The Big Bad Posted November 9, 2009 Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 Congrats on getting the 3 leftist alliances that no one has heard of to sign a treaty that optionaly unites them. Yeah thats some leftist unity alright. Why don't the 3 of you just merge and make a small alliance instead, that would show more unity than forming a tiny optional defense bloc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nizoral Posted November 9, 2009 Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 If I was a suspicious man I would say that the wording of the OP was meant at a dig towards the LSF and INT as they aren't in the supposed "home of the leftist alliances wishing to contribute for the prosperity of the leftis ideology" seeing as their names aren't on it, if they where offered to become members of this and refused.If they where not even offered I don't understand how completely ignoring the two highest profile left alliance contributes to prosperity. But best of luck anyway. Then probably you are a suspicious man if you think that way. LSF isn't in this because LSF doesn't go by the leftist thing, we get into treaties with friends and alliances close to us in the political spectrum (note this isn't commie related, i'm referring to direct democracies). Yes we were approached and didn't want to jump in, so what? That being said, i can't understand all the mockery this thread is getting. And i really hope plenty of luck to SWF with their new venture. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fadeev Posted November 9, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 Congrats on getting the 3 leftist alliances that no one has heard of to sign a treaty that optionaly unites them. Yeah thats some leftist unity alright. Why don't the 3 of you just merge and make a small alliance instead, that would show more unity than forming a tiny optional defense bloc. Nobody asked for your opinion. Thanks for stopping by. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fadeev Posted November 9, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 What's this, the fourth of fifth time now that the CN 'left' has united? Every time in CN history when the 'left' unities it ends up in further disunity and factionalism.Good luck with the Pact. P.S. Are the SWF forums the same ones as before? I might drop by and say hello. The forums are here: http://z3.invisionfree.com/CNSWF/index.php Drop by! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deadshot Posted November 9, 2009 Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 Congrats on getting the 3 leftist alliances that no one has heard of to sign a treaty that optionaly unites them. Yeah thats some leftist unity alright. Why don't the 3 of you just merge and make a small alliance instead, that would show more unity than forming a tiny optional defense bloc. Nobody asked for your opinion. Thanks for stopping by. By announcing this in public, you are inviting the world's opinion. As it stands, my old friend TBB is not wrong. No disrespect, but optional unification is exactly what this is. Also, is this the Warsaw Pact part III? Regardless, good luck on this venture. It's not too often you find true friends within. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iosif Posted November 9, 2009 Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 Nobody asked for your opinion. Thanks for stopping by. By making this a public announcement: yes you did. Just don't expect to get mere hails everytime you announce something, there are some folks out there who will make you face the cold reality as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fadeev Posted November 9, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 By making this a public announcement: yes you did. Just don't expect to get mere hails everytime you announce something, there are some folks out there who will make you face the cold reality as well. No i didnt and i wont argue on that. As this a public forum, people can read the announcements, but dont have to comment, if they have nothing to say. If the cold reality you are mentioning is trolling, then yes, i face trolling. But then again - you dont have to notice my comments about trolling as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Brendan Posted November 9, 2009 Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 Warsaw Pact round 2? Well, I hope NATO becomes a member this time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChairmanHal Posted November 9, 2009 Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 TBB stole my thunder a bit, but... "lol reform SWF", "lol reform Warsaw Pact", "lol commies" Think about why so many people feel this way. Look at your treaty. It's already a recipe for "lol reform SWF", "lol reform Warsaw Pact", "lol commies" and the ink isn't try yet. Want to impress us? Sign a MADP. Now we'll be a tiny bit concerned you're not going to slam into the wall the second time around the track. As is... