Duderonomy Posted March 26, 2015 Report Share Posted March 26, 2015 Gotta catch 'em all! Now you sound like Kaskus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
white majik Posted March 26, 2015 Report Share Posted March 26, 2015 This is good news. Though DT, you're gonna have to change your flag... Congrats, allies. If only we could think of a catchy name for a 3 way treaty that isn't a bloc, this sig could be useful Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tehmina Posted March 26, 2015 Report Share Posted March 26, 2015 Looks good! Congrats NPO and DT :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Kiloist Posted March 26, 2015 Report Share Posted March 26, 2015 Mmmm, nothing like a nice party that goes wrong. o/ Pacifica o/ DT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunterman1043 Posted March 26, 2015 Report Share Posted March 26, 2015 Why not just treaty DBDC instead of one of their satellite pseudo-alliances? What exactly in your definition is a "satellite pseudo-alliance" anyway? lol Satellite...... I could certainly understand from a limited point of view, but pseudo? Come on man, that's just mean. lol. Our nukes are as legit as legit comes. Remember that. ;) ANYWAY o/ DT o/ NPO Glad this happened. At first, I'll admit I opposed this treaty but after a couple of months dealing with the new government, I have to say that they won me over. Here's to a long fruitful relationship...... And epic LAN parties! lol Also, shout out to anyone who can remember the game these cheats go to: laimlame lapostal lamaxout Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeroofTime55 Posted March 26, 2015 Report Share Posted March 26, 2015 What exactly in your definition is a "satellite pseudo-alliance" anyway? lol Satellite...... I could certainly understand from a limited point of view, but pseudo? Come on man, that's just mean. lol. Our nukes are as legit as legit comes. Remember that. ;) ANYWAY o/ DT o/ NPO Glad this happened. At first, I'll admit I opposed this treaty but after a couple of months dealing with the new government, I have to say that they won me over. Here's to a long fruitful relationship...... And epic LAN parties! lol Also, shout out to anyone who can remember the game these cheats go to: laimlame lapostal lamaxout "Pseudo" is because you, and other associated "alliances" have revolving-door membership policies with one another. I don't really recognize you as distinct entities. Having a distinct banner is irrelevant. You are part of the same entity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeroofTime55 Posted March 27, 2015 Report Share Posted March 27, 2015 Gotta catch 'em all! Generally not the best strategy for STDs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunterman1043 Posted March 27, 2015 Report Share Posted March 27, 2015 (edited) "Pseudo" is because you, and other associated "alliances" have revolving-door membership policies with one another. I don't really recognize you as distinct entities. Having a distinct banner is irrelevant. You are part of the same entity. Lolok well I'm glad if gives you enjoyment to bust our balls over a well established policy. I'll say this for the millionth time, dual membership has been a thing for a long time and is not new as you should know. At the end of the day DBDC doesn't tell us jack about who or who not we can have our LAN parties with, we can do that on our own, don't insult our intelligence. Furthermore, I don't need to convince closed minded individuals of that truth to make that a truth. It's the god-honest truth; ask them. Are you convinced? :o :( ;) Just FYI, we were here first, so technically DBDC is our satellite. lol Edited March 27, 2015 by Hunterman1043 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brucemania Posted March 27, 2015 Report Share Posted March 27, 2015 o/ To both of us :) .. . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crownguard Posted March 28, 2015 Report Share Posted March 28, 2015 If only we could think of a catchy name for a 3 way treaty that isn't a bloc, this sig could be useful Why does the law have to get in the way of a sexy 3-way as it is? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeroofTime55 Posted March 28, 2015 Report Share Posted March 28, 2015 Lolok well I'm glad if gives you enjoyment to bust our balls over a well established policy. I'll say this for the millionth time, dual membership has been a thing for a long time and is not new as you should know. At the end of the day DBDC doesn't tell us jack about who or who not we can have our LAN parties with, we can do that on our own, don't insult our intelligence. Furthermore, I don't need to convince closed minded individuals of that truth to make that a truth. It's the god-honest truth; ask them. Are you convinced? :o :( ;) Just FYI, we were here first, so technically DBDC is our satellite. lol 1) Sure, you are allowed to make your own policy. And you have made your own policy such that it effectively nullifies your existence as a distinct entity from DBDC. 2) Sure, dual memberships have been a thing forever. But when you have an alliance wide policy of "we are also members of DBDC, and Doom Squad, and everyone else in our little corner," when you constantly shuffle nations around to get involved in a war without "officially" implicating your own alliance, well, in my eyes, you've given up the right to be recognized as your own alliance. Because you aren't, at least not in full. "Pseudo-alliance" is, I believe, the best term to describe DT. 3) You don't know what the word "satellite" means. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starcraftmazter Posted March 28, 2015 Report Share Posted March 28, 2015 Why not just treaty DBDC instead of one of their satellite pseudo-alliances? Oh the buttmad 1) Sure, you are allowed to make your own policy. And you have made your own policy such that it effectively nullifies your existence as a distinct entity from DBDC. Your opinion only. 2) Sure, dual memberships have been a thing forever. But when you have an alliance wide policy of "we are also members of DBDC, and Doom Squad, and everyone else in our little corner," when you constantly shuffle nations around to get involved in a war without "officially" implicating your own alliance, well, in my eyes, you've given up the right to be recognized as your own alliance. Because you aren't, at least not in full. "Pseudo-alliance" is, I believe, the best term to describe DT. Nobody cares what you think, or to clarify it further, we and anyone we care about do not care what you think. The only thing null here is your comment. So enjoy being buttmad while we're having fun. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoshuaR Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 If only we could think of a catchy name for a 3 way treaty that isn't a bloc, this sig could be useful HOPEAPARTMENT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stewie Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 HOPEAPARTMENT Unjust Party Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeroofTime55 Posted March 30, 2015 Report Share Posted March 30, 2015 buttmad buttmad buttmad buttmad buttmad buttmad buttmad buttmad I can feel the projecting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.