Sephiroth Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 Congrats on making a good decision here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Catalyst Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 Blaze of Glory > Blaze of fail Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnCapistan Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 This was a good move, Merrie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Stubbs Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 WHAT'S THIS? I WAS NOT INFORMED! Probably the better decision. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 [quote name='The Catalyst' timestamp='1295994091' post='2601057'] Blaze of Glory > Blaze of fail [/quote] Are you saying that being incredibly short-sighted and doing something to try (and most likely fail) and buddy up to the larger part of the power structure is a [i]good[/i] thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Catalyst Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 [quote name='Neo Uruk' timestamp='1295994727' post='2601089'] Are you saying that being incredibly short-sighted and doing something to try (and most likely fail) and buddy up to the larger part of the power structure is a [i]good[/i] thing. [/quote] no im saying you should stick to your decision. it shows bad goverment and running of an alliance to change your mind like this, unless there is a revolution like in russia in ww1. if i was in the alliance and we declared war i would not dispute it until after the war, i think the members of \m/ who complained after the declaration should have waited until after the war to act on there discontent. i also think NPO are being far too nice to \m/ although i gues they need al the allies they can get. i dnt think anyone out of \m/ 's opinion should affect there decision either, like if someone says its dishonorable then unles there in \m/ it should be like idc? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subcomandante VL Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 NPO and INT have something in common. Initiate world implosion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 [quote name='The Catalyst' timestamp='1295995397' post='2601112'] no im saying you should stick to your decision. it shows bad goverment and running of an alliance to change your mind like this, unless there is a revolution like in russia in ww1. if i was in the alliance and we declared war i would not dispute it until after the war, i think the members of \m/ who complained after the declaration should have waited until after the war to act on there discontent. i also think NPO are being far too nice to \m/ although i gues they need al the allies they can get. i dnt think anyone out of \m/ 's opinion should affect there decision either, like if someone says its dishonorable then unles there in \m/ it should be like idc? [/quote] 1) We weren't told about the war prior, except for maybe six people on IRC. 2) We now are in the process of reforming our government, as three members of it have resigned. 3) Pacifica is indeed being lenient, and they have our gratitude for it. Other than that, I really don't get what that has to do with anything here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earogema Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 [quote name='JT Jag' timestamp='1295980941' post='2600601'] Very pro move, Merrie, negotiating peace behind the back of the rest of \m/'s gov. Then again, par for the course, considering that the declaration of war happened on short notice with little communication as well. You guys are a feckless anarchy and should just disband again. [size="1"](Marx you're still ok)[/size] [/quote] Marx is the one who caused this, so I have no idea why you would be of that sentiment. In fact, if it weren't for Marx, Stubbs, and Margrave doing something the rest of \m/ gov. didn't want, this whole thing wouldn't have happened and \m/ would just be an ally defending Rok. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Stubbs Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 [quote name='Earogema' timestamp='1295995781' post='2601127'] In fact, if it weren't for Marx, Stubbs, and Margrave doing something the rest of \m/ gov. didn't want, this whole thing wouldn't have happened and \m/ would just be an ally defending Rok. [/quote] This man is, in fact, telling the complete truth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Catalyst Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 [quote name='Neo Uruk' timestamp='1295995734' post='2601124'] 1) We weren't told about the war prior, except for maybe six people on IRC. 2) We now are in the process of reforming our government, as three members of it have resigned. 3) Pacifica is indeed being lenient, and they have our gratitude for it. Other than that, I really don't get what that has to do with anything here. [/quote] it doesnt matter how you say it \m/ declared war \m/ gov resigned (even if they dont agree resigning while at war is worst thing they could do) \m/ choose there leader there responsible for the desisions made by the leader they choose \m/ chose to make peace instead of fighting on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cookavich Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 Excellent. Way to own up to your mistake, \m/. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirWilliam Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 This has been an odd ordeal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Stubbs Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 [quote name='SirWilliam' timestamp='1295996186' post='2601143'] This has been an odd ordeal. [/quote] And you got to have a part in it! I must say, though, it was, at least, nice talking to you about that whole idea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 [quote name='The Catalyst' timestamp='1295995966' post='2601134'] it doesnt matter how you say it \m/ declared war \m/ gov resigned (even if they dont agree resigning while at war is worst thing they could do) \m/ choose there leader there responsible for the desisions made by the leader they choose \m/ chose to make peace instead of fighting on. [/quote] And now, we're going to make amends for it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hullean Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 MM, I think this is a pretty collected choice that will help \m/ in the future, congratulations Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Catalyst Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 [quote name='Neo Uruk' timestamp='1295996352' post='2601147'] And now, we're going to make amends for it. [/quote] well you should make better leadership choices, like goverment who will stay with your alliance throughout all decisions, and a leader who asks his alliance..might be a good start Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacques Cousteau Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 [quote name='King Charge' timestamp='1295979189' post='2600513'] I love all the people from Doomhouse ripping on \m/. Their CB and announcement was just as good as yours was. Just because you're a bigger, more organized, and more manipulative bunch of preteen school girls doesn't mean you're any better than \m/. At least they have the stones to admit that they were wrong. [/quote] Im pretty sure all three of those things would suggest that they are better than \m/. What are your qualifications for a good alliance? Small, unorganized, and as strategically minded as a handicapped gorilla? Also, "they" are a rag tag group of nobodies hiding behind a famous AA. So that's something. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Trail Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 you lasted less then The hanseatic league Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 (edited) [quote name='Jacques Cousteau' timestamp='1295996521' post='2601155'] Also, "they" are a rag tag group of nobodies hiding behind a famous AA. So that's something. [/quote] Heh, Jacko. We've actually got (and had) quite a few former \m/embers from the first \m/ in our alliance. The fact that we have other people doesn't change that. [quote name='The Trail' timestamp='1295996745' post='2601158'] you lasted less then The hanseatic league [/quote] We made an error. We're working to fix it. It's not like we bowed out to save our infra, since we're still (marginally) at war with SLCB. If only RIA would give us some slots. Edited January 25, 2011 by Neo Uruk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorponok Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 Good move \m/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirWilliam Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 [quote name='Chief Stubbs' timestamp='1295996274' post='2601146'] And you got to have a part in it! I must say, though, it was, at least, nice talking to you about that whole idea. [/quote] Was certainly intriguing even if it was never meant to be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Charge Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 [quote name='Jacques Cousteau' timestamp='1295996521' post='2601155'] Im pretty sure all three of those things would suggest that they are better than \m/. What are your qualifications for a good alliance? Small, unorganized, and as strategically minded as a handicapped gorilla? Also, "they" are a rag tag group of nobodies hiding behind a famous AA. So that's something. [/quote] All I'm saying is your DoW and CB was just as stupid, yet you feel the need to come in here and beat on \m/. That, in my opinion, is not a quality of a good alliance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tygaland Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 A wise decision. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diogenes Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 An excellent decision. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.