hewhoisgod

We have one slot open, as a long-time member dropped out. If you're interested in taking his place, change your resources to coal and oil and pm or offer me a trade in-game. http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=271588

I'd rather read this than a bunch of "Here is our new government!" threads. o/ VODKA!

This would be more fun if people made teams of 3 instead. The teams wouldn't be based around alliances, any three nations that wanted to team up would be allowed to. Each team would face another team for one war cycle, at the end of which a winner would be determined by some set formula (ex. amount of damage done). The winning team would move on to the next round, and the losing team would be eliminated. The rounds would continue with a very short recovery period after each cycle until eventually one team is declared the winner. At that point, if there are prizes they would be awarded, but to be honest the bragging rights alone should suffice. The only problem with this is that there would need to be multiple brackets for different NS ranges, which could only happen if enough people were interested.

I've always preferred the Slavic pronunciation Graemlynes myself

[quote name='LittleRena' timestamp='1320646599' post='2840938'] Nice attempt to try to twist words but as I recall, those losses where against a larger coalition totalling more than NPO, with the exception of the FAN-1V war which ended around the time of Karma war. Point is, Legion are much bigger than Tetris and NSO, although there was a point in the war where the coalition of alliances techinically had more strength but it wasn't fully used, irrelevent though. To say Tetris failed in some way because they lost to a larger alliance is silly. [/quote] Tetris (and NSO) failed when they acted like asshats to Legion, both on irc and the owf. They then proceeded to get curbstomped to the extent that they needed their allies to intervene. Despite the intervention, Legion was poised on the brink of victory, and they needed MK and VE to step in and essentially order Legion to accept white peace. THAT...is a fail.

Congrats Legion on your victory and for successfully blue-balling NSO, MK, and VE from the global war they were working oh-so-hard for. My respect for Legion? Sky-rocketed My respect for those others? Plummeted

Great, now we have to spend the next year listening to NSO and Legion both talk about how they "would've" won if MK and VE hadn't stepped in. Good job.

Let the SUN shine bright! Onward to victory! o/ SUN!

[quote name='The Big Bad' timestamp='1318191917' post='2821665'] No doubt your aid will be enjoyed by Legion as they take it from the hapless people you are funding and use it against NSO who is the only alliance giving them a fight. So in the end your funding the embarrassment of your allies, the death of IAA and Legions war against NSO. I guess your right your getting one hell of a bang for your buck. [/quote] This. Times 100.

[quote name='Methrage' timestamp='1318037720' post='2820331'] What about those who aren't allied to Legion, but sympathize with Legion's situation and feel like sending them some aid, would you encourage them to do the same as well? [/quote] "Legion are currently at war with the NSO and various other alliances. I would ask that you cancel your aid offer to their member. Thanks! Varianz, Sith Lord" Does that answer your question?

So you have 5 government spots, and 5 members. Would it be correct to assume that your mysterious "Big Brother" is the only guy not specifically named in your charter? Also good luck, congratz, etc. etc. etc.

Be Careful What You Wish For, UPN [size="1"]TO ARMS[/size]* *[size="1"]arms not actually included[/size] Seriously though, declare or don't, but stop pretending you're tough. A call-out thread doesn't mean a thing unless you have the cahonies to back it up. (and i don't think you do)

Your right to exist is equal to or less than my right to destroy you!

Nice to see this! Neb-X is a good group of people. Zeon is as well. Congratz on your upgrade. o/ Nebula-X o/ Zeon

It's about time this finally came through! o/ Zeon! SIEG ZEON

Well done. I came here hoping to do another 6mill/200 with you, but instead you're already buying. I wish I would've done stuff like this when I first created.

my eyes...

In a few months I'll be moving back into a college dorm. My roommate also plays cybernations. Is there anything we can do to ensure that we don't get flagged for cheating or multis? My nation - http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=271588 Friends nation - http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=429097

Anyone who wants to form their own opinion of us, instead of listening to the somewhat biased pmoses, feel free to stop by our channel at #SUN. We'd be glad to say hello!

We here in SUN are proud to announce that we have upgraded our existing ODP with our friends over in Tetris, to an MDoAP. Here's to a great group of allies! o/Tetris! o/SUN! The SUN Still Shines on Tetris MDoAP Article I - Peace State of Unified Nations (SUN) and Tetris (Tetris) agree to remain respectful and polite to each other in all channels of communication, public or private. They also resolve to seek diplomatic means to any possible conflicts they may have. Both alliances should look out for each others well-being. As a consequence of their mutual friendship, both parties agree not to attack each other for any reason. In the event of a treaty conflict that would draw the two into war with each other, this article will take precedence. Article II - Intelligence Should either signatory obtain evidence that the threat of the other alliance's security is at risk, they should inform the alliance as soon as possible through appropriate channels. Article III - Aid If one of the signatories of this treaty finds that they need military or financial aid, they are allowed to ask the other signatory for aid. The other signatory is encouraged to take send aid to the requesting alliance, but this is not required. Article IV - Mutual Defense If either signatory comes under attack from a third party, the second alliance will defend it's ally. Article V - Optional Aggression If either signatory decides to attack a third party, the second alliance has the option of declaring alongside their ally. Article VI – Cancellation Should either signatory wish to cancel this agreement, they are to give 24 hours' notice to the other party with reasons through private channels. This treaty will remain in effect throughout that time period. For Tetris, Pollard, Game Developer Hereno, Programmer of Foreign Affairs Ali5541, Programmer of Internal Affairs USMC123, Programmer of Game Patent Sam Morgan, Programmer of Line Completion AnecdotalRabbit, Game Councilor Granat, Game Councilor Rhaemyr, Game Councilor For SUN, King James II, Emperor KillerCruiser, Prime Minister hewhoisgod, Minister of Foreign Affairs swatch0, Minister of War xYnOhTnAx, Minister of the Interior Rotthelmshausen, Minister of Recruitment SunofGod, Minister of Economics

Did you really just bring this to the OWF? I've seen cries for attention before but this is just pathetic. EDIT: also just for the record SUN has no beef with TORN, and I fail to see how we've been "slinging mud at them". and if you pick a fight with someone who has nukes, don't be surprised when you get nuked.

Call me crazy but If I give you a choice between giving me money or getting your ass kicked, I imagine that whatever choice you made you would complain afterwards. But hey, treat all complaints as the complainers fault, right?

[quote name='TheListener' timestamp='1306187720' post='2717113'] It's rather intelligent for someone to publicly complain about something they agreed to. To each his own though. [/quote] Agreed to unwillingly...really this should seem rather obvious.

[quote name='Rayvon' timestamp='1306038109' post='2716421'] Anymore fair than having to continue to read that statement? Having been there with X through this, I would have gone for reps as well .. Of course, I'm an !@#$%^& when it comes to my AA being attacked - under any circumstance ..... But hey [/quote] You appear to not have noticed my sig, so here's the link to see the full sized image. I feel this picture fully elucidates my opinion towards your comment. http://tinyurl.com/3jr68wn

The reason we PZI'ed el_barto is irrelevant to this discussion. You accepted a nation that was at war with us. The reason we were at war doesn't matter. This is a laughable offense on your part. They you somehow try to say that this was an attack on exodus and that we owe YOU reps? This only serves to demonstrate how pathetic Exodus really is.