Neo Uruk Posted January 14, 2014 Report Share Posted January 14, 2014 In a world of dumb people, you might be the dumbest.Reminder: You're terrible at spinning declarations of war as if you're regretful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweeeeet Ronny D Posted January 14, 2014 Report Share Posted January 14, 2014 In a world of dumb people, you might be the dumbest. hold on hold on. I got it! This is the dumbest argument anyone has been making fwiw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umar ibn Abd al-Aziz Posted January 14, 2014 Report Share Posted January 14, 2014 I'd find it hilarious if NPO brought the big nations out and the Doombirds that were in range swarmed whomever attacked them. Either way, good luck to GOD and VE. You're both good allies if nothing else. Why would DBDC help the NPO? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goldie Posted January 14, 2014 Author Report Share Posted January 14, 2014 Reminder: You're terrible at spinning declarations of war as if you're regretful. I'm not regretful. So what am I spinning? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stewie Posted January 14, 2014 Report Share Posted January 14, 2014 (edited) Why would DBDC help the NPO? Because DBDC are allied to only 1 alliance currently at war.Non GrataTheir other allies - DT & DoomSquad are not at war Edited January 14, 2014 by Stewie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted January 14, 2014 Report Share Posted January 14, 2014 I'm not regretful. So what am I spinning?Are you serious? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commander shepard Posted January 14, 2014 Report Share Posted January 14, 2014 Because DBDC are allied to only 1 alliance currently at war. Non Grata Their other allies - DT & DoomSquad are not at war Wouldn't make much sense as they let their ally NG get attacked by Umbrella and didn't really respond, why would they attack Umbrella or TOP nations because of the NPO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goldie Posted January 14, 2014 Author Report Share Posted January 14, 2014 Are you serious? I am serious. Is it too hard for you to understand that, or has someone not told you what to think on that matter yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted January 14, 2014 Report Share Posted January 14, 2014 I am serious. Is it too hard for you to understand that, or has someone not told you what to think on that matter yet?I've said it repeatedly - the man who rallied to cancel on GOD should not be the one making the "this gives me no pleasure" post. It could very well be true, but it is not the place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Zigur Posted January 14, 2014 Report Share Posted January 14, 2014 Neo Uruk you need to learn how to pick your fights. Do you realize how incredibly petty you look picking on the wording of a single DoW? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted January 14, 2014 Report Share Posted January 14, 2014 Neo Uruk you need to learn how to pick your fights. Do you realize how incredibly petty you look picking on the wording of a single DoW?and your side has harped on the wording of a single refusal of a ridiculous peace term, oh wow how petty! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goldie Posted January 14, 2014 Author Report Share Posted January 14, 2014 I've said it repeatedly - the man who rallied to cancel on GOD should not be the one making the "this gives me no pleasure" post. It could very well be true, but it is not the place. So you are saying that it was inappropriate for me to reflect my true opinion on the matter in the DoW? I disagree with you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted January 14, 2014 Report Share Posted January 14, 2014 So you are saying that it was inappropriate for me to reflect my true opinion on the matter in the DoW? I disagree with you.I'm just saying it looks like a lot of spin. The fact that your assistance wasn't exactly necessary is a bonus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stewie Posted January 14, 2014 Report Share Posted January 14, 2014 Wouldn't make much sense as they let their ally NG get attacked by Umbrella and didn't really respond, why would they attack Umbrella or TOP nations because of the NPO. They limited engaged Umb and TOP as they are former Umb/TOP nations from waht I can see Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Ilyani Posted January 15, 2014 Report Share Posted January 15, 2014 and your side has harped on the wording of a single refusal of a ridiculous peace term, oh wow how petty! That's totally not the same thing at all and you know it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goldie Posted January 15, 2014 Author Report Share Posted January 15, 2014 (edited) I'm just saying it looks like a lot of spin. The fact that your assistance wasn't exactly necessary is a bonus. Who would I be spinning to? Do I want to make GOD like me by saying it? Or their SF allies? No, I'm perfectly fine if they want to blame me for their problems and irrelevancy. Spin generally has a defined objective that is gained from twisting facts, and I can't really imagine someone thinking I'm trying to gain something by my personal statement leading off this thread. Edited January 15, 2014 by Goldie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hereno Posted January 15, 2014 Report Share Posted January 15, 2014 Except this isn't a war of survival, its a war with your coalition doing their best to shield NPO's upper tier. NPO is enacting the terms as we speak. It is just a continuation of the current state of affairs, minus the wars. You haven't posted anything even semi-intelligent in like two years. What happened? This is a world where alliances have paid hundreds of thousands of tech in reps but suddenly requiring nations that have been avoiding damage by staying in peace mode to remain in peace mode for a period after the war is some outrageous and insulting offer that no alliace would ever agree to? Give me an effing break. Karma was years ago. Get over it, nerd. I know it's hard for you to understand in Umbrella, since you had Brehon going to bat for you the entire war you lost, but when your alliance is surrounded on all sides by people offering you terms as harsh as are currently on the table, you're fighting a war of survival, and let's be honest, TOP doesn't *really* want peace, it's far better for them to see Polarsphere become useless for next war. Wow, Mogar had to be the one posting something real. You should all be ashamed of yourselves. In a world of dumb people, you might be the dumbest. This is worse than the pot calling the kettle black; it's like the pot calling the red barn black. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted January 15, 2014 Report Share Posted January 15, 2014 (edited) Who would I be spinning to? Do I want to make GOD like me by saying it? Or their SF allies? No, I'm perfectly fine if they want to blame me for their problems and irrelevancy. Spin generally has a defined objective that is gained from twisting facts, and I can't really imagine someone thinking I'm trying to gain something by my personal statement leading off this thread.I mean I guess, lots of people have motives that are hard to guess.e: nice edit btw, more elaboration is nice. I wouldn't exactly call most of the SF alliances "irrelevant" at this point altho your coalition is doing a nice job of throwing them into the fire. Edited January 15, 2014 by Neo Uruk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commander shepard Posted January 15, 2014 Report Share Posted January 15, 2014 They limited engaged Umb and TOP as they are former Umb/TOP nations from waht I can see So if they're not attacking the main threat to the NPO upper tier then it is safe to say nothing would change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goldie Posted January 15, 2014 Author Report Share Posted January 15, 2014 I mean I guess, lots of people have motives that are hard to guess. e: nice edit btw, more elaboration is nice. I wouldn't exactly call most of the SF alliances "irrelevant" at this point altho your coalition is doing a nice job of throwing them into the fire. GOD and R&R have only themselves to blame for their fire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goldie Posted January 15, 2014 Author Report Share Posted January 15, 2014 This is worse than the pot calling the kettle black; it's like the pot calling the red barn black. On a purely objective level, who would actually agree with your assessment of me? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hereno Posted January 15, 2014 Report Share Posted January 15, 2014 On a purely objective level, who would actually agree with your assessment of me? It would probably be easier to list people who wouldn't tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goldie Posted January 15, 2014 Author Report Share Posted January 15, 2014 It would probably be easier to list people who wouldn't tbh My point exactly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umar ibn Abd al-Aziz Posted January 15, 2014 Report Share Posted January 15, 2014 Because DBDC are allied to only 1 alliance currently at war. Non Grata Their other allies - DT & DoomSquad are not at war So just for argument's sake, as posited - say NPO's top tier came out. Methax, Cdr Bean and I hit them when they pop their heads up. DBDC attacks us on behalf of NG for NPO? Is that what you're saying? Do you really think that will happen? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hereno Posted January 15, 2014 Report Share Posted January 15, 2014 My point exactly. LOL my point exactly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts