KingSuck Posted March 8, 2009 Report Share Posted March 8, 2009 It really says a lot about the calibre of sheep we have around here these days. Top notch. heh, I was thinking the same thing :lol: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
astronaut jones Posted March 8, 2009 Report Share Posted March 8, 2009 I would take CSN over NSO anyday of the week. Really? I wouldn't. What the hell's a csn, anyway? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Savage Man Posted March 8, 2009 Report Share Posted March 8, 2009 With such capable leaders, the sky is the limit. Good luck, NSO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JayOvfEnnay Posted March 8, 2009 Report Share Posted March 8, 2009 Tbh my prediction the same day Ivan made the DoE was that within 6 months they will have a sanction. I do not doubt that eventually they will pass NPO. And I will clap them along the entire way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trout Posted March 8, 2009 Report Share Posted March 8, 2009 It really says a lot about the calibre of sheep we have around here these days. Top notch. Baa Baa to you, sir. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
President Obama Posted March 8, 2009 Report Share Posted March 8, 2009 I would take CSN over NSO anyday of the week. Even on a Tuesday? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redoran Posted March 8, 2009 Report Share Posted March 8, 2009 MK also had a very impressive growth rate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Bad Posted March 8, 2009 Report Share Posted March 8, 2009 Really? I wouldn't. What the hell's a csn, anyway? Yes, CSN has a long history and went into the meat grinder to support an ally. NSO so far has formed and while they have managed to get a few good people they also have collected a great deal more of, well, not so good people. The question is can the few people of quality keep from being overwelmed by the others. It will be interesting to watch anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Litler Posted March 8, 2009 Report Share Posted March 8, 2009 Ivan's like a shepard to lambs to the slaughter of a flock. Just what are you implying? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heft Posted March 8, 2009 Report Share Posted March 8, 2009 Yes, CSN has a long history and went into the meat grinder to support an ally. NSO so far has formed and while they have managed to get a few good people they also have collected a great deal more of, well, not so good people. The question is can the few people of quality keep from being overwelmed by the others. It will be interesting to watch anyway. There are a number of people with spotty histories in NSO, yes, but from what I've seen they are all committed to this project. I'm confident that it is possible, given the right culture and the right outlets, for any of our members, regardless of history, to become productive, contributing Sith. Also, we don't plan on tolerating any stupidity. Everyone has a chance to prove themselves in the Order, but they will not be coddled or insulated from the consequences of their own actions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
astronaut jones Posted March 9, 2009 Report Share Posted March 9, 2009 Yes, CSN has a long history and went into the meat grinder to support an ally. NSO so far has formed and while they have managed to get a few good people they also have collected a great deal more of, well, not so good people. The question is can the few people of quality keep from being overwelmed by the others. It will be interesting to watch anyway. The quality you speak of is subjective. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heyman Posted March 9, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 9, 2009 Just what are you implying? I'm catering to both views concerning the creation of the New Sith Order. Also: !define Ivan_Moldavi at #botmonkey. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan Moldavi Posted March 9, 2009 Report Share Posted March 9, 2009 I am confused on why so many believe the NSO will be attacked. We are just getting started and concentrating on internal issues with very limited diplomatic involvement and no support of the prevalent agendas so I believe we are actually much safer than some of the existing die hard alliances on either "side". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unko Kalaikz Posted March 9, 2009 Report Share Posted March 9, 2009 I am confused on why so many believe the NSO will be attacked. We are just getting started and concentrating on internal issues with very limited diplomatic involvement and no support of the prevalent agendas so I believe we are actually much safer than some of the existing die hard alliances on either "side". What my Lord says is true. We have not provided a reason to attack us, why would anyone do so? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Margrave Posted March 9, 2009 Report Share Posted March 9, 2009 I am confused on why so many believe the NSO will be attacked. We are just getting started and concentrating on internal issues with very limited diplomatic involvement and no support of the prevalent agendas so I believe we are actually much safer than some of the existing die hard alliances on either "side". Because you are Ivan Moldavi, and enough people believe that the NPO or some ally of it will roll you because the IO's, The Illuminati, or whatever super-secret mystery organization they think runs the game will want you and yours destroyed. The fact is that many alliances have been attacked for what many call "bad" or non-existent CB's, and a good deal of people believe the Tyrants (all rights reserved to Pacifica) will want you destroyed and dishonored. Junka, you should know better than to play it off like you have no idea why you and yours might get rolled, I expect better of even someone like you who betrayed their cause. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unko Kalaikz Posted March 9, 2009 Report Share Posted March 9, 2009 (edited) Here's to the next million NS accomplishment! Edited March 9, 2009 by Count da Silva Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Margrave Posted March 9, 2009 Report Share Posted March 9, 2009 Here's to the next million NS accomplishment! It's okay Junka, ignore reality until it catches up with you. Not with NSO mind you, but with you. A Traitor's Fate is a bad one, Junka. I hope you know that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unko Kalaikz Posted March 9, 2009 Report Share Posted March 9, 2009 Somebody is holding onto a grudge and it isn't me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sileath Posted March 9, 2009 Report Share Posted March 9, 2009 (edited) To our eventual sanctioning! Edited March 9, 2009 by Sileath Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Margrave Posted March 9, 2009 Report Share Posted March 9, 2009 Somebody is holding onto a grudge and it isn't me. To betray the Orders in any fashion, to betray the Pax Pacifica as you did, I could almost understand...almost. After all, a man has to stand up and do what he believes in. But then to betray your own cause? And now speak against it? Truly, a turn-coat is the lowest of men. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unko Kalaikz Posted March 9, 2009 Report Share Posted March 9, 2009 (edited) I'm not going to be tempted by your games Margrave. [OOC] I made a Lent pledge with God to fast from certain negative online interactive tendencies or calling people out in RL and I keep things civil and constructive.[/ooc] Please do not force me to inform my staff to ignore your messages. Have a nice day Edited March 9, 2009 by Count da Silva Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blacky Posted March 9, 2009 Report Share Posted March 9, 2009 Perhaps the only person to start 2 sanctioned alliances who are sanctioned at the same time. No easy feat. Nope, GGA and Fark were sanctioned at the same time for quite a while. Both started by theblitz, who also was a notable leader of NAAC for a while. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timeline Posted March 9, 2009 Report Share Posted March 9, 2009 I am confused on why so many believe the NSO will be attacked. We are just getting started and concentrating on internal issues with very limited diplomatic involvement and no support of the prevalent agendas so I believe we are actually much safer than some of the existing die hard alliances on either "side". With so many high power members from other alliances joining NSO, your anything but safe, but i wish you well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan Moldavi Posted March 9, 2009 Report Share Posted March 9, 2009 Because you are Ivan Moldavi, and enough people believe that the NPO or some ally of it will roll you because the IO's, The Illuminati, or whatever super-secret mystery organization they think runs the game will want you and yours destroyed. The fact is that many alliances have been attacked for what many call "bad" or non-existent CB's, and a good deal of people believe the Tyrants (all rights reserved to Pacifica) will want you destroyed and dishonored. I find it amusing that so many here would seek to speak on behalf of the New Pacific Order without the authority to do so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Griff Posted March 9, 2009 Report Share Posted March 9, 2009 With so many high power members from other alliances joining NSO, your anything but safe, but i wish you well. No one is truly safe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.