Tick1 Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 Remember this, Mr Judge of honour?:http://cybernations.wikia.com/wiki/Eight_Minute_War Another good raid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bedford Forrest Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 (edited) I read through all of our active/inactive treaties, I see NO treaty with Knights of Ni! Not only are these folks not in a treaty with us, any word search of Nii or KoN in our alliance forum turns up no evidence that KoN even exists. They have no embassy with us. What color are they? From whence do they come? I heve never seen them. Prove to me that they exist. If I show a cookie in public, will they come out and be seen in our forum? Eh? meh. Edited November 14, 2009 by Bedford Forrest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supreme 142 Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 (edited) Not only are these folks not in a treaty with us, any word search of Nii or KoN in our alliance forum turns up no evidence that KoN even exists. They have no embassy with us. What color are they? From whence do they come? I heve never seen them. Prove to me that they exist. If I show a cookie in public, will they come out and be seen in our forum? Eh? meh. I asked the same questions. Still waiting for an answer Edited November 14, 2009 by Supreme 142 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 Nice to see FoB got in on the action too. Nice to know their "honour" is still as upstanding as always New rule: Anyone who still defends Continuum's past (the bloodthirsty parts), Hegemonic actions, or anything of the sort can't try to demonize an honorable alliance for raiding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mdnss69 Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 Remember this, Mr Judge of honour?:http://cybernations.wikia.com/wiki/Eight_Minute_War Exactly what I was referring to. My memory of targets is just a teeny bit shorter in length than the ability of some alliances to bandwagon and jump a target a lot smaller than them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azaghul Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 Exactly what I was referring to. My memory of targets is just a teeny bit shorter in length than the ability of some alliances to bandwagon and jump a target a lot smaller than them. Actually they joined us at our request largely because FoB had a lot of lower ranked nations and MK didn't, and most of your alliance was in the lower ranks. Our CB in that war was about as airtight as CBs get, and we ended up letting y'all off a lot easier than most other alliances would have. There's nothing wrong with calling in allies to help fill in the gaps of target coverage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 Actually they joined us at our request largely because FoB had a lot of lower ranked nations and MK didn't, and most of your alliance was in the lower ranks.Our CB in that war was about as airtight as CBs get, and we ended up letting y'all off a lot easier than most other alliances would have. There's nothing wrong with calling in allies to help fill in the gaps of target coverage. Unless you're CnG and somebody wants to mount a smear campaign, of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magicninja Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 Got through 30 pages and couldn't take anymore. While I don't like tech raiding I'm not gonna sit here and rail on Athens for choosing to do something they have every right to do. It may not be nice and all but who said Athens was nice? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
enderland Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 Unless you're CnG and somebody wants to mount a smear campaign, of course. There are plenty of people in Athens and FoB mounting the smear campaign against yourselves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emperor Khan Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 (edited) You are getting a temporary different mask on our forums so you can see the MASH embassy. Take a look yourself. What was the result Tick1? Edited November 14, 2009 by Emperor Khan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 There are plenty of people in Athens and FoB mounting the smear campaign against yourselves Myself? I'm not even linked to a CnG alliance directly. And no, the people in Athens and FoB are making clear points. Whether you agree with them or not doesn't mean that they are terrible people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tick1 Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 What was the result Tick1? According to their forums they do have one. According to M*A*S*H's forums they don't. If M*A*S*H says they don't it's a no. Since you need two alliances to sign a treaty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
enderland Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 Myself? I'm not even linked to a CnG alliance directly.And no, the people in Athens and FoB are making clear points. Whether you agree with them or not doesn't mean that they are terrible people. Then why are you on a crusade to vindicate Athens/FoB (poorly, I might add)? Yeah, they are making clear points - if you don't have the abilities to defend yourself, you'll get raided, regardless of size. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Janova Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 Unless you're CnG and somebody wants to mount a smear campaign, of course. Calling in allies is not what people are having an issue with here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 Then why are you on a crusade to vindicate Athens/FoB (poorly, I might add)?Yeah, they are making clear points - if you don't have the abilities to defend yourself, you'll get raided, regardless of size. Why are you here trying to demonize tech raiding (which isn't working) I'm fairly sure that's what most people believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supreme 142 Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 According to their forums they do have one.According to M*A*S*H's forums they don't. If M*A*S*H says they don't it's a no. Since you need two alliances to sign a treaty. Who applied for the embassy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emperor Khan Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 According to their forums they do have one.According to M*A*S*H's forums they don't. If M*A*S*H says they don't it's a no. Since you need two alliances to sign a treaty. So was this a treaty posted (or signed) by M*A*S*H govt. over on their forums? I'm guessing that if he gave you access you could see the history (conversation) behind it? Date it was signed? Who signed it etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gofastleft Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 Epic thread. After reading 55 pages I have been most amused watching who is defending this mass coordinated "tech" raid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tick1 Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 Who applied for the embassy? boomerisgod So was this a treaty posted (or signed) by M*A*S*H govt. over on their forums? I'm guessing that if he gave you access you could see the history (conversation) behind it? Date it was signed? Who signed it etc. For the Knights of NI!, KofN President, .FBI. (Re-signed 6/15/2008 by) MoFA of the KofN, Capt. "Aloha" (originally signed by Apollo King) For the Mighty Armed States of Honor (M*A*S*H), Commanding Officer - Flonker Executive Officers - Ruphus and boomerisgod Senior Drill Instructor - Col Fitswilliam Officer of Foreign Affairs - Linkmandx Officer of Internal Affairs - Bedford Forrest Enlistment Officer - Dran129 Payroll Officer - --Chase-- Chief JAG Justice - Osagi89 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wad of Lint Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 Now I'm just asking out of pure curiosity, not even 1-2 man alliances? Surely NSO allows those. Either way, I am surprised. My hats off to you, NSO. No. We do not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homura Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 New rule: Anyone who still defends Continuum's past (the bloodthirsty parts), Hegemonic actions, or anything of the sort can't try to demonize an honorable alliance for raiding. New rule rejected. I can demonise whoever I please, especially a so-called honourable alliance who declares a war of conquest on a neutral one 1/6 of their size and calls it an even match. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mdnss69 Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 (edited) edited before I get myself in trouble than this lot is worth Edited November 14, 2009 by mdnss69 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tick1 Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 New rule rejected. I can demonise whoever I please, especially a so-called honourable alliance who declares a war of conquest on a neutral one 1/6 of their size and calls it an even match. You mean a raiding conquest? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emperor Khan Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 SNIP Interesting, thank you. What sort of treaty was it? A ToA? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
enderland Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 Why are you here trying to demonize tech raiding (which isn't working)I'm fairly sure that's what most people believe. hahahahaha I've raided more raids than all of Athens and FoB have against Knights of Ni! at the moment. There is a huge difference however between raiding someone on "none" or in a small, 3 man AA, where there is almost no sense of community, and raiding an alliance that is big enough to have forums with embassies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts