
lazaraus45
Members-
Content Count
646 -
Joined
-
Last visited
About lazaraus45
-
Rank
Advanced Member
- Birthday 10/07/1991
Contact Methods
-
Website URL
http://
-
ICQ
0
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
Previous Fields
-
Nation Name
Asgarde
-
Alliance Name
NPL
-
Resource 1
Cattle
-
Resource 2
Spices
-
further clarifications since i'm overly meticulous, when it says battle strength calculations, does this mean an increase in the odds of winning or an increase in the damage done, is xp acquired for operations like gather intel and battle support?
-
Just to clarify on the generals, do you get one general per branch for a total of four? or is it just one general in total with the branch determining his benefits?
-
Terrorism in the states
lazaraus45 commented on MrChaos's blog entry in The world according to a public servant
I keep seeing FB posts regarding this, especially questioning how we do these things to each other? and stating how the people responsible for such inhumane acts deserve the worsts of punishments, The answer strikes me as painfully obvious, so many more prayers seem aimed at punishing those responsible than for wellbeing of the victims, /rant -
Get back on paint and make a new one altogether
-
From: The Predictable Unpredictable Treaty Name [Insert Here]
lazaraus45 commented on OsRavan's blog entry in OsRavan's Blog
Would you really rather people not post mindless PR? if we kept our posts to meaningful fact filled posts these boards would be dead -
The single most important aspect of recruiting
lazaraus45 commented on TheEraser's blog entry in Elborrador's chalk board
To be clear, when you say this do you mean sending out a mass stock message PM as well as a unique one or taking the extra time to send unique messages to a large amount of nations? In the case of the former, i think the extra message would probably detract from the "OMG a message that isn't spam" effect of sending a unique message, plus if they read the spam one first they probably wouldn't bother reading the unique one. In the case of the latter, that is what i meant but there are drawbacks a lot of recruiters with restrictions on the time they can be at the computer wouldn't manage, and even for those without, they'd be falling behind when it comes to multiple nations appearing at once (as they tend to do ), the time between a nation being created and them receiving a message would get longer as you got further through them so it's often more effective to miss a few out to catch up -
The single most important aspect of recruiting
lazaraus45 commented on TheEraser's blog entry in Elborrador's chalk board
Pretty much what Tidy Bowl Man said. you're better off going for the individual than mass PM'ing because it's hard to get a nation interested in any alliance with a standard message, getting a nation to become part of your alliance and getting a nation to join your AA are two very different things. -
horrible stuff
-
From: I dont understand why I got banned.
lazaraus45 commented on Soldier's blog entry in Soldier's Blog
I'm so envious of mods, i bet before getting rid of each one of these types of topics they copy it somewhere only they can see as part of a huge archive of hilarious rules violators -
Please Invicta, don't betray Legion
lazaraus45 commented on Joe Stupid's blog entry in A Stupid opinion
We did some research on Ragnarok in TE and i can tell that you that roughly half of the test group didn't know to do more than fire CM's, a large portion went a full round of attacks and then gave up, and a lot of others just whined a lot. And that's from the members who were active enough to sign up to their TE alliance tl;dr DO EEEEET -
You suck!!
-
I get stopped at 25...and yet they get 20000 :(
lazaraus45 commented on King Wally's blog entry in Wally World
There was at least one stolen in the 90's, it hasn't however been fired yet as i still haven't got KW's address -
How exactly does interaction with other players work in minecraft?