Jump to content

WarriorConcept

Members
  • Posts

    5,803
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by WarriorConcept

  1. Clementines are great. Clementine Defense Network imo
  2. You guys really do need ochocinco. I'm not even kidding, his plans for GGA were great.
  3. [quote name='Mr Damsky' date='24 February 2010 - 07:54 PM' timestamp='1267059502' post='2202306'] I was referring to your raid on the [b]thirty[/b] man alliance of FoA that helped kick start this entire war. [/quote] FoA seems fine.
  4. [quote name='AirMe' date='24 February 2010 - 04:22 PM' timestamp='1267046776' post='2201993'] Pitting friends against ex-friends is what TOP has done. I really don't see how that is MK's doing? [/quote] It's MK's fault for being attacked and asking for help from its allies obviously.
  5. [quote name='The Big Bad' date='24 February 2010 - 05:30 AM' timestamp='1267007628' post='2201221'] You know VE only declares once your out gunned and out numbered. Its what they do. And lets be honest if you were on the other side would you want rely on them for anything important? VE the new GGA. [/quote] You're an idiot. Good luck and have fun VE, TOOL are good folk.
  6. [quote name='Anthony' date='24 February 2010 - 07:17 PM' timestamp='1267057288' post='2202257'] Eh...no. [/quote] So, you guys are willing to surrender?
  7. [quote name='Bob Janova' date='24 February 2010 - 04:31 PM' timestamp='1267047313' post='2202012'] If you will really 'never surrender' then you are driving your own alliance into the ground, and I have more sympathy for Polar. You're doing the victim complex thing that TPF made their own in Karma, but it sounds like you're not doing it for anyone, you'll keep doing it forever. Staying in the war for IRON is admirable, although you're not really much help to them any more, but at some point, if you want to see infra in your future, you're going to have to surrender. [/quote] Pretty much this. NSO will have to surrender at the conclusion of this war and they're staying in for nothing they'll receive at the end.
  8. Legion had their chance for white peace and they messed it up. Glad to see the war dying down.
  9. [quote name='Mr Damsky' date='19 February 2010 - 12:16 AM' timestamp='1266556585' post='2191564'] Yes I did phrase that quite poorly. Let me try again: For some reason I don't see lenient terms in the future, there we go. [/quote] Guess we'll see then. I don't think lenient terms should be given personally. More of a middle-ground between lenient and harsh, moderate? Regardless it's not up to me to decide and it'll be up to TOP and IRON to decide what they consider are fair terms before accepting any.
  10. [quote name='Mr Damsky' date='19 February 2010 - 12:10 AM' timestamp='1266556255' post='2191550'] Clever. We have yet to see the terms for TOP and IRON. For some reason I don't see the words "White Peace" in their future. [/quote] Main perpetrators of an unprovoked war should never get off with white peace, only an idiot would let them off with white peace.
  11. That's not white peace you guys are going down the same path as those before you.
  12. [quote name='Ivan Moldavi' date='16 February 2010 - 01:05 PM' timestamp='1266343512' post='2185786'] Where do you find this chart? [/quote] Under the "charts" tab when viewing your nation.
  13. [quote name='Haflinger' date='16 February 2010 - 12:56 PM' timestamp='1266342971' post='2185773'] I'm no expert on TOP, but some things are incredibly obvious unless you've got your head buried in sand. [/quote] Nice cop out.
  14. [quote name='Zeta Defender' date='16 February 2010 - 02:42 AM' timestamp='1266306121' post='2185218'] All of them except for GOD. [/quote] Edit: Thanks to the clarification by bakamatai
  15. [quote name='Zeta Defender' date='16 February 2010 - 02:36 AM' timestamp='1266305799' post='2185202'] Is WarriorConcept too stupid to read? [/quote] Clarified: Which alliances that still had reps due to them suspended said reps?
  16. [quote name='Jesse End' date='16 February 2010 - 02:34 AM' timestamp='1266305696' post='2185198'] All with the exception of GOD. [/quote] So which alliances actually had reps due to them still from NPO? Oh don't tell me they're all in FOK's situation now and you're using this number of 14/15 agreeing to suspend reps when most of them don't have any reps due to them as a blatant PR slam attempt
  17. [quote name='Fireandthepassion' date='16 February 2010 - 02:31 AM' timestamp='1266305514' post='2185190'] You do realize you just defeated your argument and validated everything WC has been saying about those not having reps have nothing to suspend right? It also kind of validates Xiphosis' (Legion NoFISH maybe) about how this is a PR attempt to make GOD look bad by saying 14/15 have agreed to suspended parts of the surrender when obligations of payments had ended. edit: for GRAMMAR! [/quote] This is a blatant PR attempt to make GOD look bad, I don't think they'd deny it at all to be fair
  18. [quote name='Fireandthepassion' date='16 February 2010 - 02:29 AM' timestamp='1266305353' post='2185180'] Except it has a valid casus belli for war so it's nothing like a tech raid! [/quote] Like I said, I look forward to seeing polaris recognizing a state of war with pacifica. [quote name='Jesse End' date='16 February 2010 - 02:29 AM' timestamp='1266305366' post='2185181'] If you actually read this thread, you must have a really short memory. Everyone that we owe reps to, except for GOD, suspended their reps. [/quote] Well yeah, I meant specifically which alliances. I don't believe that's actually mentioned here at all.
×
×
  • Create New...