Jens of the desert Posted November 16, 2011 Report Share Posted November 16, 2011 The whole point of an alliance proficient at war is how it conducts itself and organizes large groups of nations, not how one of them performs solo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the rebel Posted November 16, 2011 Report Share Posted November 16, 2011 [quote name='Jens of the desert' timestamp='1321462729' post='2845551'] The whole point of an alliance proficient at war is how it conducts itself and organizes large groups of nations, not how one of them performs solo. [/quote] Having several from alliances would prove a point because that would show whose more organized by alliance but on a lot smaller scale than total alliance warfare... But meh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kriekfreak Posted November 16, 2011 Report Share Posted November 16, 2011 [quote name='the rebel' timestamp='1321470541' post='2845584'] Having several from alliances would prove a point because that would show whose more organized by alliance but on a lot smaller scale than total alliance warfare... But meh. [/quote] Again it would prove nothing. MHA could send 5 of their best nations and still look competent for example. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hewhoisgod Posted November 16, 2011 Report Share Posted November 16, 2011 (edited) This would be more fun if people made teams of 3 instead. The teams wouldn't be based around alliances, any three nations that wanted to team up would be allowed to. Each team would face another team for one war cycle, at the end of which a winner would be determined by some set formula (ex. amount of damage done). The winning team would move on to the next round, and the losing team would be eliminated. The rounds would continue with a very short recovery period after each cycle until eventually one team is declared the winner. At that point, if there are prizes they would be awarded, but to be honest the bragging rights alone should suffice. The only problem with this is that there would need to be multiple brackets for different NS ranges, which could only happen if enough people were interested. Edited November 16, 2011 by hewhoisgod Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarriorConcept Posted November 16, 2011 Report Share Posted November 16, 2011 I wish I was in range of Drai Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ace of Aces Posted November 16, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 16, 2011 I like Hewhoisgods idea about having teams. I was going to make it like its everybody for themselves but they can develop alliances in the game to help win. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melancholy Culkin Posted November 17, 2011 Report Share Posted November 17, 2011 I'd stick to the CCC forums if I were you buddy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the rebel Posted November 17, 2011 Report Share Posted November 17, 2011 [quote name='kriekfreak' timestamp='1321472398' post='2845601'] Again it would prove nothing. MHA could send 5 of their best nations and still look competent for example.[/quote] Indeed that is why I said meh at the end . The only way it would work is pairing up alliances so that on paper they look equal and then let them duel it out 1v1 without any outside interference while the world eats popcorn. But since we live in a world where most alliances wouldn't fight an even war, we will never know who is better pound for pound. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ace of Aces Posted November 17, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 17, 2011 So one alliance just doesnt kill the other thats when NS range lines and war chest limits come in. To make sure one person just doesnt destroy the other people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyriakos Raanb Dorou Posted November 17, 2011 Report Share Posted November 17, 2011 As hinted before... I'm sure there may be some interest in a TE contest, with SE prizes. Just have everyone who enters put up $3mil/50tech, and then divide the total between the winning nation/team. Players in TE already do this amongst themselves, from time to time (with or without prizes)... there just hasn't been a big SE push for a contest of arms within TE. TE is a lot better for it, though (equal start, no worries about losses, very little political influence, etc). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baltus Posted November 17, 2011 Report Share Posted November 17, 2011 You're good at war if you have lots of tech and experience. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
potato Posted November 17, 2011 Report Share Posted November 17, 2011 [quote name='The Ace of Aces' timestamp='1321393359' post='2845189'] Have you ever wondered which alliance was really best at war? [/quote] No, it's MK. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lazaraus45 Posted November 17, 2011 Report Share Posted November 17, 2011 [quote name='potato' timestamp='1321549718' post='2845932'] No, it's MK. [/quote] TOP>MK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ardus Posted November 17, 2011 Report Share Posted November 17, 2011 [quote name='lazaraus45' timestamp='1321553980' post='2845946'] TOP>MK [/quote] You should ask them about their experiences with oyababy and then revise your post. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Centurius Posted November 17, 2011 Report Share Posted November 17, 2011 (edited) [quote name='Ardus' timestamp='1321555160' post='2845948'] You should ask them about their experiences with oyababy and then revise your post. [/quote] I'd prefer he didn't but yeah Ace you should probably stay with your alliance forumss. Edited November 17, 2011 by Centurius Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
potato Posted November 17, 2011 Report Share Posted November 17, 2011 [quote name='Ardus' timestamp='1321555160' post='2845948'] You should ask them about their experiences with oyababy and then revise your post. [/quote] Or just ask around who the Godliest Military (TM) is. Or just do some research as to who surrendered to who in the last TOP vs MK war. Or read the ever so perfectly representative of public opinion that are the Awards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vladimir Stukov II Posted November 18, 2011 Report Share Posted November 18, 2011 Only way MK will have a better military than TOP is when I join them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ace of Aces Posted November 18, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 18, 2011 I think TE might be fun nobody takes it seriously anyway... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.