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fadeev Posted November 9, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 TBB stole my thunder a bit, but...Think about why so many people feel this way. Look at your treaty. It's already a recipe for "lol reform SWF", "lol reform Warsaw Pact", "lol commies" and the ink isn't try yet. Want to impress us? Sign a MADP. Now we'll be a tiny bit concerned you're not going to slam into the wall the second time around the track. As is... To be honest with you Hal, its SWF, that cant sign higher treaties than ODPs right now. Thats why it is a oDoAP for now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flak attack Posted November 9, 2009 Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 NoR needs to put together an anti-Commie block. The two sides are falling out of balance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iosif Posted November 9, 2009 Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 NoR needs to put together an anti-Commie block. The two sides are falling out of balance. Considering how even Nordreich alone is more relevant than whole this bloc, I'd say they're not the ones who should be worried about the balance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cataduanes Posted November 9, 2009 Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 NoR needs to put together an anti-Commie block. The two sides are falling out of balance. heh those days are gone flak, have you not heard? Nordreich and the commies are drinking buddies these days Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChairmanHal Posted November 9, 2009 Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 To be honest with you Hal, its SWF, that cant sign higher treaties than ODPs right now. Thats why it is a oDoAP for now. Then I would have two levels of membership in the Pact, with a MADP clause and a OADP clause. Other blocs have done this in the past. Yes, there are only three alliances involved for now, but presumably you would be recruiting other Left leaning alliances into this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MagnusTroy Posted November 9, 2009 Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 One more step for us Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D34th Posted November 9, 2009 Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 (edited) OADP for unity? lol commies [OOC]Also this is a great day to start a bloc called Warsaw Pact, in the 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall[/OOC] Edited November 9, 2009 by D34th Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KahlanRahl Posted November 9, 2009 Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 All things aside, the graphic for this bloc is kick $@!. You all can't deny that. Good luck guys, this is pretty awesome. o/ Proletariat o/ Workers of the World! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cataduanes Posted November 9, 2009 Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 [OOC]Also this is a great day to start a bloc called Warsaw Pact, in the 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall[/OOC] Man i never thought of that, I wonder did the Warsaw Pact mean to pick this date intentionally? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flak attack Posted November 9, 2009 Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 (edited) Considering how even Nordreich alone is more relevant than whole this bloc, I'd say they're not the ones who should be worried about the balance. Yeah, but NoR and Int are the same size. That leaves this block and LSF unchecked. heh those days are gone flak, have you not heard? Nordreich and the commies are drinking buddies these days In the interest of preserving tradition, I refuse to accept this. Edited November 9, 2009 by flak attack Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChairmanHal Posted November 9, 2009 Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 Man i never thought of that, I wonder did the Warsaw Pact mean to pick this date intentionally? That would require a level of forethought and knowledge that has been demonstratively absent in CN Commies. Of course I could be wrong, but if so, probably not their best move. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Style #386 Posted November 9, 2009 Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 Yeah, but NoR and Int are the same size. That leaves this block and LSF unchecked. And with that imbalance of power, more leftists blocs shall appear! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix von Agnu Posted November 9, 2009 Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 That would require a level of forethought and knowledge that has been demonstratively absent in CN Commies. Of course I could be wrong, but if so, probably not their best move. Personally, I'm just going to call it foreshadowing. Good luck with what ever incarnation of the Warsaw Pact we're actually on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cataduanes Posted November 9, 2009 Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 (edited) That would require a level of forethought and knowledge that has been demonstratively absent in CN Commies. Of course I could be wrong, but if so, probably not their best move. Ouch! not all CN commies are guilty of silliness Edited November 9, 2009 by Cataduanes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D34th Posted November 9, 2009 Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 Man i never thought of that, I wonder did the Warsaw Pact mean to pick this date intentionally? If they did intentionally it fail, if they don't it just show how much they know about history and fail. B) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Space Monkey Posted November 9, 2009 Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 If they did intentionally it fail, if they don't it just show how much they know about history and fail. B) It also could be a coincidence or maybe they did it as a prophetic rebirth to the new reality to which socialism expands across the planet to enlighten the minds of the people, but does it really matter? It's a group of alliances who signed a treaty to show their friendship to the world. So anyway, good luck guys. remember - great success is the ultimate revenge. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.