report Share Posted August 12, 2009 (edited) Hmm...this has grown into an interesting thread... I for one, am happy that the Moldavi Doctrine has been re-instated somewhere. Edited August 12, 2009 by Mordecai Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kzoppistan Posted August 12, 2009 Report Share Posted August 12, 2009 (edited) It is, with some difficulty, time to admit that I was mistaken about this announcement and to apologize to the NSO. My previous comments were in poor form and less about the announcement as they were about trying to pick an argument. While I know most NSO members would like a good verbal dust up, this was not the proper place to do it. I guess I was just having a bad day. After some thought, I can see the merits of this proclamation, and find NSO's effort to reverse the trend seen in the last war commendable. I retract my previous statements and humbly ask the NSO to overlook my transgression of diplomacy as a momentary lapse of courtesy brought on by a spat of misplaced anger. I look forward to further announcements from NSO, and am eager to see their forward thinking impact on Planet Bob, and wish them the best of luck. Edited August 13, 2009 by Kzoppistan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivellios Posted August 12, 2009 Report Share Posted August 12, 2009 Well thank you Kzoppistan, we appreciate it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bumpy Posted August 12, 2009 Report Share Posted August 12, 2009 /me smiles and waves to Chron. Yes, it's me; Bumpy of Bumpivania; Scourge of Eureka, Founder of the Grey Council, the very root of the Order of The Black Rose. I am now an itinerant Parthian, content, for the most part, to walk away. I suppose there's no use denying verbosity; well known for waxing loquacious, I rather enjoy the flavors imparted by just the 'right' choice of words; so much so that I am moved to comment that verbiage of the Moldavi Doctrine evokes a broad pallet of sensory glee as a cornucopia of delight cascades from the eloquence of part IV rather like a tart candied apple whose tang breaks through the hard candy shell; yes, candied apples with hints of candyfloss and clowns. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lennox Posted August 12, 2009 Report Share Posted August 12, 2009 /me smiles and waves to Chron.Yes, it's me; Bumpy of Bumpivania; Scourge of Eureka, Founder of the Grey Council, the very root of the Order of The Black Rose. I am now an itinerant Parthian, content, for the most part, to walk away. I suppose there's no use denying verbosity; well known for waxing loquacious, I rather enjoy the flavors imparted by just the 'right' choice of words; so much so that I am moved to comment that verbiage of the Moldavi Doctrine evokes a broad pallet of sensory glee as a cornucopia of delight cascades from the eloquence of part IV rather like a tart candied apple whose tang breaks through the hard candy shell; yes, candied apples with hints of candyfloss and clowns. My that was a whimsical description of Article IV Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.