Jump to content

R3nowned

Members
  • Posts

    1,520
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by R3nowned

  1. One of the fastest growing micro alliances! Join us today!
  2. Nice pairing I guess this isn't that surprising
  3. Uh huh... If we feel the desire to do a tech deal with them (one who isn't at war), will that be considered an act of war on the GOONS? Out of curiosity.
  4. Ooo welcome back! Does this mean we can reactivate our treaty? Edit: Yeah, it would be a bad idea to raid OXIII
  5. Lol I like how those alliances made their own fun.
  6. Old face comes back... Hope you enjoy your stay
  7. The better path would've been to just disband. Seriously, if you can't read, understand and uphold a treaty, you're not suited leading an alliance.
  8. [quote name='Zoomzoomzoom' timestamp='1311230175' post='2760367'] Make it a !@#$@#$ fireworks show people. [/quote] I you zoomie, took the words right out of my mouth
  9. [quote name='Schattenmann' timestamp='1311099651' post='2759359'] Member count is the only metric of success. [/quote] No, but it is certainly an important one. If an alliance cannot get the ball rolling in acquiring members, it will inevitably fail. Recruitment is highly important to an alliance's survival. The theme (and name) of this alliance almost ensures that any one not living in the area will not join. That is a huge hindrance to an alliance's growth and prosperity. I know that CN is based in Texas, but most if its players certainly aren't. Of course, if they play to their strengths, they will become a successful alliance. It will, however, take even more work than getting an alliance like mine rolling, as it caters only to a small target audience.
  10. September. We're long overdue for another war considering the tensions on the OWF starting to boil up. That's not to mention the few close calls we've had already.
  11. This is a terrible idea for an alliance theme, as it is alienating a large portion of potential recruits. Good luck with getting this off the ground, but considering your rather specific theme, I doubt many people would join.
  12. [quote name='Green Lantern' timestamp='1310877741' post='2757609'] Couple reasons. 1) The oldest Justice League AA (The Justice League) is somewhat hard to get a hold of, not sure if they have any treaties or DoE or anything. 2) We DoE'd slightly before the Justice League of Armenia and they seem like nice enough folks. So I don't think we or they should have to fold or merge before getting a chance to grow and prosper. So, as far as any alliance announcements go, it's just two alliances that you're going to have to distinguish between, and one has "Armenia" in their name. A bit of a pain I know, but many alliances are fairly indistinguishable from one another. [/quote] There was a time when an alliance DoE'd with a similar name to yours, you'd roll them for stealing your name. That was a good practise, and kept alliance names original (kind of). We need to bring that practise back.
  13. [quote name='Mr flubb' timestamp='1310875899' post='2757591'] Why cant we just have 1 justice league? i dont need to be confused on which one is which, and its terribly annoying [/quote] This. Why can't the 3 of you battle it out for ownership of the Justice league AA and all similar AAs
  14. You'd be very welcome in Paragon. We are a small alliance, but with a good aid and trade network to support our smaller members. Our forums are at: http://www.cn-paragon.net
  15. Thoughts on a possible future white unity bloc?
  16. Huh... funny, I thought you guys disbanded.
  17. No idea what happened. Sounds like I missed out on some lulzy drama Good luck to both parties.
  18. Entertaining read Looking forward to the next edition.
×
×
  • Create New...