Ogaden Posted December 9, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 (edited) Apparently an MDP bloc with someone is simply a good gesture treaty. As much as I'm always on RIA's side... :haw: ...this treaty is generally pointless. Unless of course there is some other motive to it. Redundant treaties clogging up the treaty web piss me off. We do it on purpose, we're trying to raise your blood pressure. Edited December 9, 2009 by James Dahl Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caffine Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 This is a pretty cool treaty, and I'd be remiss if I didn't post this image Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
im317 Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 i am very glad to see this come to fruition, i personally put work into this relationship and have much for both of these fine alliances. Apparently an MDP bloc with someone is simply a good gesture treaty. As much as I'm always on RIA's side... :haw: ...this treaty is generally pointless. Unless of course there is some other motive to it. Redundant treaties clogging up the treaty web piss me off. people really need to read more carefully. this is a MDoAP, thought you didn't make the common mistake of thinking Bastion is a MDoAP you did fail to connect the dots. this treaty is not redundant, at least not in whole. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackSkellington Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 (edited) Well seeing as how I mentioned Bastion as the "MDP bloc" in my first post, I think I didn't make the common mistake. And yes, it still is redundant. What you apparently fail to consider is the bloc "Below" that OV, VE, and GOD are already in that is an MADP bloc, along with GOD being in SF, obviously an MADP bloc. It seems to me where SF goes, OV and VE will generally be on that same side. Unless of course they decide to just skip Below...But I don't see that happening. Edited December 9, 2009 by JackSkellington Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SonOfHoward Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 JackSkellington your posts needz moar bacon plz. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thunder Strike Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 Bacon, VE, RIA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farnsworth Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 This thread needs more bacon. o/ random insanity Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackSkellington Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 (edited) Fixed my disgusting posts. And to be honest, this makes me think of VanHoo... Also: Edited December 9, 2009 by JackSkellington Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enrage Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 if you hate bacon...your ****ing crazy! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xanaetos Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 Great to see this come together! o/ VE o/ RIA ...and always, o/ Bacon! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penkala Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 Well seeing as how I mentioned Bastion as the "MDP bloc" in my first post, I think I didn't make the common mistake. And yes, it still is redundant. What you apparently fail to consider is the bloc "Below" that OV, VE, and GOD are already in that is an MADP bloc, along with GOD being in SF, obviously an MADP bloc. It seems to me where SF goes, OV and VE will generally be on that same side. Unless of course they decide to just skip Below...But I don't see that happening. OK. Don't really care though. In fact I'm considering seeing if we can't sign a NAP now... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
im317 Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 Well seeing as how I mentioned Bastion as the "MDP bloc" in my first post, I think I didn't make the common mistake. And yes, it still is redundant. What you apparently fail to consider is the bloc "Below" that OV, VE, and GOD are already in that is an MADP bloc, along with GOD being in SF, obviously an MADP bloc. It seems to me where SF goes, OV and VE will generally be on that same side. Unless of course they decide to just skip Below...But I don't see that happening. i said you didn't make that mistake actually, which is nice. if you want to connect indirectly like that then there is The Balkan Entente which predates Below. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackSkellington Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 You put "thought" instead of "though" which confused me on what you meant by the sentence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mustakrakish II Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 I love how RIA has so man different flags! congratulations, and Happy Bacon Treaty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timberland Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 Congrats guys I loved the "bros before hoes" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wickedj Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 OK. Don't really care though. In fact I'm considering seeing if we can't sign a NAP now... CSN-RIA PIAT FTW! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caffine Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 If this ever gets activated I know I'll finally have an excuse to break this out Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goldie Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 Apparently an MDP bloc with someone is simply a good gesture treaty. As much as I'm always on RIA's side... :haw: ...this treaty is generally pointless. Unless of course there is some other motive to it. Redundant treaties clogging up the treaty web piss me off. You're telling this to an alliance that has 2 MADP's with GOD. Here is the extent of the foreign affairs that went into the treaty: Me: Delta, MDoAP? Delta: Ok. Me: Cool. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SonOfHoward Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 Fixed my disgusting posts. And to be honest, this makes me think of VanHoo... Also: aw thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crushtania Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 I agree with the no bacon rationing clause. We need more of them on Bob. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SonOfHoward Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 You're telling this to an alliance that has 2 MADP's with GOD.Here is the extent of the foreign affairs that went into the treaty: Me: Delta, MDoAP? Delta: Ok. Me: Cool. log dump! [17:11] <@goldielax25[VE]> [17:10] <@SonOfHoward[VE]> Someone ask delta if he wants an MDoAP with VE [17:11] <@goldielax25[VE]> [17:10] <&Impero[VE]> lol [17:11] <@goldielax25[VE]> [17:10] <@SonOfHoward[VE]> I'm not gov so I cant [17:12] <~Delta1212[RIA]> Sure [17:12] <@goldielax25[VE]> ok [17:12] <@goldielax25[VE]> cool Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TypoNinja Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 log dump![17:11] <@goldielax25[VE]> [17:10] <@SonOfHoward[VE]> Someone ask delta if he wants an MDoAP with VE [17:11] <@goldielax25[VE]> [17:10] <&Impero[VE]> lol [17:11] <@goldielax25[VE]> [17:10] <@SonOfHoward[VE]> I'm not gov so I cant [17:12] <~Delta1212[RIA]> Sure [17:12] <@goldielax25[VE]> ok [17:12] <@goldielax25[VE]> cool Its true. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pancaeks Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 this thread makes me hungry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trinite Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 (edited) this treaty makes me hungry Edit: Well that's embarrassing. I should read through a whole thread before posting. Point still stands. Edited December 9, 2009 by Trinite Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crazyisraelie Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 This treaty angers and confuses me! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.