Jump to content

erikz

Members
  • Posts

    2,164
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Blog Comments posted by erikz

  1. An alliance that refuses a surrender term, leading to the war being continued, is not being forced to disband by any definition, unless the surrender term they refuse is impossible or near-impossible to achieve.

    As far as I've heard that's not the case here: Xiph ultimate goal, stemming from his ulterior motives, is the disbandment of UPN.

    In my eyes this is deplorable and should be made punishable by admin. Making the game impossible to play for others, forcing rerolls to ZI etc, is just the poorest of forms.

  2. I mean, you obviously hate what GOD is doing in this war. We are so terrible because we have given out white peace to our only targets this war. GATO received white peace with no clause dealing with re-entry after about 1-2 weeks of war, and Flying Hellfish United rexeived white peace with a no re-entry clause.

    We are so immoral compared to your view of CN, it's just disgusting.

    Lol, twist it anyway you want, you know as well as I do that there is no reasoning with Xiph about giving UPN white peace.

    The GATO and FHU peace agreements are normal yes, but they do not in any way cancel out what Xiph is trying to pull on UPN.

  3. A term is a term and being someone who is against terms, you should also be against no re-entry clauses.

    Its clear we differ in opinion here, I think a no re-entry clause is something that secures your allies and yourselves, because it prevents an alliance from hopping in and out of war when it suits them. The alliance which signs the clause isn't hurt in any way (economically, military or any other way.

    Anyways, I was writing this blog because someone is trying to play some sort of evil overlord-admin here, which is very wrong.

  4. Expecting an alliance to disband in order to get peace is both wrong and counter-productive. Tell your ally "thanks" but if they are really your ally they should respect your wishes NOT to raise the bar for a peace agreement with terms that you don't want. Seems to me an ally should respect that as opposed to demanding MORE than what you want.

    The problem is they are not my ally. Furthermore, whats the point of us signing a peace agreement if it still means the other party will be forced into disbanding?

    It's very simple. Walk away and leave them on the battlefield. If they want to disband the other alliance so badly, let them do it on their own.

    This would mean we're helping the disbandment happen. Once we peace out, we have no say in the situation anymore....

×
×
  • Create New...