Blue Lightning Posted November 10, 2009 Report Share Posted November 10, 2009 That's good to hear. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
x8BitL0gic Posted November 10, 2009 Report Share Posted November 10, 2009 Honorable, and very helpful. It makes me happy to see someone who has the growth of the entire Cyberverse in mind. o/ TSU! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hasin Posted November 10, 2009 Report Share Posted November 10, 2009 I dislike the proletariat masses banding together. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Death II Posted November 10, 2009 Report Share Posted November 10, 2009 I dislike the proletariat masses banding together. Ah but dont cha know? This is just a plot by the bourgeoisie to control the masses and make them subversive to them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Kremlin Posted November 10, 2009 Report Share Posted November 10, 2009 More tech in this world is always a good thing. Good luck to you all Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Itsuki Koizumi Posted November 10, 2009 Report Share Posted November 10, 2009 o/ keve. nice werk mate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uralica Posted November 10, 2009 Report Share Posted November 10, 2009 I like this idea a LOT. Anything that is dedicated to increasing accountability, is something I personally would love to have a part of. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FreddieMercury Posted November 10, 2009 Report Share Posted November 10, 2009 d) All unfulfilled deals will be considered the sole responsibility of the alliance orchestrating the deal in the first place. Neither other signatories nor the TSU may be held responsible for these failings. Question: are you considering the alliance of the buyer (who fills out the forms) to be the one to be the one "orchestrating" the deal? Or the alliance which the seller is in? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Il Impero Romano Posted November 10, 2009 Report Share Posted November 10, 2009 Great concept, glad to see it come about. Congratulations to our allies in World Federation and their fellow signatories. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duncan King Posted November 10, 2009 Report Share Posted November 10, 2009 In my experience the only unreliable or dodgy dealing in tech deals has been on the part of the seller. I've never known of a seller complain that the buyer didn't pay up as agreed, while anyone who has participated as a buyer in more than 10 tech deals will probably have found themselves ripped off at least once with either late tech, a deliberate scam or inactivity on the part of the seller. Therefore, it seems odd to me that it would be necessary for tech sellers to band together like this for security, seeing as they generally get the cushy end of the stick most of the time.Maybe this will prove to increase the reliability on the part of the tech sellers, which would be a welcome improvement from my point of view. As much as it pains me, I agree with this individual. In my experience, it's the sellers who either steal the money outright or go inactive that cause more tech deals to go bad than anything the buyers do. If you can cut down on tech seller misbehavior, then your Union may be something to look into. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keve69 Posted November 10, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 10, 2009 Question: are you considering the alliance of the buyer (who fills out the forms) to be the one to be the one "orchestrating" the deal? Or the alliance which the seller is in? The alliance the seller is in... sorry if that wasnt clear Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strelock Posted November 10, 2009 Report Share Posted November 10, 2009 i likey this very much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keve69 Posted November 10, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 10, 2009 As much as it pains me, I agree with this individual. In my experience, it's the sellers who either steal the money outright or go inactive that cause more tech deals to go bad than anything the buyers do. If you can cut down on tech seller misbehavior, then your Union may be something to look into. Like I told the previously concerned gentleman from TOP I agree! Thats one of the things we are trying to eradicate... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix von Agnu Posted November 10, 2009 Report Share Posted November 10, 2009 Like I told the previously concerned gentleman from TOP I agree! Thats one of the things we are trying to eradicate... I really do like this idea, and I hope you can find a way to solve the problem. Best of luck to TSU. Maybe I'll find myself there with Nevermore in the future. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homeboy Posted November 10, 2009 Report Share Posted November 10, 2009 Awesome treaty, this is very interesting for the cyberverse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King MyLife Posted November 10, 2009 Report Share Posted November 10, 2009 o/ TSU Keve nice job mate...Great wording on it to... Those of you that didnt get the forum it is located here http://techsellers.info/index.php... Any more question you can contact me on IRC in #TGH and i will try to fill in all your blanks... thanx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Londo Mollari Posted November 10, 2009 Report Share Posted November 10, 2009 This is a lot bigger than most of the people reading it realize. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TehChron Posted November 10, 2009 Report Share Posted November 10, 2009 This is a lot bigger than most of the people reading it realize. Yeah, I'm not particularly interested, though. I mean, I understand the gravity of it, especially if they truly can churn out a near 100% efficiency rate, but...Meh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banksy Posted November 10, 2009 Report Share Posted November 10, 2009 This looks pretty interesting guys- i'm sure you'll have a big impact on planet Bob's economic scene. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Londo Mollari Posted November 10, 2009 Report Share Posted November 10, 2009 Yeah, I'm not particularly interested, though.I mean, I understand the gravity of it, especially if they truly can churn out a near 100% efficiency rate, but...Meh. The control of a significant portion of the seller's market can be used to artificially inflate demand. It's sort of the same way a monopoly works in economics. If you control an essential resource, you can charge whatever price you want for it. Of course, any control this consortium achieves will be only partial, but the expansion of the consortium will be driven by self interests of smaller nations. It seems likely to me that this may lead to conflict, possibly even to war. I am glad to see market forces start to arise in CN though, it will make the game a lot more interesting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minilla Island Posted November 10, 2009 Report Share Posted November 10, 2009 It is great to see the long-standing dream of Keve, the UINE, and the Guru Order to forge a tech-pact. It is even greater to see it on a bigger scale than once envisioned. Hail! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TehChron Posted November 10, 2009 Report Share Posted November 10, 2009 The control of a significant portion of the seller's market can be used to artificially inflate demand. It's sort of the same way a monopoly works in economics. If you control an essential resource, you can charge whatever price you want for it. Of course, any control this consortium achieves will be only partial, but the expansion of the consortium will be driven by self interests of smaller nations. It seems likely to me that this may lead to conflict, possibly even to war. I am glad to see market forces start to arise in CN though, it will make the game a lot more interesting. Londo. Give me some credit. That only applies if they're able to legitimately put out enough product to be able to exert such an effect, which I realize. And remain uninterested in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archon Posted November 10, 2009 Report Share Posted November 10, 2009 I will alert my financial folks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Death II Posted November 10, 2009 Report Share Posted November 10, 2009 Londo.Give me some credit. That only applies if they're able to legitimately put out enough product to be able to exert such an effect, which I realize. And remain uninterested in. Our current orders already place us over 165k tech. Thats just in the first few hours of this announcement. B) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
infinite citadel Posted November 10, 2009 Report Share Posted November 10, 2009 I will alert my financial folks. One step ahead of you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.