Jump to content

Orville Reginbacher

Members
  • Posts

    355
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Orville Reginbacher

  1. I still can't believe how quickly we jumped back into sanction status.
  2. Is it technically a grave dig if you bump an alliance thread? Also, first in a while. Polaris is growing very well after the last war and is looking for a great remainder of 2015. Come be a part of it!
  3. I suppose this was the obvious change coming out of the last war. I wish you all the best. On another related note: Nice work, Jayson Blair, I mean Margrave.
  4. You understand my entire post was in jest, right? I was clearly mirroring the #NotAllMen hashtag from similarly sounding feminist movements in my nation of Lawyeria, of which I thought everyone had heard. You take me waaaay too seriously. #50ShadesOfBuscemi #IdontWantToLiveOnThisPlanetAnymore. Sorry, see above for my reasoning.
  5. Just in case someone lumps NpO in with this hate on NPO, I'd like to say that some new orders are different. My new order, Polar, helps people out now, really doesn't have the same hegemonic imperial focus as these other new orders. #NotAllNewOrders
  6. Like in the thread about the "mcxa DoW" where Fox Fire referred to raping as a fun, acceptable activity?
  7. 05 Feb 2015 - 09:35 AM. Apparently you and I have totally different ideas of what is friendly or fun. Raping may be on your list of fun or friendly activities, I read through mine again and cannot find it anywhere.
  8. So who is going to do the raping? And since when was that ever in any alliance of CN an acceptable thing to state, even in jest in response to a joke/rogue declare from a two nation alliance? (Ooc): seriously, cut that crap out.
  9. I know, I was just trying to help you put the last nail in the coffin of this \m/ discussion. I think it worked.
  10. Yeah, \m/ is up there in greatness with other great things such as Blockbuster, Circuit City, the Walkman, and the actual floppy disc. Doch is just oblivious to its greatness, probably because he hasn't been reminded of \m/'s greatness for many years.
  11. Constant state of fear...I mean stability. Can we call ourselves the underlords?
  12. Good job to our allies on getting good peace. Well fought.
  13. I've been telling some folks for a while that this is the only sensible response to a DBDC raid. This way they get nothing from you, and when you nuke them, they lose stuff, so it will always result in a net loss for them, larger probably than if you fought back.
  14. I've contributed a decent percentage of the NpO attack damage on ODN. Happy about that.
  15. It's been far too long since the last bump. It is holiday time, after all.
  16. You are trying way too hard to get someone to make mention of the BBC (big black coal) in your mouth. There, I did it.
  17. I would like a Christmas Truce to whomever is fighting me. Thanks!
  18. Starfox is right, Lord Hitchcock is terrible at this: By your and Zog's logic, DBDC had already declared an all out war on us when they raided us, right? Yeah, we honor treaty obligations, big whoop, wanna fight about it? Let's assume for a second that we had to chose between backing our allies (which we are doing 100% right now) and the tech blockade, like they are mutually exclusive. Do you honestly think we would damn our allies? That's really ignorant. Yeah, Tywin never said Polar is winning. He said enemy morale is low, which may or may not be true, I'm not a fly on your walls. Tell me more about how you like to make stuff up that is never said and act like it was.
  19. Realistically I do not know, as I only fight wars with individual nations, and none in Atlas. I can safely say that, on average, the worst "Alliance" that I have fought is either TLR or R&R, but I wouldn't dare feel safe enough in assessing an entire alliance's skill on my 2 wars with each, they probably aren't representative. This is why some of these awards are just dumb, and the political ones in the group should not make nominations for some of these awards.
  20. o/ Fark. Time for some OJ with breakfast.
  21. I would disagree--the OP had no distinction in characteristics, nor was one implied other than the age of the alliance to set it apart from the other alliances. You are adding words and criteria that were not there to the OP. I suppose one could use their own subjective criteria, in which case you would be right. However, I will not indulge that idea, because that would mean all these awards are meaningless, and I simply refuse to believe these awards have no meaning...:-P
×
×
  • Create New...