William Blake

[quote name='Tygaland' timestamp='1317685475' post='2814985'] That is, generally, not how cowards operate. [/quote] Not much else to say about that. You nailed it. edit: Glad you stood up for yourselves, Legion. Tetris is a poor man's OV, at best (which is saying something since OV was a !@#$ alliance).

[quote name='zachart' timestamp='1317606066' post='2814339'] IKR i was gonna release my calendars too [/quote] !@#$, start the war back up so we can get the calenders.

[quote name='Jaiar' timestamp='1317604159' post='2814308'] Sure, NG won on the battlefield, [b]but got what UPN offered them[/b]. It cost UPN, but they win some points here; they stood up for themselves. It's better than not taking the battlefield and just bending over and giving an alliance $15mil/250tech. [/quote] I'm gonna go out on a limb and say UPN got what we offered (since Arexes already said he made the reps 6mil as a joke). But it's not really a big deal.

ooo, sucks for the guy I just nuked a few minutes ago.

[quote name='R3nowned' timestamp='1317559760' post='2813812'] Say what? I don't really understand this announcement. Is it an "up yours" to GOD and co.? Or what? :S [/quote] Sure seems like it.

[quote name='Robster83' timestamp='1317468533' post='2813296'] As for this whole "ploy" discussion, it isn't a coherent argument, considering that technically UPN started this fiasco ( i.e if the raid didn't take place, we wouldn't be here.) So to say that this was some sort of ploy to get to Polaris would be silly. [/quote] So what you're saying is...UPN was in on the ploy to roll Polar!!! You monsters!

Certainly the most rational course of action.

Congrats, the rest of CN.

Another retarded thread from Tetris, though how could I expect anything different.

[quote name='Sigrun Vapneir' timestamp='1316954562' post='2808095'] Eh, shocked you couldnt come up with anything better than this actually. He didnt actually say anything about it being a new idea. You are just reading that in because it is lolegion. [img]http://img706.imageshack.us/img706/7940/6e239h.jpg[/img] See? Nothing about it being a new idea. Just a bolded stickied reminder/plea that the MoFA cant do this alone and base members need to help out. There are good reasons to criticise Legion. This aint one of em. [/quote] Agreed on all of this. If you are gonna spy on an alliance's forum and post screen shots at least try to get something that wouldn't be found on every other forum in the game. These were retarded.

[quote name='Pollard' timestamp='1316555899' post='2804702'] Good riddance. [/quote] Out of curiosity, what makes you say this? Personally, I've never heard of them, just wondering if I missed some interesting drama.

[quote name='cookavich' timestamp='1316495221' post='2804333'] I'm pretty sure you're doing it wrong. [/quote] Here's hoping it goes better this time, eh, Cookie.

Nice to see this announced.

Good luck to the new Tri. Thanks for all the hard work, Arexes.

[quote name='Ironfist' timestamp='1315660409' post='2798020'] NG, did you just tag in for GOONS? I haven't heard from those guys in awhile and you're all doing the same stuff on the OWF as them. Conspiracy? [/quote] Can you clarify this? I'm missing how defending your alliance against rogues and expecting alliances whose nations aid said rogues while in a time of war to pay reparations is something to be ashamed of. Or was that one of the legacies of the ebil GOONS 1.0?

[quote name='MrHavok' timestamp='1315622851' post='2797741'] Just curious what gives you the right to dictate who nations can and can't do tech deals with? Straight up aid I can see, however if he is fulfilling his end of the bargain in a tech deal what gives you this right? In addition if someone does a deal with him and they are nations that don't check the OWF why is it the responsibility for every alliance to spread your edict on this subject or else suffer your wrath or your extortion demands of reps? This is your mess I suggest cleaning it up yourself It's a very slippery slope and a dangerous area when alliances can dictate who tech deals are done with [/quote] You realize considering aiding nations at war to be itself an act of war is not a new phenomenon, right? I know it's always been around for the 4 years I've been playing. Not sure what you're complaint is.

The list of truly respectable players of this game shrinks again. Take it easy.

Congrats.

[quote name='TypoNinja' timestamp='1314479417' post='2789497'] I think its pointless for different reasons, impeachment proceedings are never as neat and tidy as everybody seems to expect them to be, I've seen it happen several times both here and in other places. If it ever actually comes down to the vote you are already up a creek without a paddle. [/quote] I think that's kind of the point. I don't think Random was particularly happy with the way they had to go about couping Sponge back in the day, hence the change. The alliance would probably still be in bad shape, but it would at least help stop the bleeding. Might have also been helpful during BiPolar, but who knows. Good luck moving forward, Polar.

Congrats, R3. Glad you're still hanging in there.

[quote name='Lanore' timestamp='1311370343' post='2761502'] So I have been gone for a while now. When did the main power struggle/drama factory become Polar/TOP? Like, everything I see seems to be about them now o.o . [/quote] Well over a year ago, I think.

[quote name='chefjoe' timestamp='1311361422' post='2761413'] When they started dating you all [/quote] Yeah, that's kinda what I figured. That or they did something that annoyed MK.

Sorry, I haven't been active for the last few months, when did Fark become so disliked?

Congrats, TGE. I made it to the end of the thread and you're still an alliance! You're on the right path now.

So, reading the last couple pages, is this settled up yet?