Jump to content

Sanctioned Alliance Images


Vivi

Recommended Posts

[quote name='lonewolfe2015' date='14 May 2010 - 09:17 PM' timestamp='1273868202' post='2297961']
I thought we were allowed to edit our flags periodically if we won TE so long as it didn't become a burden? Wasn't that the rule at least?
[/quote]

Well that's what we all thought, when Inst asked admin he said he can't change the flag and is only allowed to submit "minor" adjustments to the current flag. It's ridiculous really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

[quote name='Banksy' date='16 May 2010 - 07:49 AM' timestamp='1274010523' post='2299710']
It is a little odd, TFD was allowed two flags. Why were they allowed to submit a second one and MK isn't? What if MK were to decide to adopt the Vanguard symbol as their official alliance flag?
[/quote]

TFD's flags came from the winners of two separate rounds of TE so TFD didn't submit any flags, the winners of those TE rounds just happened to submit two different flags of TFD. Somewhat of a different situation but yeah I agree that MK should probably be allowed another flag for getting sanction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='ShadowDragon' date='17 May 2010 - 07:56 AM' timestamp='1274036167' post='2300081']
TFD's flags came from the winners of two separate rounds of TE so TFD didn't submit any flags, the winners of those TE rounds just happened to submit two different flags of TFD. Somewhat of a different situation but yeah I agree that MK should probably be allowed another flag for getting sanction.
[/quote]
But the reasoning for not letting MK have another flag is that 'they already have one.' TFD already had one, and yet they are allowed a second. It seems to be inconsistant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Banksy' date='16 May 2010 - 03:17 PM' timestamp='1274044659' post='2300306']
But the reasoning for not letting MK have another flag is that 'they already have one.' TFD already had one, and yet they are allowed a second. It seems to be inconsistant.
[/quote]
Actually, I think the purpose of the flag for getting sanctioned is so the alliance can be represented. That's not the purpose of the TE flag.

Regardless I still don't agree but it's not our choice <_<

Edited by Drai
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

[quote name='Drai' date='17 May 2010 - 07:45 AM' timestamp='1274100317' post='2301157']
Actually, I think the purpose of the flag for getting sanctioned is so the alliance can be represented. That's not the purpose of the TE flag.

Regardless I still don't agree but it's not our choice <_<
[/quote]
Have we heard anything from admin about not being allowed a flag for being sanctioned?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Chickenzilla' date='26 May 2010 - 01:36 AM' timestamp='1274834192' post='2311809']
Have we heard anything from admin about not being allowed a flag for being sanctioned?
[/quote]

I believe we are still waiting on a reply from someone else, possibly SoE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Believland' date='31 May 2010 - 06:44 AM' timestamp='1275313433' post='2317713']
You guys should have gone with the Johan one.
[/quote]

We will go with the Johan one when all our dignity is gone :ph34r:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...