Jacques Cousteau

WoC It was the catalyst that caused the most interesting period in bob's history to arise.

Fun times. Everyone had a purpose or a roll.

If you are thick enough to let Terry Howard into a leadership position, you'll end up getting attacked soon enough. Im guessing people wont be needing to cite a 4 year old grudge either.

If ever a good decision was made, this is it.

[quote name='Gloin' timestamp='1344495769' post='3020120'] I'm glad zoom decided to stay. We would surely miss his antics. [/quote] He's gone. And I blame you.

I'm honestly offended that i didn't make that list.

[quote name='suryanto tan' timestamp='1321257217' post='2844494'] Hi, frosniper . Nah, the point of this thread is not to humiliate NG. Of course every alliance has, as you put it, dirt. However, I am not a hundred percent convinced about the "very small number". Have you heard of random sampling and its implication? If these are the very small number, somehow I feel very lucky, I hit a jackpot in the first attempt which is too good to be true. But that's beside the point. I am not so sure if my effort has been wasted. I guess we will have to be patient and wait a bit to find out. Besides, many have find this helpful if nothing other than painting a smile on their faces. [/quote] Hi Suryanto. My only excuse for my sad little warchest is that I bought a wonder the day before I declared. To be fair, this is the biggest warchest ive had. I always tell myself that by the next war ill have something saved up but its never true. 3million+ casualties later and I still haven't learned my lesson. In any case, im enjoying myself. I hope you are too. [quote name='Vespassianus' timestamp='1321260645' post='2844522'] Nation name: The Ocean Ruler: Jacques Cousteau - he actually fought for NEW in the Fark-NEW war. Also i like this thread, i demand something like this from more Kaskus members. [/quote] That I did. I think. It was a long time ago. The only thing I can tell ya is my warchest was even smaller back then.

[quote name='Crymson' timestamp='1299572568' post='2656541'] Q's breakup began long before that. [/quote] I believe we have a conflict of perspective. I see a much larger focus on external pressures weighing on Q and subsequently causing its breakup than you do. From the inside, i have no doubt that you viewed internal conflict as the main issue. I, on the other hand, watched from the outside as a growing horde of nations from communities that had been broken up by Q alliances found their way into positions of power. One might say that Q's demise began with the first enemy they made.

[quote name='Crymson' timestamp='1297831205' post='2635205'] Vox at #2? I disagree. Vox didn't have any actual military power, as we all know. Their focus was on bringing change via espionage. In this, they were far, far, [b][i]far[/i][/b] less successful than they like to think and claim that they were. They were a nuisance, at most. They were by absolutely no means any sort of world changer. [/quote] It wasn't about change through espionage. It was about creating a centralized and organized group that everyone could rally around. You have to be joking if you really believe they didn't have a serious impact on the events that brought down the Hegemony.

Lots of love SLCB.

[quote name='Matthew Conrad' timestamp='1296274543' post='2608513'] I would appreciate if you would use proper grammar next time. I will otherwise be unable to accommodate your comments as it seems I currently don't know what you're saying. [/quote] There were no real grammatical errors in his sentence. Maybe you meant to say, "Type like a native English speaker."

Topic of the year? It shocks me that you aren't a respected and cherished individual.

[quote name='Cataduanes' timestamp='1296200904' post='2607152'] If your that curious may I suggest you contact Athens, ODN, LOST and GR. Also way to go in judging a whole alliance on my posts alone. Generally when someone is talking on this OOC section of the forum there is a distinct possibility they are conveying their own view, surely you get that right? [/quote] Nah, im going off of the numerous observations ive made of both yourself and your alliance mates. My guesses are ODN vouched for you guys, you did some diplo-rushes, Athens signed on, and LOST and GR followed suit. Its not surprising that they tried to fill the hole but still, they could have done better. Its too bad really, because I was so happy to see ODN enter. I even posted the announcement for that. It was a special occasion and everyone was very happy to have them. They fit in. I haven't had that feeling with you guys and ive been told by quite a few old friends that your entry was a bit of a rush/shock/surprise.

[quote name='supercoolyellow' timestamp='1296183472' post='2606564'] I'm not sure why you want other alliances to be like FoB. [/quote] You heard it here first folks. The standard of disbandment has been set by FoB. I guess.

[quote name='Cataduanes' timestamp='1296168610' post='2606218'] Totally spot on in my view, but you know we irrelevant masses outside the select band of ''friends'' are not taken into consideration...unless we all buy into the line that this is all for the greater good with MK and co working on our collective behalf to make the game 'better'. [/quote] Why were you allowed into CnG? You folks are just as painfully bland as your average Legion or GATO.