Yeah I'm not going to dance around the issue. If there's something that annoys me that I see way too much of on the sides of wars which are losing, guess I'd know a lot then eh?, turtling seems to be a common tactic. Now I'm not going to sit here and wag my finger at all those that do it, my finger would get tired, but what is truly the point of turtling? To save your infrastructure? If you're nothing more than a person who lobs nukes and cruise missiles because you're too afraid to spend money and get destroyed in hope that you destroy the other nation as much as you can there really is no point of you fighting.
I've been in nuclear wars before, one where I didn't even have nukes, and I bought soldiers and self-anarchied just to win GA's. There is nothing shameful in fighting back, nor should you expect mercy if you don't. It appears fighting back is not even a valid "tactic" these days. Do whatever you can to harm your opponents. If their objective is to see you destroyed the whole idea of living to fight another day will only see them sent off happily without being even somewhat harmed. Even if the damage you take compared to them is 2 to 1 or worse it's worth it to cause damage why else are you there?
If our idea of the war was to get dragged down with a fight, I don't think turtling will do it. Don't rely on living to fight another day, do all you can until you can't do anymore. There is nothing worse than giving up on a war no matter how helpless it is. While some worse off than you are trying all they can to put up a fight and you give up it's just sad. You've lost before you can even bother to fire a shot.
You have 122 new messages in your inbox.
Did not read.