Jump to content

Artigo

Members
  • Posts

    881
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Artigo

  1. [quote name='HisK Owns You' timestamp='1338084401' post='2973009'] Yes, what are you going to do about it? [/quote] Laugh at your AA some more I already hit you !@#$* once why don't you come at me?
  2. [quote name='Melancholy Culkin' timestamp='1338023006' post='2972684'] MK took his defensive slots and he accepted their peace offers. [/quote] Are you accusing MK of supporting a rouge?
  3. Deinos obviously lifts. These tactics are way over our heads.
  4. [quote name='Jaiar' timestamp='1337115125' post='2967802'] Dude, building a war chest means we are preparing for war and scheming against someone. Stop building that war chest now. We don't want anyone to be on to our secret plans. [/quote] Might as well spend it won't save you brahs
  5. Any announcement with Argent in it is a good one
  6. [quote name='Samus' timestamp='1337256086' post='2968596'] Lets drop the treaty and attack them now! [/quote] Waiting on you big man
  7. End of an era for sure. Sad to see this happen, but happy that you chose to carry on the legacy with us.
  8. Just one more good rolling and you're off the hook
  9. [quote name='Jacapo Saladin' timestamp='1336186994' post='2963601'] Terrible theme [size="1"]Artigo[/size] [/quote] I like where this is going
  10. [quote name='Xiphosis' timestamp='1336194143' post='2963766'] It refers to how I feel applauding this and is not a commentary on IRON or NPO. Alternatively, this works, but I've used it too often: [img]http://demonsdesire.org/F-GOD/convinced.gif[/img] [/quote] [img]http://i39.tinypic.com/2jb8sig.jpg[/img] IRON + NPO = <3
  11. Oly is a great bunch and DR is an even greater one. Watch out brahs DR has been hitting the gym they're starting to look like the big kid on the bloc. Sick announcement, congrats on this gentlemen.
  12. [quote name='Rotavele' timestamp='1335230844' post='2958157'] Speaking of retarded alliances, one who supports massive land purchases that shrinks warchests and tech deals should be upon that list. Theres no need to argue with a guy who purchases 50K land in order to become better at war and retain his pixels. His opinions of people are unnoted and not really acknowledged. [/quote] Strong post
  13. [quote name='Omniscient1' timestamp='1335502687' post='2960012'] At least someone got it. [/quote] Jakes on you !@#$ we all got it
  14. [quote name='King Louis the II' timestamp='1335472636' post='2959828'] [s] You deflected again. There is no relevance whether was smart or not.[/s] At the end of the day Blocs are more solid than individual treaties period. This doesn't mean that PB will "change directions or move to other sphere" or distance herself from NG. Again that's not the point. ADDED: (OOC)oops I am multitasking and read it too fast (/OOC). But you are still going far away from the subject... The point is much simpler, Be in PB and have MDoAPs with individual members are very different things. [/quote] The truth is blocs are only as solid as the amount of lifting individual alliances do. A thick, solid, tight alliance such as NG makes all of our treaties as aesthetic as possible. So if you want to get down to the core of the argument an alliance like yours has shown time and time again that it prefers to do none of the heavy lifting (in war).
  15. [quote name='King Louis the II' timestamp='1335470520' post='2959813'] Your comment make no sense and don't add anything to the discussion. The discussion was whether the individual treaties hold by NG would basically assure PB on NG side despite having left the bloc. The history tells that individual treaties don't mean anything if they are not in line with Bloc decisions. Ask ODN and Umbrella. [/quote] Hitting Fark wasn't a bloc decision either. So can you see where I'm going with this
  16. [quote name='King Louis the II' timestamp='1335459967' post='2959769'] Last war made pretty clear how easy people can ignore a treaty. Specially when blocs are involved. [/quote] Don't worry you won't be so lucky next time
  17. [quote name='Incitatus' timestamp='1335381304' post='2959078'] #9 doesn't do it for ya, eh? [/quote] Good look bro
  18. Good luck to our friends, this was a tough decision.
  19. [quote name='Grendel' timestamp='1334928265' post='2956132'] Just curious what do you consider a micro-alliance? [/quote] Small numbers and no treaties
  20. Strong announcement that will surely teach those raiding scum
  21. [quote name='Courland' timestamp='1334731327' post='2955236'] Yes, but anyway, my apologies for all two of my threads. Especially the joke one making fun of Sword Alliance. Alliance Announcements would have been much better off with another 30 days of MDoB* treaties. [/quote] Two threads too many. All micros should condense their !@#$ announcements to one thread. Like an official ***My alliance has something to announce, but were too irrelevant to warrant it's own thread*** thread Were going to slowly ground into dust and the world will forget about you in a few months, that's how these things go brah
  22. [quote name='Courland' timestamp='1334655858' post='2954774'] FYP for accuracy. [/quote] Good one brah It's not that GOONS couldn't finish this war on their own, it's just that we're all sick of seeing ten daily announcements about this. OP is a fine example.
×
×
  • Create New...